1000 times yes. I asked Chris about this a few years ago and he told me svn was fine now he's a git slut..... I think that's the technical term.
Anyway for those of us who live with rubbish broadband or who like committing often but out of the main repo it's a welcome change. Tom On 22 Aug 2015 1:55 am, "Lewis John Mcgibbney" <lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Valerie, > Main rationale seems to be that most patches are comingr through Github. > Therefore people seem to be pulling code from the github mirror at master > branch as oppose to from SVN trunk. > > On Friday, August 21, 2015, Mallder, Valerie <valerie.mall...@jhuapl.edu> > wrote: > > > I guess I can't really object. But, I don't really want to learn "yet > > another CM system" :(. Would be nice to know the rationale behind the > > change though. Why would this be considered an "improvement"? I haven't > run > > into anything yet that would make me dislike svn. > > > > > > > > Sent from my iPhone. > > ________________________________ > > From: Mattmann, Chris A (3980) <chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov > > <javascript:;>> > > Sent: Friday, August 21, 2015 3:50:01 PM > > To: dev@oodt.apache.org <javascript:;> > > Subject: [DISCUSS] Moving to Git (was Re: Moving repository to git) > > > > I would be fully supportive of this. > > > > What do others in the community think? If there are no objections > > over the next week I’d like to call a VOTE. > > > > Note, Radu, that this wouldn’t mean “moving to Github”. Github != > > Git != Apache. Apache has writeable Git repos (that run on ASF > > hardware) and separately, Git mirrors that mirror and interact with > > Github from the Apache gold source. Everyone should check out: > > http://git.apache.org for more detail. > > > > Thoughts, please? > > > > Cheers, > > Chris > > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. > > Chief Architect > > Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398) > > NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA > > Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527 > > Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov <javascript:;> > > WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department > > University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Radu Manole <manole.v.r...@gmail.com <javascript:;>> > > Reply-To: "dev@oodt.apache.org <javascript:;>" <dev@oodt.apache.org > > <javascript:;>> > > Date: Friday, August 21, 2015 at 11:51 AM > > To: oodt <dev@oodt.apache.org <javascript:;>> > > Subject: Moving repository to git > > > > >Hello, > > > > > >Did you consider moving to git from svn as the main repository for the > > >project? > > >Especially since most of the pull requests are done from github, > > >converting > > >a diff to svn feels a bit unnecessary. > > > > > >It woul have made my life easier certainly. Especially if I didn't have > to > > >convert from git to svn diffs in order to post reviews on review board. > > > > > >Thanks, > > >Radu. > > > > > > -- > *Lewis* >
