Hey Lewis, There seems to be widespread support so far. I’d say there’s no need for a VOTE and yes, file the issue, but please note that we’d like to move AFTER 0.10.
That work for everyone? Cheers, Chris — Chris Mattmann chris.mattm...@gmail.com -----Original Message----- From: Lewis John Mcgibbney <lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com> Reply-To: <dev@oodt.apache.org> Date: Monday, August 24, 2015 at 10:31 PM To: "dev@oodt.apache.org" <dev@oodt.apache.org> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Moving to Git (was Re: Moving repository to git) >Hi Folks, >Is anyone taking this on or can I log an issue with INFRA and address it? >Thanks >Lewis > >On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 12:13 PM, Radu Manole <manole.v.r...@gmail.com> >wrote: > >> Super! >> >> If you move to git as the main repository (when?), please don't forget >>to >> update the reviewboard configuration, too, to point to the git repo. >>This >> way, we might be able to actually RBTools to upload review updates >>directly >> from the git repository. >> >> 2015-08-24 18:05 GMT+03:00 Michael Joyce <jo...@apache.org>: >> >> > +1 >> > >> > >> > -- Jimmy >> > >> > On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 10:53 PM, Tom Barber <tom.bar...@meteorite.bi> >> > wrote: >> > >> > > 1000 times yes. >> > > >> > > I asked Chris about this a few years ago and he told me svn was fine >> now >> > > he's a git slut..... I think that's the technical term. >> > > >> > > Anyway for those of us who live with rubbish broadband or who like >> > > committing often but out of the main repo it's a welcome change. >> > > >> > > Tom >> > > On 22 Aug 2015 1:55 am, "Lewis John Mcgibbney" < >> > lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com> >> > > wrote: >> > > >> > > > Hi Valerie, >> > > > Main rationale seems to be that most patches are comingr through >> > Github. >> > > > Therefore people seem to be pulling code from the github mirror at >> > master >> > > > branch as oppose to from SVN trunk. >> > > > >> > > > On Friday, August 21, 2015, Mallder, Valerie < >> > valerie.mall...@jhuapl.edu >> > > > >> > > > wrote: >> > > > >> > > > > I guess I can't really object. But, I don't really want to learn >> "yet >> > > > > another CM system" :(. Would be nice to know the rationale >>behind >> the >> > > > > change though. Why would this be considered an "improvement"? I >> > haven't >> > > > run >> > > > > into anything yet that would make me dislike svn. >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > Sent from my iPhone. >> > > > > ________________________________ >> > > > > From: Mattmann, Chris A (3980) <chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov >> > > > > <javascript:;>> >> > > > > Sent: Friday, August 21, 2015 3:50:01 PM >> > > > > To: dev@oodt.apache.org <javascript:;> >> > > > > Subject: [DISCUSS] Moving to Git (was Re: Moving repository to >>git) >> > > > > >> > > > > I would be fully supportive of this. >> > > > > >> > > > > What do others in the community think? If there are no >>objections >> > > > > over the next week I’d like to call a VOTE. >> > > > > >> > > > > Note, Radu, that this wouldn’t mean “moving to Github”. Github >>!= >> > > > > Git != Apache. Apache has writeable Git repos (that run on ASF >> > > > > hardware) and separately, Git mirrors that mirror and interact >>with >> > > > > Github from the Apache gold source. Everyone should check out: >> > > > > http://git.apache.org for more detail. >> > > > > >> > > > > Thoughts, please? >> > > > > >> > > > > Cheers, >> > > > > Chris >> > > > > >> > > > > >>++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> > > > > Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. >> > > > > Chief Architect >> > > > > Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398) >> > > > > NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA >> > > > > Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527 >> > > > > Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov <javascript:;> >> > > > > WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ >> > > > > >>++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> > > > > Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department >> > > > > University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA >> > > > > >>++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > -----Original Message----- >> > > > > From: Radu Manole <manole.v.r...@gmail.com <javascript:;>> >> > > > > Reply-To: "dev@oodt.apache.org <javascript:;>" < >> dev@oodt.apache.org >> > > > > <javascript:;>> >> > > > > Date: Friday, August 21, 2015 at 11:51 AM >> > > > > To: oodt <dev@oodt.apache.org <javascript:;>> >> > > > > Subject: Moving repository to git >> > > > > >> > > > > >Hello, >> > > > > > >> > > > > >Did you consider moving to git from svn as the main repository >>for >> > the >> > > > > >project? >> > > > > >Especially since most of the pull requests are done from >>github, >> > > > > >converting >> > > > > >a diff to svn feels a bit unnecessary. >> > > > > > >> > > > > >It woul have made my life easier certainly. Especially if I >>didn't >> > > have >> > > > to >> > > > > >convert from git to svn diffs in order to post reviews on >>review >> > > board. >> > > > > > >> > > > > >Thanks, >> > > > > >Radu. >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > -- >> > > > *Lewis* >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > >-- >*Lewis*
