Sounds good to me. Also, yay git!
-- Jimmy On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 10:57 PM, Chris Mattmann <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey Lewis, > > There seems to be widespread support so far. I’d say > there’s no need for a VOTE and yes, file the issue, but > please note that we’d like to move AFTER 0.10. > > That work for everyone? > > Cheers, > Chris > > — > Chris Mattmann > [email protected] > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Lewis John Mcgibbney <[email protected]> > Reply-To: <[email protected]> > Date: Monday, August 24, 2015 at 10:31 PM > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Moving to Git (was Re: Moving repository to git) > > >Hi Folks, > >Is anyone taking this on or can I log an issue with INFRA and address it? > >Thanks > >Lewis > > > >On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 12:13 PM, Radu Manole <[email protected]> > >wrote: > > > >> Super! > >> > >> If you move to git as the main repository (when?), please don't forget > >>to > >> update the reviewboard configuration, too, to point to the git repo. > >>This > >> way, we might be able to actually RBTools to upload review updates > >>directly > >> from the git repository. > >> > >> 2015-08-24 18:05 GMT+03:00 Michael Joyce <[email protected]>: > >> > >> > +1 > >> > > >> > > >> > -- Jimmy > >> > > >> > On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 10:53 PM, Tom Barber <[email protected] > > > >> > wrote: > >> > > >> > > 1000 times yes. > >> > > > >> > > I asked Chris about this a few years ago and he told me svn was fine > >> now > >> > > he's a git slut..... I think that's the technical term. > >> > > > >> > > Anyway for those of us who live with rubbish broadband or who like > >> > > committing often but out of the main repo it's a welcome change. > >> > > > >> > > Tom > >> > > On 22 Aug 2015 1:55 am, "Lewis John Mcgibbney" < > >> > [email protected]> > >> > > wrote: > >> > > > >> > > > Hi Valerie, > >> > > > Main rationale seems to be that most patches are comingr through > >> > Github. > >> > > > Therefore people seem to be pulling code from the github mirror at > >> > master > >> > > > branch as oppose to from SVN trunk. > >> > > > > >> > > > On Friday, August 21, 2015, Mallder, Valerie < > >> > [email protected] > >> > > > > >> > > > wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > > > I guess I can't really object. But, I don't really want to learn > >> "yet > >> > > > > another CM system" :(. Would be nice to know the rationale > >>behind > >> the > >> > > > > change though. Why would this be considered an "improvement"? I > >> > haven't > >> > > > run > >> > > > > into anything yet that would make me dislike svn. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Sent from my iPhone. > >> > > > > ________________________________ > >> > > > > From: Mattmann, Chris A (3980) <[email protected] > >> > > > > <javascript:;>> > >> > > > > Sent: Friday, August 21, 2015 3:50:01 PM > >> > > > > To: [email protected] <javascript:;> > >> > > > > Subject: [DISCUSS] Moving to Git (was Re: Moving repository to > >>git) > >> > > > > > >> > > > > I would be fully supportive of this. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > What do others in the community think? If there are no > >>objections > >> > > > > over the next week I’d like to call a VOTE. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Note, Radu, that this wouldn’t mean “moving to Github”. Github > >>!= > >> > > > > Git != Apache. Apache has writeable Git repos (that run on ASF > >> > > > > hardware) and separately, Git mirrors that mirror and interact > >>with > >> > > > > Github from the Apache gold source. Everyone should check out: > >> > > > > http://git.apache.org for more detail. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Thoughts, please? > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Cheers, > >> > > > > Chris > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >>++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >> > > > > Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. > >> > > > > Chief Architect > >> > > > > Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398) > >> > > > > NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA > >> > > > > Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527 > >> > > > > Email: [email protected] <javascript:;> > >> > > > > WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ > >> > > > > > >>++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >> > > > > Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department > >> > > > > University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA > >> > > > > > >>++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > -----Original Message----- > >> > > > > From: Radu Manole <[email protected] <javascript:;>> > >> > > > > Reply-To: "[email protected] <javascript:;>" < > >> [email protected] > >> > > > > <javascript:;>> > >> > > > > Date: Friday, August 21, 2015 at 11:51 AM > >> > > > > To: oodt <[email protected] <javascript:;>> > >> > > > > Subject: Moving repository to git > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >Hello, > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > >Did you consider moving to git from svn as the main repository > >>for > >> > the > >> > > > > >project? > >> > > > > >Especially since most of the pull requests are done from > >>github, > >> > > > > >converting > >> > > > > >a diff to svn feels a bit unnecessary. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > >It woul have made my life easier certainly. Especially if I > >>didn't > >> > > have > >> > > > to > >> > > > > >convert from git to svn diffs in order to post reviews on > >>review > >> > > board. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > >Thanks, > >> > > > > >Radu. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > -- > >> > > > *Lewis* > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > >-- > >*Lewis* > > >
