+1
-- Jimmy On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 10:53 PM, Tom Barber <[email protected]> wrote: > 1000 times yes. > > I asked Chris about this a few years ago and he told me svn was fine now > he's a git slut..... I think that's the technical term. > > Anyway for those of us who live with rubbish broadband or who like > committing often but out of the main repo it's a welcome change. > > Tom > On 22 Aug 2015 1:55 am, "Lewis John Mcgibbney" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hi Valerie, > > Main rationale seems to be that most patches are comingr through Github. > > Therefore people seem to be pulling code from the github mirror at master > > branch as oppose to from SVN trunk. > > > > On Friday, August 21, 2015, Mallder, Valerie <[email protected] > > > > wrote: > > > > > I guess I can't really object. But, I don't really want to learn "yet > > > another CM system" :(. Would be nice to know the rationale behind the > > > change though. Why would this be considered an "improvement"? I haven't > > run > > > into anything yet that would make me dislike svn. > > > > > > > > > > > > Sent from my iPhone. > > > ________________________________ > > > From: Mattmann, Chris A (3980) <[email protected] > > > <javascript:;>> > > > Sent: Friday, August 21, 2015 3:50:01 PM > > > To: [email protected] <javascript:;> > > > Subject: [DISCUSS] Moving to Git (was Re: Moving repository to git) > > > > > > I would be fully supportive of this. > > > > > > What do others in the community think? If there are no objections > > > over the next week I’d like to call a VOTE. > > > > > > Note, Radu, that this wouldn’t mean “moving to Github”. Github != > > > Git != Apache. Apache has writeable Git repos (that run on ASF > > > hardware) and separately, Git mirrors that mirror and interact with > > > Github from the Apache gold source. Everyone should check out: > > > http://git.apache.org for more detail. > > > > > > Thoughts, please? > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Chris > > > > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. > > > Chief Architect > > > Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398) > > > NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA > > > Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527 > > > Email: [email protected] <javascript:;> > > > WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department > > > University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Radu Manole <[email protected] <javascript:;>> > > > Reply-To: "[email protected] <javascript:;>" <[email protected] > > > <javascript:;>> > > > Date: Friday, August 21, 2015 at 11:51 AM > > > To: oodt <[email protected] <javascript:;>> > > > Subject: Moving repository to git > > > > > > >Hello, > > > > > > > >Did you consider moving to git from svn as the main repository for the > > > >project? > > > >Especially since most of the pull requests are done from github, > > > >converting > > > >a diff to svn feels a bit unnecessary. > > > > > > > >It woul have made my life easier certainly. Especially if I didn't > have > > to > > > >convert from git to svn diffs in order to post reviews on review > board. > > > > > > > >Thanks, > > > >Radu. > > > > > > > > > > -- > > *Lewis* > > >
