hmm if that's the case we should just create 2 projects if we want tomee as tlpn *hope* it is no more true :s
*Romain Manni-Bucau* *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>* *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* 2012/11/19 Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > Well, the problem is that we would need to pick one package name. > > Afair the policy so far has been that all packages must be under the TLP > name. That was the reason why CODI also has > org.apache.myfaces.extension.cdi and not simply org.apache.codi. That was > the main reason for proposing two TLPs even if there is lots of overlap. > Not sure if this argument is still valid or if we could get an exception > from board though... > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Jacek Laskowski <[email protected]> > > To: [email protected] > > Cc: > > Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 10:41 PM > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] TomEE as the TLP name > > > > On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 4:04 PM, David Blevins <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> What do people think about renaming this TLP from OpenEJB to TomEE? > > > > Just to let you know I've read the thread, but still have no idea what > > the solution should be. TomEE is all over the place and eclipses > > OpenEJB. On the other hand, there's so little code-wise to say TomEE > > drives OpenEJB and not vice-versa. > > > > As of now, I'm fine with whatever consensus will emerge from the > discussion. > > > > Jacek > > > > -- > > Jacek Laskowski > > Functional languages (Clojure), Java EE, and IBM WebSphere - > > http://blog.japila.pl > > "Never discourage anyone who continually makes progress, no matter how > > slow." Plato > > >
