FYI cabin doors (plane) are closing back online in the morning. On Monday, November 19, 2012, David Blevins wrote:
> At this point we draft up a board resolution to amend our TLP name and > description and vote on it. Then we wait till next board meeting till its > official. > > The next board meeting is actually Wednesday morning, so not enough time > for a 72 hour vote, but that's ok. We have time. > > On Monday, November 19, 2012, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > >> So all is fine? >> >> What are we waiting for now? >> Le 19 nov. 2012 22:39, "David Blevins" <david.blev...@gmail.com> a écrit >> : >> >> > >> > On Nov 19, 2012, at 7:49 AM, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> wrote: >> > >> > > Afair the policy so far has been that all packages must be under the >> TLP >> > name. That was the reason why CODI also has >> > org.apache.myfaces.extension.cdi and not simply org.apache.codi. That >> was >> > the main reason for proposing two TLPs even if there is lots of overlap. >> > > Not sure if this argument is still valid or if we could get an >> exception >> > from board though... >> > >> > It's as much of a rule as we want to make it. Some popular Apache >> > packages that are not TLPs: >> > >> > - org.apache.derby >> > - org.apache.torque >> > - org.apache.yoko >> > - org.apache.xbean >> > - org.apache.woden >> > - org.apache.neethi >> > >> > If you use a clear brand, it's not a problem. If you do >> > "org.apache.naming", that's awfully frowned upon. :) >> > >> > If we want to change package names on code we can do that, but there >> > certainly won't be anyone forcing us to do that. >> > >> > >> > -David >> > >> > >> > > > -- > Sent from my iPhone > -- Sent from my iPhone
