Fully agree. TomEE as a TLP and OpenEJB as a subproject is the preferable solution IMHO.
JLouis 2012/11/14 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> > Hmm, > > If people on both projects are the same not sure it makes so much > sense...and tomee code is really really small and doesnt do enough work to > let it be another project IMO (in fact it only does integration so fixes > are mainly in openejb) > > Wdyt? > Le 13 nov. 2012 23:45, "Mark Struberg" <strub...@yahoo.de> a écrit : > > > What about having 2 TLPs? > > > > Actually OpenEJB is still very valuable as own standalone project. > > > > So I'd rather go for having TomEE AND OpenEJB as TLPs. > > > > It is already pretty much separated from the build structure. > > > > LieGrue, > > strub > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: David Blevins <david.blev...@gmail.com> > > > To: "dev@openejb.apache.org" <dev@openejb.apache.org> > > > Cc: > > > Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 4:04 PM > > > Subject: [DISCUSS] TomEE as the TLP name > > > > > > Since it came up in the other thread, good time to officially raise the > > > discussion on how we want to identify ourselves as a TLP. > > > > > > There have been concerns raised on how we identify to the public in > > terms of our > > > primary identity -- "the website says TomEE in letters as big as my > > > hand" was one quote. This was many months ago and my feedback then was > > > we're still experimenting and we need time to figure ourselves out. > > > > > > It's been a year since TomEE has been released and officially > certified. > > > The popularity is skyrocketing with no signs of slowing. As TomEE > > eclipses > > > OpenEJB it becomes more and more strange to call the TLP OpenEJB given > > our > > > website says TomEE all over it and that's all we present at > conferences. > > > > > > What do people think about renaming this TLP from OpenEJB to TomEE? > > > > > > > > > -David > > > > > >
