Am 07/28/2013 01:56 PM, schrieb janI:
On 28 July 2013 13:47, Marcus (OOo)<marcus.m...@wtnet.de> wrote:
Am 07/28/2013 12:37 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
On 24/07/2013 Hagar Delest wrote:
Huge thanks for such reactivity indeed.
But a lot of people are missing it due to the "portable" version being
too hidden in our download infrastructure.
What's the best solution to ensure that:
1) Users can actually find the "portable" version and
2) Users are correctly informed that this is a third-party port?
My proposal (subject to lazy consensus or discussion here) would be to
modify
http://www.openoffice.org/**download/<http://www.openoffice.org/download/>
as follows: add it to the line that says
Get all platforms, languages, language packs | Source Code tarballs and
SDK |
so that it becomes
Get all platforms, languages, language packs | Source Code tarballs and
SDK | Third-party and portable versions
and to link the additional text to
http://www.openoffice.org/**porting/<http://www.openoffice.org/porting/>
so that people are correctly informed. This also ensures that when/if we
have other portable versions available nothing needs to be changed.
To have a visible impression see here:
http://ooo-site.staging.**apache.org/download/test/**index.html<http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/index.html>
+1, is "portings" the right word ? my dictionary suggest "ports", but I am
no native speaker.
Hm, my favorite online dictionary says "portings". ;-) Let's see what
our native speakers will say.
Marcus
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
