On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 01:47:54AM +0100, janI wrote: > > The project must do ratscans actively. PMC members need the ratscan > > output in order to review IP License compliance. When you +1 > > a release this is something that PMC members must check. This is > > more important to get correct than the code quality. > > This is an interesting statement, I have never been presented with > a ratscan output even though I was PMC member when we voted for both > 4.0 and 4.0.1. I highly agree that ratscan is important, but I cannot > find the output in svn, would it not be a natural place to have it > together with the release ?
It looks like you didn't do your homework before voting, Jürgen usually posts the link to the ratscan output in the [VOTE] thread, for example: http://markmail.org/message/dtyu2zisyvismaqg http://markmail.org/message/cquhuieawf4jbx6j Besides, build-bot openoffice-linux64-rat runs the target weekly: http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/ Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Argentina
pgpaKPx3eStUB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
