On 3 November 2013 19:23, Ariel Constenla-Haile <arie...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 01:47:54AM +0100, janI wrote: > > > The project must do ratscans actively. PMC members need the ratscan > > > output in order to review IP License compliance. When you +1 > > > a release this is something that PMC members must check. This is > > > more important to get correct than the code quality. > > > > This is an interesting statement, I have never been presented with > > a ratscan output even though I was PMC member when we voted for both > > 4.0 and 4.0.1. I highly agree that ratscan is important, but I cannot > > find the output in svn, would it not be a natural place to have it > > together with the release ? > > It looks like you didn't do your homework before voting, Jürgen usually > posts the link to the ratscan output in the [VOTE] thread, for example: > http://markmail.org/message/dtyu2zisyvismaqg > http://markmail.org/message/cquhuieawf4jbx6j > it sure looks like it, thx for correcting me. > > Besides, build-bot openoffice-linux64-rat runs the target weekly: > http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/ > that runs on trunk, and not on the branches. rgds jan I. > > > Regards > -- > Ariel Constenla-Haile > La Plata, Argentina >
