> On Sep 2, 2016, at 9:48 AM, Jörg Schmidt <joe...@j-m-schmidt.de> wrote: > >> From: Dr. Michael Stehmann [mailto:anw...@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de] > >> Patricia, we are still discussing. We are balancing reasons, >> advantages >> and disadvantages, for different solutions. There is no decision made. >> >> And more and more I believe, it was a good idea to start that >> discussion >> on a public list. So everything is transparent. >> >> I like the debian Social Contract and point 3 is: >> >> "We will not hide problems" > > This is a reasonable approach for a project which is surrounded by friends. > > It is not necessarily a good concept for a project that has been cleaved by > third > parties and whose aim is to destroy it. When the TDF had only had the > intention to > make OpenOffice independent of Oracle, they would never have attacked AOO. > >
sorry, but I can't agree with that. Will self-serving trolls contort what we say here to promote their own agendas? Sure. What we want is the *truth* to be out there, so when these trolls spew their FUD, the reality of the situation is there for others to read, and understand, and grok. At the very least, if what you say is true, we can claim the high-ground. We should strive for that no matter what. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
