I don't have very much free time, but once MacOSX build instructions are rewritten and the process clean. I am willing to validate the instructions and each step on a fresh Mac. This would also put me a position to cast a binding vote on a release when that is ready.
Sent from my iPhone > On Sep 2, 2016, at 3:42 PM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: > > Yes, still VERY valid! > >> On Sep 2, 2016, at 12:37 PM, Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net> wrote: >> >> Hi Jim, >> >> I seem to recall that you made an offer to help with Mac builds. I know you >> helped during incubation. Is your offer still valid? >> >> Regards, >> Dave >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >>> On Sep 2, 2016, at 6:59 AM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>>>> On Sep 2, 2016, at 9:48 AM, Jörg Schmidt <joe...@j-m-schmidt.de> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> From: Dr. Michael Stehmann [mailto:anw...@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de] >>>> >>>>> Patricia, we are still discussing. We are balancing reasons, >>>>> advantages >>>>> and disadvantages, for different solutions. There is no decision made. >>>>> >>>>> And more and more I believe, it was a good idea to start that >>>>> discussion >>>>> on a public list. So everything is transparent. >>>>> >>>>> I like the debian Social Contract and point 3 is: >>>>> >>>>> "We will not hide problems" >>>> >>>> This is a reasonable approach for a project which is surrounded by >>>> friends. >>>> >>>> It is not necessarily a good concept for a project that has been cleaved >>>> by third >>>> parties and whose aim is to destroy it. When the TDF had only had the >>>> intention to >>>> make OpenOffice independent of Oracle, they would never have attacked AOO. >>> >>> sorry, but I can't agree with that. >>> >>> Will self-serving trolls contort what we say here to promote their >>> own agendas? Sure. What we want is the *truth* to be out there, >>> so when these trolls spew their FUD, the reality of the situation >>> is there for others to read, and understand, and grok. >>> >>> At the very least, if what you say is true, we can claim the >>> high-ground. We should strive for that no matter what. >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
