> On Dec 2, 2017, at 1:59 PM, Damjan Jovanovic <dam...@apache.org> wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 2, 2017 at 4:19 PM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: > >> Playing devils advocate, does it make sense to introduce >> Yet Another Build System at this stage? >> >> > I anticipated this question.
:) > > Secondly SCons can replace ./configure, so in all all-SCons world we would > eliminate 3 tools, not just 2. ./configure seems to work fine. > > * Nobody knows gbuild. And more people know SCons?? :) My point is that likely more people know make and gmake and its obscure features than SCons. What I don't want is some hybrid monstrosity like we have now. Nor do I want work on the build system to hold off release of 4.2.0. Just my own 2c and all the above IMHO --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
