Damjan, you forgot to post the patch on the thread. Peter Kovacs asked for a 
copy and I'm not sure if he's rec'd it.

> On Mar 20, 2018, at 3:24 AM, Damjan Jovanovic <dam...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> Does nobody understand, that with that run-time dynamic linking patch I
> wrote, and some extra work to resurrect gstreamer 0.1 support from SVN, you
> could build both gstreamer 0.1 and 1.0 plugins on CentOS 6, and then use
> whichever gstreamer version is installed at run-time?
> 
> Damjan
> 
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 10:34 PM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote:
> 
>> Does it make sense to have both gstreamer 0.10 and 1.0 as exclusive
>> options.
>> That is, enabling gstreamer during the build will determine what
>> version is supported and then use that?
>> 
>> ie, sort of merge how AOO415 and AOO420 currently do things related
>> to gstreamer?
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>> 
>> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Reply via email to