My sent emails show the patch was attached. Was it filtered out somewhere? On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 2:47 PM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote:
> Damjan, you forgot to post the patch on the thread. Peter Kovacs asked for > a copy and I'm not sure if he's rec'd it. > > > On Mar 20, 2018, at 3:24 AM, Damjan Jovanovic <dam...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > Does nobody understand, that with that run-time dynamic linking patch I > > wrote, and some extra work to resurrect gstreamer 0.1 support from SVN, > you > > could build both gstreamer 0.1 and 1.0 plugins on CentOS 6, and then use > > whichever gstreamer version is installed at run-time? > > > > Damjan > > > > On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 10:34 PM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: > > > >> Does it make sense to have both gstreamer 0.10 and 1.0 as exclusive > >> options. > >> That is, enabling gstreamer during the build will determine what > >> version is supported and then use that? > >> > >> ie, sort of merge how AOO415 and AOO420 currently do things related > >> to gstreamer? > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > >> > >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > >
