It must have been because it does not show up even on lists.a.o > On Mar 20, 2018, at 9:42 AM, Damjan Jovanovic <dam...@apache.org> wrote: > > My sent emails show the patch was attached. Was it filtered out somewhere? > > On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 2:47 PM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: > >> Damjan, you forgot to post the patch on the thread. Peter Kovacs asked for >> a copy and I'm not sure if he's rec'd it. >> >>> On Mar 20, 2018, at 3:24 AM, Damjan Jovanovic <dam...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>> Does nobody understand, that with that run-time dynamic linking patch I >>> wrote, and some extra work to resurrect gstreamer 0.1 support from SVN, >> you >>> could build both gstreamer 0.1 and 1.0 plugins on CentOS 6, and then use >>> whichever gstreamer version is installed at run-time? >>> >>> Damjan >>> >>> On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 10:34 PM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Does it make sense to have both gstreamer 0.10 and 1.0 as exclusive >>>> options. >>>> That is, enabling gstreamer during the build will determine what >>>> version is supported and then use that? >>>> >>>> ie, sort of merge how AOO415 and AOO420 currently do things related >>>> to gstreamer? >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >>>> >>>> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >> >>
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
