Sent from my iPhone
> On Aug 13, 2019, at 11:51 PM, Andrea Pescetti <pesce...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> On 13/08/2019 Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> Regarding the short git hash (vs. long git hash):
>> I can live with it. But if there is something fundamentally wrong with using
>> it (in our About dialog and on our download page) the Git gurus should speak
>> up *now*. ;-)
>
> Short is fine. I would honestly prefer something that is increasing with
> time, so something like "20190814-abcd123" as this is more informative (note
> I mean the date of the specific commit, not the build date; the two will be
> different in general).a
>
> I can take care of this when I have time for looking into it in case.
Are we discussing logic for the update process?
If so and switching to Git is one answer encoding a known progression and
following that to check for updates?
Put another way does switching to Git require careful discussion of update
scenarios?
Regards,
Dave
>
> Regards,
> Andrea.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
