Kohei Yoshida wrote:
Another point I want to mention is that, perhaps the UI design requirement at CWS integration time should be relaxed a bit. Instead of requiring UE approveal of the UI change at cws integration time, either QA or peer reviewer can pre-approve the UI and integrate the code first. And queue the final UI approval to IssueTracker as a new issue, assign it to UE (whoever that is) and set the appropriate target milestone so that he/she can finalize it later. If UE thinks that a UI change is necessary, request change to the developer so that the finalization takes place before the public release. This way, the process is asynchronous, and in line with our goal of fast track code integration.
Then we would end up with unfinished UI integrated into HEAD and potentially in a release. That's not good.
Niklas --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
