Matt Amos wrote:
> just because we're using ruby doesn't mean we have to use 
> rails+activerecord :-)

You mean I can put all the SQL back in amf_controller and get it running at
a reasonable speed again? ;)

cheers
Richard
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Ruby-developers-in-Amsterdam-tp21433520p21435286.html
Sent from the OpenStreetMap - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to