Matt Amos wrote: > just because we're using ruby doesn't mean we have to use > rails+activerecord :-)
You mean I can put all the SQL back in amf_controller and get it running at a reasonable speed again? ;) cheers Richard -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Ruby-developers-in-Amsterdam-tp21433520p21435286.html Sent from the OpenStreetMap - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev