On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 1:02 PM, Richard Fairhurst <rich...@systemed.net> wrote: > Matt Amos wrote: >> just because we're using ruby doesn't mean we have to use >> rails+activerecord :-) > > You mean I can put all the SQL back in amf_controller and get it running at > a reasonable speed again? ;)
not yet :-) if, in the future, we reckon that moving away from rails is worthwhile then the whole API will be changed. at present, having some bits rails-y and other bits not just makes it more difficult to develop, test and debug, in my opinion. cheers, matt _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
