I still miss javax.interceptor.InterceptorBinding. This class is not contained in geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec.
Where did it got moved to? LieGrue, strub --- On Tue, 1/19/10, Gurkan Erdogdu <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Gurkan Erdogdu <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: Interceptor API changes > To: [email protected] > Date: Tuesday, January 19, 2010, 1:45 PM > >>>Do you know what the > status is on the JCDI library with regards to the > TCK? > I have been working with TCK and it seems that there is no > problem so far. > > --Gurkan > > 2010/1/19 David Blevins <[email protected]> > > > > > On Jan 19, 2010, at 7:57 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote: > > > > I have looked, > >> > >> > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots-group/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec/1.0-SNAPSHOT/ > >> . > >> It is correct now. > >> But > >> > >> There are two versions of interceptor > specification in the repo, 1.0.0-EA1 > >> content is correct but 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT is not. > AFAIK, its version must be > >> 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT instead of 1.0.0-EA1. We use > 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT in OWB. > >> > >> > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots-group/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/ > >> > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots-group/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec/1.0.0-EA1-SNAPSHOT/ > >> > > > > I haven't run the final TCK against this library, just > the TCK from > > November, but it's probably safe to yank the EA. > > > > Do you know what the status is on the JCDI library > with regards to the TCK? > > > > -David > > > > > > > -- > Gurkan Erdogdu > http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com >
