ohhh, kk that explains a lot ;)

sorry, didn't catch that information.

A way to make this clear just in case other projects also get confused (and do 
not have the maintainer on board) would be to publish the 1.0.9-SNAPSHOT pom 
with packaging 'pom' containing only the information that is still not final 
and people should use EA1 instead. Basically the same like we did with javax.* 
artifacts for a long time.

txs and LieGrue,
strub

--- On Wed, 1/20/10, David Blevins <[email protected]> wrote:

> From: David Blevins <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: Interceptor API changes
> To: [email protected]
> Date: Wednesday, January 20, 2010, 3:10 PM
> Just a gentle reminder that
> 1.0.0-EA1-SNAPSHOT is the current  
> snapshot.  The 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT only ever existed for 10
> minutes when I  
> was creating the geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec module.
> 
>     
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>    r881915 | dblevins | 2009-11-18 21:13:53
> +0100 (Wed, 18 Nov 2009) |  
> 2 lines
> 
>    Adding "EA1" to version as this is still
> technically Early Access
> 
>     
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>    r881913 | dblevins | 2009-11-18 21:09:36
> +0100 (Wed, 18 Nov 2009) |  
> 2 lines
> 
>    Rolled version to 1.1
> 
>     
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>    r881909 | dblevins | 2009-11-18 21:03:59
> +0100 (Wed, 18 Nov 2009) |  
> 2 lines
> 
>    Interceptor 1.1 API
> 
> 
> We could switch it over to something that is not "EA" but
> it would  
> still have to be a pre-final number.  We won't be able
> to release a  
> final "1.0" version number till it passes the final TCK
> which we  
> haven't gotten yet.
> 
> -David
> 
> 
> On Jan 20, 2010, at 1:59 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
> 
> > The code has already written, look
> >
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/trunk/geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec/src/main/java/javax/interceptor/
> >
> > But it must be published to SNAPSHOT repository.
> >
> > --Gurkan
> >
> >
> > 2010/1/20 Mark Struberg <[email protected]>
> >
> >> I still miss javax.interceptor.InterceptorBinding.
> This class is not
> >> contained in geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec.
> >>
> >> Where did it got moved to?
> >>
> >> LieGrue,
> >> strub
> >>
> >> --- On Tue, 1/19/10, Gurkan Erdogdu <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> From: Gurkan Erdogdu <[email protected]>
> >>> Subject: Re: Interceptor API changes
> >>> To: [email protected]
> >>> Date: Tuesday, January 19, 2010, 1:45 PM
> >>>>>> Do you know what the
> >>> status is on the JCDI library with regards to
> the
> >>> TCK?
> >>> I have been working with TCK and it seems that
> there is no
> >>> problem so far.
> >>>
> >>> --Gurkan
> >>>
> >>> 2010/1/19 David Blevins <[email protected]>
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Jan 19, 2010, at 7:57 AM, Gurkan
> Erdogdu wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> I have looked,
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots-group/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec/1.0-SNAPSHOT/
> >>>>> .
> >>>>> It is correct now.
> >>>>> But
> >>>>>
> >>>>> There are two versions of interceptor
> >>> specification in the repo, 1.0.0-EA1
> >>>>> content is correct but 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT
> is not.
> >>> AFAIK, its version must be
> >>>>> 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT instead of 1.0.0-EA1.
> We use
> >>> 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT in OWB.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots-group/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots-group/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec/1.0.0-EA1-SNAPSHOT/
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> I haven't run the final TCK against this
> library, just
> >>> the TCK from
> >>>> November, but it's probably safe to yank
> the EA.
> >>>>
> >>>> Do you know what the status is on the JCDI
> library
> >>> with regards to the TCK?
> >>>>
> >>>> -David
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Gurkan Erdogdu
> >>> http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > -- 
> > Gurkan Erdogdu
> > http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com
> 
> 



Reply via email to