That sounds cool. Send me a pom and I'll push it up!
-David
On Jan 20, 2010, at 6:21 PM, Mark Struberg wrote:
ohhh, kk that explains a lot ;)
sorry, didn't catch that information.
A way to make this clear just in case other projects also get
confused (and do not have the maintainer on board) would be to
publish the 1.0.9-SNAPSHOT pom with packaging 'pom' containing only
the information that is still not final and people should use EA1
instead. Basically the same like we did with javax.* artifacts for a
long time.
txs and LieGrue,
strub
--- On Wed, 1/20/10, David Blevins <david.blev...@visi.com> wrote:
From: David Blevins <david.blev...@visi.com>
Subject: Re: Interceptor API changes
To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
Date: Wednesday, January 20, 2010, 3:10 PM
Just a gentle reminder that
1.0.0-EA1-SNAPSHOT is the current
snapshot. The 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT only ever existed for 10
minutes when I
was creating the geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec module.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r881915 | dblevins | 2009-11-18 21:13:53
+0100 (Wed, 18 Nov 2009) |
2 lines
Adding "EA1" to version as this is still
technically Early Access
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r881913 | dblevins | 2009-11-18 21:09:36
+0100 (Wed, 18 Nov 2009) |
2 lines
Rolled version to 1.1
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r881909 | dblevins | 2009-11-18 21:03:59
+0100 (Wed, 18 Nov 2009) |
2 lines
Interceptor 1.1 API
We could switch it over to something that is not "EA" but
it would
still have to be a pre-final number. We won't be able
to release a
final "1.0" version number till it passes the final TCK
which we
haven't gotten yet.
-David
On Jan 20, 2010, at 1:59 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
The code has already written, look
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/trunk/geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec/src/main/java/javax/interceptor/
But it must be published to SNAPSHOT repository.
--Gurkan
2010/1/20 Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de>
I still miss javax.interceptor.InterceptorBinding.
This class is not
contained in geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec.
Where did it got moved to?
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Tue, 1/19/10, Gurkan Erdogdu <cgurkanerdo...@gmail.com>
wrote:
From: Gurkan Erdogdu <cgurkanerdo...@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Interceptor API changes
To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
Date: Tuesday, January 19, 2010, 1:45 PM
Do you know what the
status is on the JCDI library with regards to
the
TCK?
I have been working with TCK and it seems that
there is no
problem so far.
--Gurkan
2010/1/19 David Blevins <david.blev...@visi.com>
On Jan 19, 2010, at 7:57 AM, Gurkan
Erdogdu wrote:
I have looked,
https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots-group/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec/1.0-SNAPSHOT/
.
It is correct now.
But
There are two versions of interceptor
specification in the repo, 1.0.0-EA1
content is correct but 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT
is not.
AFAIK, its version must be
1.0.0-SNAPSHOT instead of 1.0.0-EA1.
We use
1.0.0-SNAPSHOT in OWB.
https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots-group/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/
https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots-group/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec/1.0.0-EA1-SNAPSHOT/
I haven't run the final TCK against this
library, just
the TCK from
November, but it's probably safe to yank
the EA.
Do you know what the status is on the JCDI
library
with regards to the TCK?
-David
--
Gurkan Erdogdu
http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com
--
Gurkan Erdogdu
http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com
