Haha, ok looks like Rick removed them in revision 899623 on Friday.
With the pending M4 release we'll have to put some kind of non-final
looking prefix on them so they can be released before the M4. I'll
kick off a thread on the d...@g list and see if we can't get something
workable in place.
-David
On Jan 21, 2010, at 12:43 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
something like that one (rename to pom.xml again) should do the trick.
But I'm slightly confused. I updated the geronimo-specs trunk and
the current version is 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT and not -EA1. Where did that
went?
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Wed, 1/20/10, David Blevins <[email protected]> wrote:
From: David Blevins <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Interceptor API changes
To: [email protected]
Date: Wednesday, January 20, 2010, 11:50 PM
That sounds cool. Send me a pom
and I'll push it up!
-David
On Jan 20, 2010, at 6:21 PM, Mark Struberg wrote:
ohhh, kk that explains a lot ;)
sorry, didn't catch that information.
A way to make this clear just in case other projects
also get
confused (and do not have the maintainer on board)
would be to
publish the 1.0.9-SNAPSHOT pom with packaging 'pom'
containing only
the information that is still not final and people
should use EA1
instead. Basically the same like we did with javax.*
artifacts for a
long time.
txs and LieGrue,
strub
--- On Wed, 1/20/10, David Blevins <[email protected]>
wrote:
From: David Blevins <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Interceptor API changes
To: [email protected]
Date: Wednesday, January 20, 2010, 3:10 PM
Just a gentle reminder that
1.0.0-EA1-SNAPSHOT is the current
snapshot. The 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT only ever
existed for 10
minutes when I
was creating the geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec
module.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r881915 | dblevins | 2009-11-18
21:13:53
+0100 (Wed, 18 Nov 2009) |
2 lines
Adding "EA1" to version as this is
still
technically Early Access
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r881913 | dblevins | 2009-11-18
21:09:36
+0100 (Wed, 18 Nov 2009) |
2 lines
Rolled version to 1.1
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r881909 | dblevins | 2009-11-18
21:03:59
+0100 (Wed, 18 Nov 2009) |
2 lines
Interceptor 1.1 API
We could switch it over to something that is not
"EA" but
it would
still have to be a pre-final number. We
won't be able
to release a
final "1.0" version number till it passes the
final TCK
which we
haven't gotten yet.
-David
On Jan 20, 2010, at 1:59 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu
wrote:
The code has already written, look
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/trunk/geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec/src/main/java/javax/interceptor/
But it must be published to SNAPSHOT
repository.
--Gurkan
2010/1/20 Mark Struberg <[email protected]>
I still miss
javax.interceptor.InterceptorBinding.
This class is not
contained in
geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec.
Where did it got moved to?
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Tue, 1/19/10, Gurkan Erdogdu <[email protected]>
wrote:
From: Gurkan Erdogdu <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Interceptor API changes
To: [email protected]
Date: Tuesday, January 19, 2010, 1:45
PM
Do you know what the
status is on the JCDI library with
regards to
the
TCK?
I have been working with TCK and it
seems that
there is no
problem so far.
--Gurkan
2010/1/19 David Blevins <[email protected]>
On Jan 19, 2010, at 7:57 AM,
Gurkan
Erdogdu wrote:
I have looked,
https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots-group/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec/1.0-SNAPSHOT/
.
It is correct now.
But
There are two versions of
interceptor
specification in the repo, 1.0.0-EA1
content is correct but
1.0.0-SNAPSHOT
is not.
AFAIK, its version must be
1.0.0-SNAPSHOT instead of
1.0.0-EA1.
We use
1.0.0-SNAPSHOT in OWB.
https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots-group/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/
https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots-group/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec/1.0.0-EA1-SNAPSHOT/
I haven't run the final TCK
against this
library, just
the TCK from
November, but it's probably safe
to yank
the EA.
Do you know what the status is on
the JCDI
library
with regards to the TCK?
-David
--
Gurkan Erdogdu
http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com
--
Gurkan Erdogdu
http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com
<interceprot-1.1.-moved-pom.xml>
