Well im happy with the spi option but since it would be in impl not sure we need to slow down the boot instead of hardcoding it. Or did you mean in term of codepath but still bypassing service loader?
Side note: we should align reflection on xbean which supports meta annotation and potentially aliasing, this is a bug between scanning and runtime model we have today - see @Meta or @Metaroot support in xbean. That said it is another topic ;). Le lun. 6 mai 2019 à 15:45, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid> a écrit : > Hmm, nah, too memory intense and slower than the other solution I'd say. > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > Am 06.05.2019 um 14:41 schrieb Arne Limburg < > arne.limb...@openknowledge.de>: > > > > Hmm, > > thinking more of it: > > Shouldn't it be just an Extension that adds an @Inject Annotation to > every Field and Method parameter that has a qualifier? > > > > Cheers, > > Arne > > > > -- > > Arne Limburg – Enterprise Architect > > > > > > > > OPEN KNOWLEDGE GmbH > > Poststraße 1, 26122 Oldenburg > > Mobil: +49 151 - 108 22 942 > > Tel: +49 441 - 4082-154 > > Fax: +49 441 - 4082-111 > > arne.limb...@openknowledge.de > > www.openknowledge.de > > > > Registergericht: Amtsgericht Oldenburg, HRB 4670 > > Geschäftsführer: Lars Röwekamp, Jens Schumann > > > > Nächste Konferenz: > > > > Java Forum Nord | Hannover | 24. September 2019 > > > > Nächste Akademie: > > > > API, Microservices & DDD Summit | München | 17. - 19. Juni 2019 > > > > Treffen Sie uns auf weiteren Konferenzen, > > Summits und Events: > > > > Zu unseren weiteren Events > > > > > > > > Am 06.05.19, 14:06 schrieb "Gerhard Petracek" <gpetra...@apache.org>: > > > > hi romain, > > > > some years ago i tried to do something similar (afair with owb 1.0.x) > > based on our plugin-spi. > > back then it was just possible via a plugin for resource-injection > > (and it was a bit "tricky"). > > if nothing changed in the meantime, we should take the chance to add a > > more powerful injection-spi (to allow multiple plugins which can > > participate in the "injection-lifecycle"). > > -> your approach would be one of many plugins users can add (e.g. with > > auto. activation...). > > > > regards, > > gerhard > > > > Am So., 5. Mai 2019 um 22:09 Uhr schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau > > <rmannibu...@gmail.com>: > >> > >> Good catch! > >> > >> If no objection i can push a first version like on friday I think. > >> > >> Le dim. 5 mai 2019 à 21:58, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid> a > >> écrit : > >> > >>> And NO @Produces.... > >>> > >>> LieGrue, > >>> Strub > >>> > >>>> Am 05.05.2019 um 20:07 schrieb Arne Limburg < > >>> arne.limb...@openknowledge.de>: > >>>> > >>>> I > >>>> OPEN KNOWLEDGE GmbH > >>>> Poststraße 1, 26122 Oldenburg > >>>> Mobil: +49 151 - 108 22 942 > >>>> Tel: +49 441 - 4082-154 > >>>> Fax: +49 441 - 4082-111 > >>>> arne.limb...@openknowledge.de > >>>> www.openknowledge.de > >>>> > >>>> Registergericht: Amtsgericht Oldenburg, HRB 4670 > >>>> Geschäftsführer: Lars Röwekamp, Jens Schumann > >>>> > >>>> Nächste Konferenz: > >>>> > >>>> Jax | Mainz | 6. - 10. Mai 2019 > >>>> > >>>> Nächste Akademie: > >>>> > >>>> API, Microservices & DDD Summit | München | 17. - 19. Juni 2019 > >>>> > >>>> Treffen Sie uns auf weiteren Konferenzen, > >>>> Summits und Events: > >>>> > >>>> Zu unseren weiteren Events > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> am fine with that. I even thought of that before, when I wanted to add > >>> @PersistenceContext as qualifier to implement injection of > EntityManager by > >>> myself in a pure CDI-Scenario. > >>>> > >>>> Cheers, > >>>> Arne > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Arne Limburg – Enterprise Architect > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Am 05.05.19, 19:39 schrieb "Romain Manni-Bucau" < > rmannibu...@gmail.com > >>>> : > >>>> > >>>> Hi guys, > >>>> > >>>> Quarkus makes @Inject optional for MP qualifiers, can we add a flag > >>> to get > >>>> it? I.e. injection point is defined if inject is there or there is a > >>>> qualifier (even without inject)? > >>>> > >>>> It can probably be extended to delegate too - but less common. > >>>> > >>>> Guess it can be on by default but fine if you prefer it off too to > >>>> encourage portability. > >>>> > >>>> Wdyt? > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > > > > > >
