Hmm, nah, too memory intense and slower than the other solution I'd say. LieGrue, strub
> Am 06.05.2019 um 14:41 schrieb Arne Limburg <arne.limb...@openknowledge.de>: > > Hmm, > thinking more of it: > Shouldn't it be just an Extension that adds an @Inject Annotation to every > Field and Method parameter that has a qualifier? > > Cheers, > Arne > > -- > Arne Limburg – Enterprise Architect > > > > OPEN KNOWLEDGE GmbH > Poststraße 1, 26122 Oldenburg > Mobil: +49 151 - 108 22 942 > Tel: +49 441 - 4082-154 > Fax: +49 441 - 4082-111 > arne.limb...@openknowledge.de > www.openknowledge.de > > Registergericht: Amtsgericht Oldenburg, HRB 4670 > Geschäftsführer: Lars Röwekamp, Jens Schumann > > Nächste Konferenz: > > Java Forum Nord | Hannover | 24. September 2019 > > Nächste Akademie: > > API, Microservices & DDD Summit | München | 17. - 19. Juni 2019 > > Treffen Sie uns auf weiteren Konferenzen, > Summits und Events: > > Zu unseren weiteren Events > > > > Am 06.05.19, 14:06 schrieb "Gerhard Petracek" <gpetra...@apache.org>: > > hi romain, > > some years ago i tried to do something similar (afair with owb 1.0.x) > based on our plugin-spi. > back then it was just possible via a plugin for resource-injection > (and it was a bit "tricky"). > if nothing changed in the meantime, we should take the chance to add a > more powerful injection-spi (to allow multiple plugins which can > participate in the "injection-lifecycle"). > -> your approach would be one of many plugins users can add (e.g. with > auto. activation...). > > regards, > gerhard > > Am So., 5. Mai 2019 um 22:09 Uhr schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau > <rmannibu...@gmail.com>: >> >> Good catch! >> >> If no objection i can push a first version like on friday I think. >> >> Le dim. 5 mai 2019 à 21:58, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid> a >> écrit : >> >>> And NO @Produces.... >>> >>> LieGrue, >>> Strub >>> >>>> Am 05.05.2019 um 20:07 schrieb Arne Limburg < >>> arne.limb...@openknowledge.de>: >>>> >>>> I >>>> OPEN KNOWLEDGE GmbH >>>> Poststraße 1, 26122 Oldenburg >>>> Mobil: +49 151 - 108 22 942 >>>> Tel: +49 441 - 4082-154 >>>> Fax: +49 441 - 4082-111 >>>> arne.limb...@openknowledge.de >>>> www.openknowledge.de >>>> >>>> Registergericht: Amtsgericht Oldenburg, HRB 4670 >>>> Geschäftsführer: Lars Röwekamp, Jens Schumann >>>> >>>> Nächste Konferenz: >>>> >>>> Jax | Mainz | 6. - 10. Mai 2019 >>>> >>>> Nächste Akademie: >>>> >>>> API, Microservices & DDD Summit | München | 17. - 19. Juni 2019 >>>> >>>> Treffen Sie uns auf weiteren Konferenzen, >>>> Summits und Events: >>>> >>>> Zu unseren weiteren Events >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> am fine with that. I even thought of that before, when I wanted to add >>> @PersistenceContext as qualifier to implement injection of EntityManager by >>> myself in a pure CDI-Scenario. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Arne >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Arne Limburg – Enterprise Architect >>>> >>>> >>>> Am 05.05.19, 19:39 schrieb "Romain Manni-Bucau" <rmannibu...@gmail.com >>>> : >>>> >>>> Hi guys, >>>> >>>> Quarkus makes @Inject optional for MP qualifiers, can we add a flag >>> to get >>>> it? I.e. injection point is defined if inject is there or there is a >>>> qualifier (even without inject)? >>>> >>>> It can probably be extended to delegate too - but less common. >>>> >>>> Guess it can be on by default but fine if you prefer it off too to >>>> encourage portability. >>>> >>>> Wdyt? >>>> >>>> >>> >>> > >
