Hi > Hi, > > Am 18.04.2013 22:15, schrieb Maruan Sahyoun: >> I'd think that we should start scoping out 2.0 - what will be covered under >> that topic. > > In addition I would see us doing additional bug fix releases and minor > > enhancements prior > > to releasing 2.0. My preference would be to branch out 2.0 and keep trunk > > for > > working on 1.x > Hmm, we already have a 1.8 branch, which can be used for further bugfix > releases. Do you want to use the 1.x trunk for a possible 1.9 release?
Yes, I think we should keep the current branch for 1.8.x as well as 1.9.x > >> as this would be clearer but maybe we should postpone that discussion until >> we have a better understanding what 2.0 means. > I don't want to start a discussion about possible changes at this point. > Whatever we will do, I'm pretty sure that there will be some api changes and > we should use this fact as basis for our discussion if we branch or not. > We should branch and as mentioned above I'd prefer that we branch 2.0 >> Maruan Sahyoun >> >> >> Am 18.04.2013 um 21:11 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler <andr...@lehmi.de>: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> what is our next target after releasing 1.8.0 and 1.8.1? >>> >>> We already started some discussions about that topic, but I'd like to have >>> clarification. Is it time to go for a 2.0 version? If we agree to that goal, >>> how should we proceed? Should we branch or simply use the trunk? >>> >>> I'd prefer to continue using the trunk. We are still able to release >>> bugfix versions using the 1.8-branch. Even a new 1.9 feature release >>> should be possible by branching the 1.8-branch. >>> >>> WDYT? >>> >>> BR >>> Andreas Lehmkühler > > BR > Andreas Lehmkühler > BR Maruan
