Using text patches is the problem as I see it. We should be using... something else. Doesn't git's functionality enable phasing out text patches?
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Scott Carey <sc...@richrelevance.com>wrote: > On the Avro project, several folk generate a patch using git and upload > that to the JIRA, it patches fine using unix 'patch'. > Why do you need to switch to svn to generate the patch? > > A committer needs to apply the patch to a location checked out with svn, > but that is trivial. > > On 3/27/12 2:26 AM, "Gianmarco De Francisci Morales" <g...@apache.org> > wrote: > > >My 2 cents, based on the S4 project experience so far (they have git) is > >+1 > >but later. > > > >The process with git is still a bit fuzzy and not fully integrated and > >standardized like the one with svn. > >I personally use git for all my dev work with Pig, but then switch to svn > >to generate the final patch. A bit cumbersome but not so bad. > > > >Switching now will generate confusion and is not that urgent in my humble > >opinion. > > > >Cheers, > >-- > >Gianmarco > > > > > > > >On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 01:27, Dmitriy Ryaboy <dvrya...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> There is a check box you check when you upload a patch. If we committed > >> without verifying you checked it, thats an unfortunate oversight. > >> > >> No, you cant send a pull request via github to apache. That's a github > >> (commercial entity) feature, not a git (open source vcs) feature. > >> > >> Yes you can post a link on a Jira and ask people for review prior to > >> submitting a formal patch. No that's not review board or Jira > >>integration. > >> > >> > >> > >> On Mar 22, 2012, at 5:59 PM, Russell Jurney <russell.jur...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > That is fine. Only committers can merge pull requests. Not a > >>problem. > >> > > >> > I've never signed anything, and committers take my patches. Works the > >> same. > >> > > >> > On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Scott Carey <sc...@richrelevance.com > >> >wrote: > >> > > >> >> > >> >> There is a legal issue as well. Uploading a patch to JIRA requires > >>the > >> >> user to grant apache license to use the code. A pull request from > >> github > >> >> does not. > >> >> This is all being hashed out elsewhere, none of us here are experts. > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> On 3/22/12 2:08 PM, "Russell Jurney" <russell.jur...@gmail.com> > >>wrote: > >> >> > >> >>> If there is already a trial going, the project would benefit from > >> >>> switching > >> >>> to git, as we could then (I think?) accept pull requests on github. > >> Maybe > >> >>> not, I'm not familiar with integrating multiple gits. Barrier of > >>entry > >> >>> for > >> >>> contributing would then drop dramatically, making happy for all. > >> >>> > >> >>> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Daniel Dai <da...@hortonworks.com> > >> >> wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>>> This can be done in the future but I don't see there is an urgent > >>need > >> >>>> for that. I'd rather wait for Apache to standardize the process > >>and we > >> >>>> can easily follow and switch, rather than become the first several > >>to > >> >>>> try and solve the infrastructure problem. > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Daniel > >> >>>> > >> >>>> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Jonathan Coveney < > >> jcove...@gmail.com> > >> >>>> wrote: > >> >>>>> If people don't know git or svn, they are going to have to learn > >>one > >> >>>> or > >> >>>> the > >> >>>>> other if they want to work with open source projects. It might as > >> >>>> well be > >> >>>>> git, since that's where things are going. > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> 2012/3/22 Scott Carey <sc...@richrelevance.com> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>>> Apache is currently doing a trial with git as the primary repo > >>using > >> >>>> the > >> >>>>>> CouchDB project. Other projects may be able to volunteer to join > >> the > >> >>>>>> trial, I'm not sure. > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> see http://git-wip-us.apache.org/ > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> I suggest that if you are interested in this join the apache > >> >>>>>> infrastructure-dev list. > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> On 3/21/12 9:57 PM, "Russell Jurney" <russell.jur...@gmail.com> > >> >>>> wrote: > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> What's the work? > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> Russell Jurney http://datasyndrome.com > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> On Mar 21, 2012, at 9:39 PM, Dmitriy Ryaboy <dvrya...@gmail.com > > > >> >>>> wrote: > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> All that's left is for someone to volunteer to do the work. > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> On Mar 21, 2012, at 9:17 PM, Russell Jurney < > >> >>>> russell.jur...@gmail.com> > >> >>>>>>>> wrote: > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> What do we have to do to be the first real project that uses > >>git? > >> >>>>>>>>> Let's do that. Or, let's just sink svn to github. > >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> It will propel the project forward. > >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> Russell Jurney > >> >>>>>>>>> twitter.com/rjurney > >> >>>>>>>>> russell.jur...@gmail.com > >> >>>>>>>>> datasyndrome.com > >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> On Mar 21, 2012, at 9:04 PM, Bill Graham > >><billgra...@gmail.com> > >> >>>> wrote: > >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> I think this is the tweet (lacking the entire discussion tree > >> >>>> that > >> >>>> we > >> >>>>>>>>>> had > >> >>>>>>>>>> re git) where I was pointing out that some incubator projects > >> >>>> were > >> >>>>>>>>>> using > >> >>>>>>>>>> git. > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/#!/billgraham/status/174744199407738880 > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Russell Jurney > >> >>>>>>>>>> <russell.jur...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> I think this changed, and you are now allowed. Looking for > >>the > >> >>>>>>>>>>> tweets. > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Russell Jurney http://datasyndrome.com > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 21, 2012, at 9:36 AM, Alan Gates > >><ga...@hortonworks.com > >> >>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> AFAIK Apache still does not support git as a primary > >> >>>> repository. > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> You > >> >>>>>>>>>>> can use the git mirror, which Pig does. If this has changed > >> >>>> (or > >> >>>>>>>>>>> when it > >> >>>>>>>>>>> does), I'm +0 on changing, by which I mean I don't care > >>which > >> >>>> we > >> >>>> use. > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Alan. > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 20, 2012, at 11:22 PM, Jonathan Coveney wrote: > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Would anyone be opposed to doing this? I think you can > >>apply > >> >>>> to > >> >>>> do > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> this > >> >>>>>>>>>>> via > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache, no? It would be nice to make git the first class > >> >>>> citizen of > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> choice... forcing developers to use svn to work with pig > >>is > >> >>>> just > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> another > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> barrier, imho. I thought this had been bandied about on > >> >>>> Twitter > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> and the > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> like, but not sure if it's been discussed seriously on the > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> listserv. > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Would love y'all's opinions on the matter > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Jon > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> -- > >> >>>>>>>>>> *Note that I'm no longer using my Yahoo! email address. > >>Please > >> >>>> email > >> >>>>>>>>>> me at > >> >>>>>>>>>> billgra...@gmail.com going forward.* > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> -- > >> >>> Russell Jurney twitter.com/rjurney russell.jur...@gmail.com > >> >>> datasyndrome.com > >> >> > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Russell Jurney twitter.com/rjurney russell.jur...@gmail.com > >> datasyndrome.com > >> > > -- Russell Jurney twitter.com/rjurney russell.jur...@gmail.com datasyndrome.com
