Some more info is available here, for the Cassandra project: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-4254 https://github.com/apache/cassandra http://wiki.apache.org/cassandra/HowToContribute
I have a proposal to make... since we're not yet up for this, but do agree that it is the future: what if we move Piggybank to github? We can do this at the hackathon we're having at Twitter - I forgot the date? On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 6:16 PM, Scott Carey <sc...@richrelevance.com>wrote: > Git was built with use case #1 being Linux developers exchanging patches > as text via e-mail. I am not sure what binary patch support Linus plans > or what it would help other than being more compact. One disadvantage is > that it is then hard to review simple changes by simply reading the patch > itself in a text editor. I have +1'd many near-trivial changes after only > glancing at the text of the patch. > > SVN is (slowly) catching up to have better patch features. 'svn patch' is > now in 1.7, 1.8 will enhance it, and eventually there is planned support > for git patch extensions. In the long run the differences between the > tools for day-to-day work will shrink from where it is now. Subversion is > planning 'svn shelve' to make it more git-like when working locally, for > example. > > On 3/27/12 10:43 PM, "Dmitriy Ryaboy" <dvrya...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >Could you enumerate the problems you have with text patches? > > > >I can think of 1, but would like to hear your list. > > > >Dmitriy > > > >On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Russell Jurney > ><russell.jur...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Using text patches is the problem as I see it. We should be using... > >> something else. Doesn't git's functionality enable phasing out text > >> patches? > >> > >> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Scott Carey > >><sc...@richrelevance.com>wrote: > >> > >>> On the Avro project, several folk generate a patch using git and upload > >>> that to the JIRA, it patches fine using unix 'patch'. > >>> Why do you need to switch to svn to generate the patch? > >>> > >>> A committer needs to apply the patch to a location checked out with > >>>svn, > >>> but that is trivial. > >>> > >>> On 3/27/12 2:26 AM, "Gianmarco De Francisci Morales" <g...@apache.org> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> >My 2 cents, based on the S4 project experience so far (they have git) > >>>is > >>> >+1 > >>> >but later. > >>> > > >>> >The process with git is still a bit fuzzy and not fully integrated and > >>> >standardized like the one with svn. > >>> >I personally use git for all my dev work with Pig, but then switch to > >>>svn > >>> >to generate the final patch. A bit cumbersome but not so bad. > >>> > > >>> >Switching now will generate confusion and is not that urgent in my > >>>humble > >>> >opinion. > >>> > > >>> >Cheers, > >>> >-- > >>> >Gianmarco > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> >On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 01:27, Dmitriy Ryaboy <dvrya...@gmail.com> > >>>wrote: > >>> > > >>> >> There is a check box you check when you upload a patch. If we > >>>committed > >>> >> without verifying you checked it, thats an unfortunate oversight. > >>> >> > >>> >> No, you cant send a pull request via github to apache. That's a > >>>github > >>> >> (commercial entity) feature, not a git (open source vcs) feature. > >>> >> > >>> >> Yes you can post a link on a Jira and ask people for review prior to > >>> >> submitting a formal patch. No that's not review board or Jira > >>> >>integration. > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> On Mar 22, 2012, at 5:59 PM, Russell Jurney > >>><russell.jur...@gmail.com> > >>> >> wrote: > >>> >> > >>> >> > That is fine. Only committers can merge pull requests. Not a > >>> >>problem. > >>> >> > > >>> >> > I've never signed anything, and committers take my patches. > >>>Works the > >>> >> same. > >>> >> > > >>> >> > On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Scott Carey > >>><sc...@richrelevance.com > >>> >> >wrote: > >>> >> > > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> There is a legal issue as well. Uploading a patch to JIRA > >>>requires > >>> >>the > >>> >> >> user to grant apache license to use the code. A pull request > >>>from > >>> >> github > >>> >> >> does not. > >>> >> >> This is all being hashed out elsewhere, none of us here are > >>>experts. > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> On 3/22/12 2:08 PM, "Russell Jurney" <russell.jur...@gmail.com> > >>> >>wrote: > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >>> If there is already a trial going, the project would benefit > >>>from > >>> >> >>> switching > >>> >> >>> to git, as we could then (I think?) accept pull requests on > >>>github. > >>> >> Maybe > >>> >> >>> not, I'm not familiar with integrating multiple gits. Barrier > >>>of > >>> >>entry > >>> >> >>> for > >>> >> >>> contributing would then drop dramatically, making happy for all. > >>> >> >>> > >>> >> >>> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Daniel Dai > >>><da...@hortonworks.com> > >>> >> >> wrote: > >>> >> >>> > >>> >> >>>> This can be done in the future but I don't see there is an > >>>urgent > >>> >>need > >>> >> >>>> for that. I'd rather wait for Apache to standardize the process > >>> >>and we > >>> >> >>>> can easily follow and switch, rather than become the first > >>>several > >>> >>to > >>> >> >>>> try and solve the infrastructure problem. > >>> >> >>>> > >>> >> >>>> Daniel > >>> >> >>>> > >>> >> >>>> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Jonathan Coveney < > >>> >> jcove...@gmail.com> > >>> >> >>>> wrote: > >>> >> >>>>> If people don't know git or svn, they are going to have to > >>>learn > >>> >>one > >>> >> >>>> or > >>> >> >>>> the > >>> >> >>>>> other if they want to work with open source projects. It > >>>might as > >>> >> >>>> well be > >>> >> >>>>> git, since that's where things are going. > >>> >> >>>>> > >>> >> >>>>> 2012/3/22 Scott Carey <sc...@richrelevance.com> > >>> >> >>>>> > >>> >> >>>>>> Apache is currently doing a trial with git as the primary > >>>repo > >>> >>using > >>> >> >>>> the > >>> >> >>>>>> CouchDB project. Other projects may be able to volunteer to > >>>join > >>> >> the > >>> >> >>>>>> trial, I'm not sure. > >>> >> >>>>>> > >>> >> >>>>>> see http://git-wip-us.apache.org/ > >>> >> >>>>>> > >>> >> >>>>>> I suggest that if you are interested in this join the apache > >>> >> >>>>>> infrastructure-dev list. > >>> >> >>>>>> > >>> >> >>>>>> > >>> >> >>>>>> > >>> >> >>>>>> On 3/21/12 9:57 PM, "Russell Jurney" > >>><russell.jur...@gmail.com> > >>> >> >>>> wrote: > >>> >> >>>>>> > >>> >> >>>>>>> What's the work? > >>> >> >>>>>>> > >>> >> >>>>>>> Russell Jurney http://datasyndrome.com > >>> >> >>>>>>> > >>> >> >>>>>>> On Mar 21, 2012, at 9:39 PM, Dmitriy Ryaboy > >>><dvrya...@gmail.com > >>> > > >>> >> >>>> wrote: > >>> >> >>>>>>> > >>> >> >>>>>>>> All that's left is for someone to volunteer to do the work. > >>> >> >>>>>>>> > >>> >> >>>>>>>> On Mar 21, 2012, at 9:17 PM, Russell Jurney < > >>> >> >>>> russell.jur...@gmail.com> > >>> >> >>>>>>>> wrote: > >>> >> >>>>>>>> > >>> >> >>>>>>>>> What do we have to do to be the first real project that > >>>uses > >>> >>git? > >>> >> >>>>>>>>> Let's do that. Or, let's just sink svn to github. > >>> >> >>>>>>>>> > >>> >> >>>>>>>>> It will propel the project forward. > >>> >> >>>>>>>>> > >>> >> >>>>>>>>> Russell Jurney > >>> >> >>>>>>>>> twitter.com/rjurney > >>> >> >>>>>>>>> russell.jur...@gmail.com > >>> >> >>>>>>>>> datasyndrome.com > >>> >> >>>>>>>>> > >>> >> >>>>>>>>> On Mar 21, 2012, at 9:04 PM, Bill Graham > >>> >><billgra...@gmail.com> > >>> >> >>>> wrote: > >>> >> >>>>>>>>> > >>> >> >>>>>>>>>> I think this is the tweet (lacking the entire discussion > >>>tree > >>> >> >>>> that > >>> >> >>>> we > >>> >> >>>>>>>>>> had > >>> >> >>>>>>>>>> re git) where I was pointing out that some incubator > >>>projects > >>> >> >>>> were > >>> >> >>>>>>>>>> using > >>> >> >>>>>>>>>> git. > >>> >> >>>>>>>>>> > >>> >> >>>>>>>>>> > >>>https://twitter.com/#!/billgraham/status/174744199407738880 > >>> >> >>>>>>>>>> > >>> >> >>>>>>>>>> > >>> >> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Russell Jurney > >>> >> >>>>>>>>>> <russell.jur...@gmail.com>wrote: > >>> >> >>>>>>>>>> > >>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> I think this changed, and you are now allowed. Looking > >>>for > >>> >>the > >>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> tweets. > >>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> > >>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Russell Jurney http://datasyndrome.com > >>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> > >>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 21, 2012, at 9:36 AM, Alan Gates > >>> >><ga...@hortonworks.com > >>> >> >>> > >>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> > >>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> AFAIK Apache still does not support git as a primary > >>> >> >>>> repository. > >>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> You > >>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> can use the git mirror, which Pig does. If this has > >>>changed > >>> >> >>>> (or > >>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> when it > >>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> does), I'm +0 on changing, by which I mean I don't care > >>> >>which > >>> >> >>>> we > >>> >> >>>> use. > >>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Alan. > >>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 20, 2012, at 11:22 PM, Jonathan Coveney wrote: > >>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Would anyone be opposed to doing this? I think you can > >>> >>apply > >>> >> >>>> to > >>> >> >>>> do > >>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> this > >>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> via > >>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache, no? It would be nice to make git the first > >>>class > >>> >> >>>> citizen of > >>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> choice... forcing developers to use svn to work with > >>>pig > >>> >>is > >>> >> >>>> just > >>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> another > >>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> barrier, imho. I thought this had been bandied about > >>>on > >>> >> >>>> Twitter > >>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> and the > >>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> like, but not sure if it's been discussed seriously > >>>on the > >>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> listserv. > >>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Would love y'all's opinions on the matter > >>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Jon > >>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> > >>> >> >>>>>>>>>> > >>> >> >>>>>>>>>> > >>> >> >>>>>>>>>> > >>> >> >>>>>>>>>> -- > >>> >> >>>>>>>>>> *Note that I'm no longer using my Yahoo! email address. > >>> >>Please > >>> >> >>>> email > >>> >> >>>>>>>>>> me at > >>> >> >>>>>>>>>> billgra...@gmail.com going forward.* > >>> >> >>>>>> > >>> >> >>>>>> > >>> >> >>>> > >>> >> >>> > >>> >> >>> > >>> >> >>> > >>> >> >>> -- > >>> >> >>> Russell Jurney twitter.com/rjurney russell.jur...@gmail.com > >>> >> >>> datasyndrome.com > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > -- > >>> >> > Russell Jurney twitter.com/rjurney russell.jur...@gmail.com > >>> >> datasyndrome.com > >>> >> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Russell Jurney twitter.com/rjurney russell.jur...@gmail.com > >>datasyndrome.com > > -- Russell Jurney twitter.com/rjurney russell.jur...@gmail.com datasyndrome.com
