As a Pinot community member who recently became a committer, I just wanted
to share my thoughts and reflect on what others have said on this subject.

> [Tim] Great work done by Startree employees in the current slack
workspace
+1

> [Yupeng] +1 to a separate slack workspace for StarTree related channels
+1

> [Subbu] It seems to me that to take an action like this with just a few
days notice is not the best.
+1

I believe we should discuss more and come up with an approach that benefits
Startree as well as the rest of the Pinot community.

Cheers,
Sajjad

On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 6:41 PM Seunghyun Lee <sn...@apache.org> wrote:

> We should definitely recognize Startree's contribution to expanding the
> Pinot community; however, it would have been nicer if we saw some
> discussion happening within the community before this decision has been
> made. As I mentioned in the above reply, the current Apache Pinot workspace
> was created as part of the project incubation process when the code was
> donated to the Apache Software Foundation from LinkedIn so I have thought
> that the Pinot community has owned the workspace.
>
> To move forward, I think that we should discuss and come up with the
> migration plan before this renaming takes place. I briefly looked into the
> ASF workspace (https://infra.apache.org/slack.html) and it looks that
> only ppl with "@apache.org" email (committer, PMCs) will get the full
> access. Apache Pinot community members who are not committers/PMCs will
> have issues with joining discussion channels. Although there is a way to
> invite "single channel guests" per-channel basis, I don't think that it's
> sufficient for the existing use case of our Apache Pinot workspace.
>
> Best,
> Seunghyun
>
> On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 6:04 PM Subbu Subramaniam
> <ssubraman...@linkedin.com.invalid> wrote:
>
>>
>> [I am on vacation, so I just saw this thread]
>>
>> Thanks for conveying your intentions, Tim. I see that others in the
>> community have weighed in as well, so the good thing is that our decision
>> will be based on what the community agrees to.
>>
>> As others have pointed out, we must certainly acknowledge the work done
>> by Startree in terms of building the community strength around pinot. Last
>> I saw, there were around 2000 members in slack. In terms of community
>> strength, therefore, the count is distributed across (perhaps) 100s of
>> vendors and individual contributors.
>>
>> It seems to me that to take an action like this with just a few days
>> notice is not the best.
>>
>> Definitey, +1 to having separate spaces for Startree customers and Apache
>> pinot. How this should happen is TBD
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>> -Subbu
>>  Pinot PMC
>> ------------------------------
>> *From:* Tim Berglund <tlbergl...@gmail.com>
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, May 25, 2022 11:55 AM
>> *To:* dev@pinot.apache.org <dev@pinot.apache.org>
>> *Subject:* Apache Pinot™ Slack Workspace Rename
>>
>>
>> Pinot Dev,
>>
>> I’m Tim Berglund. The barest intro of me: I run Developer Relations at
>> StarTree. I wanted to go over a change I’m making to our Slack workspace so
>> it is not a surprise to you and we have a chance to talk through any
>> questions.
>>
>> On June 1, 2022, we will rename the Apache Pinot™ Slack Workspace to the
>> StarTree Community Slack Workspace. Let me explain my thinking here.
>>
>> First, of the top ten lifetime contributors in this Slack, six are
>> StarTree employees, accounting for about 80% of messages. I’m concerned by
>> the StarTree-heavy presence in a workspace that borrows the Apache
>> branding. It made sense to name the workspace “Apache Pinot” when Kishore
>> first made it, but as its usage has evolved and will continue to evolve,
>> keeping the Apache name is not appropriate. StarTree is committed to making
>> Pinot famous—that’s my actual job, in fact—and to helping users of the
>> open-source project be successful with it, but we need to keep the
>> boundaries between the ASF and StarTree clearly defined. Renaming this
>> Slack is an important part of that distinction, and something I’d rather do
>> sooner than later.
>>
>> Second, the continued evolution of the workspace is sure to include
>> channels to support StarTree’s cloud service and other community-licensed
>> products we might release in the future. Our broad commitment to and
>> investment in the support and advocacy for Apache Pinot will remain.
>> Renaming of the Slack will not cause it to become a place for vendor sales
>> pitches. (Indeed, those are forbidden, and sales people who come into Slack
>> to sell will answer to me.)
>>
>> The Slack is home to many other community members who have no association
>> with the ASF at all, and of course will continue to be an inclusive space
>> open to anyone who wants to talk about Pinot. It’s our goal for it to
>> continue to grow and thrive, and for StarTree to continue to invest heavily
>> in it as a helpful and welcoming place.
>>
>> Warmly,
>>
>> Tim Berglund
>>
>> VP Developer Relations
>> StarTree
>>
>

Reply via email to