Joost: > As a Sun employee I just can solicit the use of the Sun provided builds. You should ask the NL-leads at [EMAIL PROTECTED] about it.
Nakamoto-san: From: Takashi Nakamoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [qa-dev] Double Mac OS X binaries Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 17:21:59 +0900 > As to Crashreports feature, told by Schnabel, and the past successful > records of official builds, in the case of 3.0.0 rc1 of Mac OS X Intel, > Sun build seems to be superior. Right? > Maho I don't know. As the QA project lead, I'm second to Andre and Joost. "this is what the MacOSX porting team decide" and "each n-l leads decide" So ask Shaun McDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> about en-US build. I'm just providing vanilla build with build logfor QA. IIRC, at least once Hamburg build and vanilla build were be different. Even the source code were different. Still I'm not sure how Hamburg team builds OOo. Joost? > On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 10:01:45 +0200 > Joost Andrae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I can second this. Sun is actively working on the MacOSX port and > > providing binaries for the x86 Aqua platform. It's up to each native > > language team which build they want to have distributed. As a Sun > > employee I just can solicit the use of the Sun provided builds. > > > For Mac OSX paltform, the decision should be taken by the Mac porting > > > team. In general I'd prefere the Sun builds, as with those builds we have > > > less differences to the other platforms (also build by Sun). Crashreports > > > can only analyzed for Sun builds (afaik). --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
