Hi,

Le 11 sept. 08 à 12:19, Maho NAKATA a écrit :


From: Takashi Nakamoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [qa-dev] Double Mac OS X binaries
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 18:36:50 +0900

From: Takashi Nakamoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [qa-dev] Double Mac OS X binaries
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 17:21:59 +0900

As to Crashreports feature, told by Schnabel, and the past successful records of official builds, in the case of 3.0.0 rc1 of Mac OS X Intel,
Sun build seems to be superior. Right? > Maho

I don't know.

If you don't know the advantage of your own builds, who can recognize
your bulids are better for official release?

*sigh*
Could you please read Andre and my e-mail again?

Andre Schnabel and I told that who is in charge for that
is in Mac poring team. I also told mac porting team lead
Shaun McDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in the former e-mail...

I'm a member of Mac porting team, but I cannot say which is better.
Again, you should ask Shaun McDonald about it.

I wonder what you provide your builds for.
Just providing vanilla builds.

Again and again citing my e-mail...
IIRC, at least once Hamburg build and
vanilla build were be different. Even the source code were different.
Still I'm not sure how Hamburg team builds OOo.

I am sure everyone is working very hard on OpenOffice.org and that does include Nakata-San. Nakamoto-San, I am sure you can help keeping this list polite and its atmosphere both productive and convivial.

Cheers,

Charles-H. Schulz.



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to