From: Takashi Nakamoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [qa-dev] Double Mac OS X binaries Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 18:36:50 +0900
> > From: Takashi Nakamoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: Re: [qa-dev] Double Mac OS X binaries > > Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 17:21:59 +0900 > > > > > As to Crashreports feature, told by Schnabel, and the past successful > > > records of official builds, in the case of 3.0.0 rc1 of Mac OS X Intel, > > > Sun build seems to be superior. Right? > Maho > > > > I don't know. > > If you don't know the advantage of your own builds, who can recognize > your bulids are better for official release? *sigh* Could you please read Andre and my e-mail again? Andre Schnabel and I told that who is in charge for that is in Mac poring team. I also told mac porting team lead Shaun McDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in the former e-mail... I'm a member of Mac porting team, but I cannot say which is better. Again, you should ask Shaun McDonald about it. > I wonder what you provide your builds for. Just providing vanilla builds. Again and again citing my e-mail... > IIRC, at least once Hamburg build and > vanilla build were be different. Even the source code were different. > Still I'm not sure how Hamburg team builds OOo. Thanks, -- Nakata Maho http://accc.riken.jp/maho/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
