Hi all, From: Per Eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [qa-dev] Double Mac OS X binaries Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 13:39:33 +0200
> Joost and Nakata, > > Is there any documentation within the qa project describing these processes a > little, that might help? As the QA project lead: 1. I don't know how en-US version for SUN providing RC packages are approved (I mean I'm not in charge of this), but I'm very sure that we (outside of Hamburg team) shoud not touch them. If you see some problems, raise issues in the RC phase prior is better. Attend Release meeting and explain why you think this is a stopper, and have discussions. 2. en-US packages by non-SUN: up to porting team. e.g., MacOSX PPC, FreeBSD, OS/2 etc, it is up porting team and their responsibilities. 3. each localized packages: up to each native lang team. We (Joost and Maho; QA project co-lead and lead) have same opinion about it. http://qa.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=dev&msgNo=11125 > It's up to each native > language team which build they want to have distributed. As a Sun > employee I just can solicit the use of the Sun provided builds. I'm not a Sun empolyee, and I respect Joost's opinion. My opinion, as the project lead of ja project and the QA delegate of Ja version: I don't do actual QA tests, therefore, it is up to testers. If testers find SUN version is good, I approve it. if testers find other builds are good, I approve it. If both are QA'ed without problem, I respect Joost's opinion; ask Joost to upload SUN version. If only other builds are approved, I ask Joost to upload non SUN version. Joost and all please trust me. I never say "my build is superior" in Japanese or English and everywhere! If someone say so, I'm hijacked :) Thanks -- Nakata Maho http://accc.riken.jp/maho/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
