I agree strongly with Bryan here. I do like Rafał's suggested approach of creating a namespace-compatibilty module if the package names will change (which, agreed, is probably long overdue).
Making it as easy as possible for the existing (small) user community to run with the new version will encourage verification of the quality - or bugs - as soon as possible. Dawid On 13/05/2014 14:46, Bryan Thompson wrote: > I think that the ability to roll forward and backward production code between > the current and the next release trumps everything else.
