I would really like to see Jewel in this release. The nightly builds dont work for me and I am blocked because of this.
BTW, can I be the release manager for this one? Thanks, Om On Fri, Apr 20, 2018, 8:53 AM Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> wrote: > Hi Piotr, > > What kinds of impact are you concerned about? I think Jewel should be > independent of MXRoyale for now, although we may use Jewel as the default > look for MXRoyale some day. > > Thanks, > -Alex > > On 4/20/18, 4:46 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Alex, > > I'm also fine with release. Does Jewel module in general may affect > build, > for example Alina's build once Alex merge all ? > > Thanks, > Piotr > > 2018-04-20 12:02 GMT+02:00 Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org>: > > > Hi Alex, > > > > 2018-04-20 5:05 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>: > > > > > So much for releasing early each month ;-) > > > > > > > > yep! :))) > > > > > > > I merged develop and uibase-classname branches into the MXRoyale > branch. > > > I'm thinking of merging MXRoyale into develop and cutting a > release. We > > > will likely continue creating new emulation components in MXRoyale > since > > > we are inviting new contributors so continuing work in MXRoyale > will > > > result in less breaking of the nightly builds. > > > > > > The emulation components are far from finished, but IMO, we should > > release > > > what we have. It shouldn't have impact on other component sets. > What do > > > others think? > > > > > > > I think that's ok, I still could not take a look at MXRoyale, but I > think > > is a good time > > to see what will be merged > > > > > > > > > > > > The Jewel stuff seems to be working, but we might want to create a > common > > > base class for the new className/classList code in Jewel. Or it > could > > > wait until next month. > > > > > > > For Jewel I think all is ok, after some days of trying themes stuff, > we > > should consider to remove "themes" > > folder for building directly, and we could split it the same way as > > "examples" (that are not build directly when we build royale-asjs). > > If we do this, we should let people know that they must first build > themes > > and then build royale-asjs. Just a suggestion. > > > > Regarding to include JewelUIBase class, I'm for do it, but I think > this > > should not stop these release, since is something internal > > Maybe I could have it done or not, I'm have many things on my plate > and > > don't know exactly how I'll be getting this done. > > > > So for me is ok to include MXRoyale and cutting a 0.9.3 release > > > > thanks > > > > Carlos > > > > > > > > > Anything else we need to add or remove from 0.9.3? > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > -Alex > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Carlos Rovira > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8c072c418de345acbb0608d5a6b454c3%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636598215807973526&sdata=3rxII8BoHbPEh6JmOXc9zpEBiiNMEcDpbYTZnkpJUaE%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > -- > > Piotr Zarzycki > > Patreon: * > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8c072c418de345acbb0608d5a6b454c3%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636598215807973526&sdata=Nv3WhatXm0bNEuF0eOBzA1AL%2FBBVPsYuebaTNJXP55s%3D&reserved=0 > < > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8c072c418de345acbb0608d5a6b454c3%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636598215807973526&sdata=Nv3WhatXm0bNEuF0eOBzA1AL%2FBBVPsYuebaTNJXP55s%3D&reserved=0 > >* > > >
