Jewel is in the develop branch and some updates are in MXRoyale that I will 
merge to develop after I finish reviewing Alina's PRs from last night.

What problems are you having with the nightly?  We should iron those out before 
starting an RC.

You are more than welcome to be the RM, especially if you are going to try the 
releasecandidate.xml scripts.  I am hopeful that some day cutting a release 
will be straightforward.  I will warn you that there might be some version 
number issues due to some recent changes in the Maven poms so make sure you 
have the time for it.

Thanks,
-Alex

On 4/20/18, 9:24 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote:

    I would really like to see Jewel in this release.  The nightly builds dont
    work for me and I am blocked because of this.
    
    BTW, can I be the release manager for this one?
    
    Thanks,
    Om
    
    On Fri, Apr 20, 2018, 8:53 AM Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> wrote:
    
    > Hi Piotr,
    >
    > What kinds of impact are you concerned about?  I think Jewel should be
    > independent of MXRoyale for now, although we may use Jewel as the default
    > look for MXRoyale some day.
    >
    > Thanks,
    > -Alex
    >
    > On 4/20/18, 4:46 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> wrote:
    >
    >     Hi Alex,
    >
    >     I'm also fine with release. Does Jewel module in general may affect
    > build,
    >     for example Alina's build once Alex merge all ?
    >
    >     Thanks,
    >     Piotr
    >
    >     2018-04-20 12:02 GMT+02:00 Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org>:
    >
    >     > Hi Alex,
    >     >
    >     > 2018-04-20 5:05 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>:
    >     >
    >     > > So much for releasing early each month ;-)
    >     > >
    >     > >
    >     > yep! :)))
    >     >
    >     >
    >     > > I merged develop and uibase-classname branches into the MXRoyale
    > branch.
    >     > > I'm thinking of merging MXRoyale into develop and cutting a
    > release.  We
    >     > > will likely continue creating new emulation components in MXRoyale
    > since
    >     > > we are inviting new contributors so continuing work in MXRoyale
    > will
    >     > > result in less breaking of the nightly builds.
    >     > >
    >     > > The emulation components are far from finished, but IMO, we should
    >     > release
    >     > > what we have.  It shouldn't have impact on other component sets.
    > What do
    >     > > others think?
    >     > >
    >     >
    >     > I think that's ok, I still could not take a look at MXRoyale, but I
    > think
    >     > is a good time
    >     > to see what will be merged
    >     >
    >     >
    >     >
    >     > >
    >     > > The Jewel stuff seems to be working, but we might want to create a
    > common
    >     > > base class for the new className/classList code in Jewel.  Or it
    > could
    >     > > wait until next month.
    >     > >
    >     >
    >     > For Jewel I think all is ok, after some days of trying themes stuff,
    > we
    >     > should consider to remove "themes"
    >     > folder for building directly, and we could split it the same way as
    >     > "examples" (that are not build directly when we build royale-asjs).
    >     > If we do this, we should let people know that they must first build
    > themes
    >     > and then build royale-asjs. Just a suggestion.
    >     >
    >     > Regarding  to include JewelUIBase class, I'm for do it, but I think
    > this
    >     > should not stop these release, since is something internal
    >     > Maybe I could have it done or not, I'm have many things on my plate
    > and
    >     > don't know exactly how I'll be getting this done.
    >     >
    >     > So for me is ok to include MXRoyale and cutting a 0.9.3 release
    >     >
    >     > thanks
    >     >
    >     > Carlos
    >     >
    >     >
    >     >
    >     > > Anything else we need to add or remove from 0.9.3?
    >     > >
    >     > > Thoughts?
    >     > > -Alex
    >     > >
    >     > >
    >     > >
    >     > >
    >     >
    >     >
    >     > --
    >     > Carlos Rovira
    >     >
    > 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8c072c418de345acbb0608d5a6b454c3%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636598215807973526&sdata=3rxII8BoHbPEh6JmOXc9zpEBiiNMEcDpbYTZnkpJUaE%3D&reserved=0
    >     >
    >
    >
    >
    >     --
    >
    >     Piotr Zarzycki
    >
    >     Patreon: *
    > 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8c072c418de345acbb0608d5a6b454c3%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636598215807973526&sdata=Nv3WhatXm0bNEuF0eOBzA1AL%2FBBVPsYuebaTNJXP55s%3D&reserved=0
    >     <
    > 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8c072c418de345acbb0608d5a6b454c3%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636598215807973526&sdata=Nv3WhatXm0bNEuF0eOBzA1AL%2FBBVPsYuebaTNJXP55s%3D&reserved=0
    > >*
    >
    >
    >
    

Reply via email to