OK.  I will have limited time this weekend but will look into build issues and 
give an all clear after verifying the nightly builds and fix the Maven build.

I don't have any deadline in mind for the release.  I'd rather prove that 
someone else can use the release scripts to cut a release.

-Alex

On 4/20/18, 12:25 PM, "[email protected] on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" 
<[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote:

    On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 9:33 AM, Alex Harui <[email protected]>
    wrote:
    
    > Jewel is in the develop branch and some updates are in MXRoyale that I
    > will merge to develop after I finish reviewing Alina's PRs from last 
night.
    >
    > What problems are you having with the nightly?  We should iron those out
    > before starting an RC.
    >
    
    I mentioned it here:
    
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.apache.org%2Fthread.html%2F994a7665521cc4a64b99a5fe00ef13d9b7205ea413d3acfdc4515e3b%40%253Cdev.royale.apache.org%253E&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C1ac68dad388b49679b1608d5a6f46f76%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636598491262175829&sdata=JWj7FPg%2FO0IewYxtLDla2mrluBQjlXG7hwF7zSmUldI%3D&reserved=0
    
    
    >
    > You are more than welcome to be the RM, especially if you are going to try
    > the releasecandidate.xml scripts.  I am hopeful that some day cutting a
    > release will be straightforward.  I will warn you that there might be some
    > version number issues due to some recent changes in the Maven poms so make
    > sure you have the time for it.
    >
    
    Sure, I would get like to get my hands dirty with this.  Unless you are on
    a strict timeline to release?
    
    Thanks,
    Om
    
    
    >
    > Thanks,
    > -Alex
    >
    > On 4/20/18, 9:24 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    >     I would really like to see Jewel in this release.  The nightly builds
    > dont
    >     work for me and I am blocked because of this.
    >
    >     BTW, can I be the release manager for this one?
    >
    >     Thanks,
    >     Om
    >
    >     On Fri, Apr 20, 2018, 8:53 AM Alex Harui <[email protected]>
    > wrote:
    >
    >     > Hi Piotr,
    >     >
    >     > What kinds of impact are you concerned about?  I think Jewel should
    > be
    >     > independent of MXRoyale for now, although we may use Jewel as the
    > default
    >     > look for MXRoyale some day.
    >     >
    >     > Thanks,
    >     > -Alex
    >     >
    >     > On 4/20/18, 4:46 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <[email protected]>
    > wrote:
    >     >
    >     >     Hi Alex,
    >     >
    >     >     I'm also fine with release. Does Jewel module in general may
    > affect
    >     > build,
    >     >     for example Alina's build once Alex merge all ?
    >     >
    >     >     Thanks,
    >     >     Piotr
    >     >
    >     >     2018-04-20 12:02 GMT+02:00 Carlos Rovira <
    > [email protected]>:
    >     >
    >     >     > Hi Alex,
    >     >     >
    >     >     > 2018-04-20 5:05 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <[email protected]
    > >:
    >     >     >
    >     >     > > So much for releasing early each month ;-)
    >     >     > >
    >     >     > >
    >     >     > yep! :)))
    >     >     >
    >     >     >
    >     >     > > I merged develop and uibase-classname branches into the
    > MXRoyale
    >     > branch.
    >     >     > > I'm thinking of merging MXRoyale into develop and cutting a
    >     > release.  We
    >     >     > > will likely continue creating new emulation components in
    > MXRoyale
    >     > since
    >     >     > > we are inviting new contributors so continuing work in
    > MXRoyale
    >     > will
    >     >     > > result in less breaking of the nightly builds.
    >     >     > >
    >     >     > > The emulation components are far from finished, but IMO, we
    > should
    >     >     > release
    >     >     > > what we have.  It shouldn't have impact on other component
    > sets.
    >     > What do
    >     >     > > others think?
    >     >     > >
    >     >     >
    >     >     > I think that's ok, I still could not take a look at MXRoyale,
    > but I
    >     > think
    >     >     > is a good time
    >     >     > to see what will be merged
    >     >     >
    >     >     >
    >     >     >
    >     >     > >
    >     >     > > The Jewel stuff seems to be working, but we might want to
    > create a
    >     > common
    >     >     > > base class for the new className/classList code in Jewel.
    > Or it
    >     > could
    >     >     > > wait until next month.
    >     >     > >
    >     >     >
    >     >     > For Jewel I think all is ok, after some days of trying themes
    > stuff,
    >     > we
    >     >     > should consider to remove "themes"
    >     >     > folder for building directly, and we could split it the same
    > way as
    >     >     > "examples" (that are not build directly when we build
    > royale-asjs).
    >     >     > If we do this, we should let people know that they must first
    > build
    >     > themes
    >     >     > and then build royale-asjs. Just a suggestion.
    >     >     >
    >     >     > Regarding  to include JewelUIBase class, I'm for do it, but I
    > think
    >     > this
    >     >     > should not stop these release, since is something internal
    >     >     > Maybe I could have it done or not, I'm have many things on my
    > plate
    >     > and
    >     >     > don't know exactly how I'll be getting this done.
    >     >     >
    >     >     > So for me is ok to include MXRoyale and cutting a 0.9.3 
release
    >     >     >
    >     >     > thanks
    >     >     >
    >     >     > Carlos
    >     >     >
    >     >     >
    >     >     >
    >     >     > > Anything else we need to add or remove from 0.9.3?
    >     >     > >
    >     >     > > Thoughts?
    >     >     > > -Alex
    >     >     > >
    >     >     > >
    >     >     > >
    >     >     > >
    >     >     >
    >     >     >
    >     >     > --
    >     >     > Carlos Rovira
    >     >     >
    >     > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
    > http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
    > 7C8c072c418de345acbb0608d5a6b454c3%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
    > cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636598215807973526&sdata=3rxII8BoHbPEh6JmOXc9zpEBiiNMEc
    > DpbYTZnkpJUaE%3D&reserved=0
    >     >     >
    >     >
    >     >
    >     >
    >     >     --
    >     >
    >     >     Piotr Zarzycki
    >     >
    >     >     Patreon: *
    >     > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
    > https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%
    > 7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8c072c418de345acbb0608d5a6b454c3%
    > 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636598215807973526&sdata=
    > Nv3WhatXm0bNEuF0eOBzA1AL%2FBBVPsYuebaTNJXP55s%3D&reserved=0
    >     >     <
    >     > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
    > https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%
    > 7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8c072c418de345acbb0608d5a6b454c3%
    > 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636598215807973526&sdata=
    > Nv3WhatXm0bNEuF0eOBzA1AL%2FBBVPsYuebaTNJXP55s%3D&reserved=0
    >     > >*
    >     >
    >     >
    >     >
    >
    >
    >
    

Reply via email to