I found the problem. Carlos, I don’t know why you changed the tokens in the config files, but changing them made them unrecognized and caused the FlexUnit tests to fail.
I reverted those changes. I don’t know what effects these changes had on the Maven build. Harbs > On Sep 2, 2018, at 12:01 PM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Both the develop branch and the merge branch are failing while building > Basic. The tests are failing: > > The revert-refactor branch (which I have been mostly using lately) compiles > with no issues. > > [echo] Compiling FlexUnitRoyaleApplication.swf > [echo] ROYALE_HOME: /Apache/royale-asjs > [echo] ROYALE_SWF_COMPILER_HOME: /Apache/royale-asjs > [echo] FLEXUNIT_HOME: /Apache/royale-asjs/in/flexunit > [echo] playerglobal.version: 11.1 > [mxmlc] MXMLJSC > [mxmlc] -debug > [mxmlc] -compiler.targets=SWF > [mxmlc] +playerglobal.version=11.1 > [mxmlc] +env.PLAYERGLOBAL_HOME=/Apache/frameworks/libs/player > [mxmlc] -swf-library-path+=/Apache/royale-asjs/frameworks/libs > [mxmlc] -swf-library-path+=/Apache/royale-asjs/in/flexunit/flexunit > [mxmlc] -define+=CONFIG::dummy,false > [mxmlc] +royalelib=/Apache/royale-asjs/frameworks/ > [mxmlc] > -output=/Apache/royale-asjs/frameworks/projects/Basic/src/test/royale/FlexUnitRoyaleApplication.swf > [mxmlc] -- > [mxmlc] > /Apache/royale-asjs/frameworks/projects/Basic/src/test/royale/FlexUnitRoyaleApplication.mxml > [mxmlc] 0.765562837 seconds > [mxmlc] /Apache/royale-asjs/frameworks/royale-config.xml(74): col: 0 > Error: configuration variable 'compiler.external-library-path' value contains > unknown token 'targetPlayerMajorVersion'. > [mxmlc] /Apache/royale-asjs/frameworks/royale-config.xml (line: 74) > [mxmlc] > [mxmlc] </external-library-path> > [mxmlc] > [mxmlc] > [mxmlc] /Apache/royale-asjs/frameworks/royale-config.xml(98): col: 0 > Error: configuration variable 'compiler.library-path' value contains unknown > token 'targetPlayerMajorVersion'. > [mxmlc] /Apache/royale-asjs/frameworks/royale-config.xml (line: 98) > [mxmlc] > [mxmlc] </library-path> > > I’m having trouble finding what changed. The royale-config file appears to be > the same when compiling with all branches. > > Harbs > >> On Sep 1, 2018, at 6:55 PM, Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Carlos, >> >> I will work on Monday on that. I'm going to take the simplest blog example >> and analyze why it is not displaying. >> >> DataGroup has definitely some conflicts, but I tried Data Binding blog >> example and it didn't work. - In that case I got some errors - you can >> check on your own if you have time over the weekend. >> >> Piotr >> >> On Sat, Sep 1, 2018, 10:34 AM Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org> wrote: >> >>> Hi Alex, Piotr, >>> >>> I merged few latest changes and I did and try integration branch. >>> Maven build pass localy wich is good! :) >>> But unfortunately some things are not right and Jewel Example doesn't work. >>> Don't know about MXRoyale, that Alex can report if changes work or not. >>> >>> Some of the problems are the changes did in TBodyContentArea and the >>> classes to add, remove data, but problems seems to go far from there. >>> I started to comment "sections" in Jewel example to avoid runtime errors, >>> and have to comment >>> TablePlayGround >>> and since DateChooser uses Table I had to comment >>> DateComponentsPlayGround >>> With this JewelExample runs without errors but Drawer Navigation doesn't >>> shows any option, but no errors are displayed at runtime. >>> >>> So I added in browser code "is-active" class to sections I want to display >>> to try other parts of Jewel and found that List based components are not >>> rendering item renderers (List, ComboBox,...) >>> or bindings are not working, or something is bad when trying to add the >>> items to the component. >>> >>> As Alex said the problem can be that things in develop can't be the latest, >>> if for example DataGroup has changed in MXRoyale and Jewel needs to be >>> adapted to that changes we need to know what changes are but I don't think >>> changing the code "blindly" will solve the problem. >>> >>> I think we should check point each commit to see where are the hot points >>> and fix them. >>> >>> I still need to fix some important things for release in develop, so I'll >>> be busy today and maybe tomorrow. With that done I can concentrate in help >>> with the release. >>> >>> Piotr, if you can discover the points of conflict and can share here will >>> be great, you can try to fix the problems, but test that changes work in >>> Jewel Example, other way is to share it here and I can try to fix it or >>> help you to fix it. >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> Carlos >>> >>> >>> El sáb., 1 sept. 2018 a las 1:00, Alex Harui (<aha...@adobe.com.invalid>) >>> escribió: >>> >>>> Please remember that an integration branch contains changes from two >>>> branches and when files get moved around, it is possible for changes to >>> get >>>> out of sync. What is in the develop branch may not be the "latest". >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> -Alex >>>> >>>> On 8/31/18, 8:08 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> I just merged to that branch latest changes from develop. Once you >>>> finish >>>> whatever you are doing, switch there and play with it yourself. There >>>> is >>>> nothing to discuss blindly before you didn't touch that branch. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Piotr >>>> >>>> pt., 31 sie 2018 o 17:01 Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> >>>> napisał(a): >>>> >>>>> Carlos, >>>>> >>>>> I cannot change it because itemRendererParent field is type of >>>> IItemRendererParent >>>>> [1] and that interface doesn't contains that method. Link [1] is >>>> pointing >>>>> to develop branch, but that interfaces looks >>>>> exactly the same in integration branch. >>>>> >>>>> [1] >>>>> >>>> >>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fblob%2Fdevelop%2Fframeworks%2Fprojects%2FCore%2Fsrc%2Fmain%2Froyale%2Forg%2Fapache%2Froyale%2Fcore%2FIItemRendererParent.as&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C03d39a0b3bcf42aaa6e308d60f53a672%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636713249295672168&sdata=O7rT8rBSMYflDORWgzl2V0UVI53FYHS%2BtalqjofG6qY%3D&reserved=0 >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Piotr >>>>> >>>>> pt., 31 sie 2018 o 16:19 Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org> >>>>> napisał(a): >>>>> >>>>>> Piotr, >>>>>> what I'm saying is that the whole fiel is created by me, and you >>>> have a >>>>>> line of code that is different to what I have in develop. So >>>> something is >>>>>> wrong in the merge to the integration branch. The line of code I'm >>>> posting >>>>>> is the right one and the one you should have in the integration >>>> branch. >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm still on develop fixing the 4 things I commented. When I >>> finish >>>> I'll >>>>>> be >>>>>> trying the integration branch. In the mean while, since that line >>>> is not >>>>>> right, can you change it for the one I posted?, If not when I >>> reach >>>> to the >>>>>> integration branch I'll change it myself >>>>>> >>>>>> thanks >>>>>> >>>>>> Carlos >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> El vie., 31 ago. 2018 a las 15:43, Piotr Zarzycki (< >>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Carlos, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Are you using this branch ? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Ftree%2Ffeature%2FMerge_MXRoyale_To_Develop&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C03d39a0b3bcf42aaa6e308d60f53a672%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636713249295672168&sdata=CEGPY7%2FfhU1H%2FioYlqcriKBxV9xKr2kpX08VlAu8dfU%3D&reserved=0 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Above branch need to be tested and my previous link pointing to >>>> sources >>>>>>> from that branch. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> Piotr >>>>>>> >>>>>>> pt., 31 sie 2018 o 15:39 Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org >>>> >>>>>>> napisał(a): >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi Piotr, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I don't have that line: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> itemRendererParent.removeItemRenderer(processedRow); >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I have this in develop: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> itemRendererParent.removeElement(processedRow); >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> How is this possible? is very strange :? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The item renderer is removed in the loop, the last line is to >>>> remove >>>>>> the >>>>>>>> row (tr) element from the itemRendererParent (tbody) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Can you change to this >>>>>> itemRendererParent.removeElement(processedRow); ? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> El vie., 31 ago. 2018 a las 15:31, Piotr Zarzycki (< >>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> No this is not that line. That's the next one which is >>>> commented >>>>>> right >>>>>>>> now. >>>>>>>>> [1]. Uncomment line to see error. Maven is failing with >>> error >>>> which >>>>>> is >>>>>>>>> valid[2] >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> [1] >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fblob%2Fed55aee86e92d36397a52cffd44df1fa56393c5f%2Fframeworks%2Fprojects%2FJewel%2Fsrc%2Fmain%2Froyale%2Forg%2Fapache%2Froyale%2Fjewel%2Fbeads%2FitemRenderers%2FRemoveTableItemRendererForArrayListData.as%23L135&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C03d39a0b3bcf42aaa6e308d60f53a672%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636713249295672168&sdata=QBETEI7kExsyHGiHJXFFlej1kU3vL7hA1FzQ0Vgf3IE%3D&reserved=0 >>>>>>>>> [2] >>>> >>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2F8mlQ&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C03d39a0b3bcf42aaa6e308d60f53a672%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636713249295672168&sdata=mp1oXWwCOZl1%2Fub5W86UW73mUdI7ChRjFpQOIeIociU%3D&reserved=0 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>> Piotr >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> pt., 31 sie 2018 o 15:23 Carlos Rovira < >>>> carlosrov...@apache.org> >>>>>>>>> napisał(a): >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Piotr, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> let me see if I understand the problem. That line: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> itemRendererParent.removeItemRenderer(ir); >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> is making compilation fail? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> That would be very strange since my compilation succeeded. >>>> and >>>>>> seems >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>> line is ok. If so it could be a similar problem to the one >>>> we saw >>>>>>>>> recently >>>>>>>>>> in witch compilation was ok localy but failing in the >>>> server. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Let me know about this problem to see what I should take >>>> care >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> thanks! >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Carlos >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> El vie., 31 ago. 2018 a las 15:13, Piotr Zarzycki (< >>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi Carlos, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Ok understand. Thanks for explanation. If you could look >>>> into >>>>>> that >>>>>>>> how >>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>> achieve that without build fail that would be great. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Piotr >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> pt., 31 sie 2018 o 15:11 Carlos Rovira < >>>> carlosrov...@apache.org >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a): >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Piotr, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Table component uses TBodyContentArea as IContentView >>>> instead >>>>>> of >>>>>>>>>>> DataGroup, >>>>>>>>>>>> so the IItemRendererParent needs its own >>> implementation. >>>>>>>>>>>> Inside TBody(<tbody>), we have each item render as a >>>> TableRow >>>>>>>> (<tr>), >>>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>> has inside a TableCell (<td>) and then the >>>> TableItemRenderer. >>>>>>>>>>>> So when adding, removing, and so on from the >>>> dataProvider to >>>>>>> manage >>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>> item renderers you need to create or destroy this >>>> structure. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> So if you see the code, you'll that I'm removing the >>>> cells >>>>>> inside >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>> row >>>>>>>>>>>> and the itemrender inside the cell so signaling the >>>>>> appropriate >>>>>>>>> removal >>>>>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>>>>> listeners. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hope this explanation solve your doubt >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> thanks >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Carlos >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> El vie., 31 ago. 2018 a las 12:50, Piotr Zarzycki (< >>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Carlos, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Question to one of your class. Why are you doing two >>>> times >>>>>>>> removing >>>>>>>>>> [1] >>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>> couple of lines later you are doing removeElement ? >>> It >>>>>>> shouldn't >>>>>>>>>> event >>>>>>>>>>>> work >>>>>>>>>>>>> because there is no method removeElement in that >>>> interface. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fblob%2F62265d52abdf34f797dc7582841ed029d8fb0cff%2Fframeworks%2Fprojects%2FJewel%2Fsrc%2Fmain%2Froyale%2Forg%2Fapache%2Froyale%2Fjewel%2Fbeads%2FitemRenderers%2FRemoveTableItemRendererForArrayListData.as%23L131&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C03d39a0b3bcf42aaa6e308d60f53a672%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636713249295672168&sdata=74MQ4rWiYDlL%2F0kAENWTKN713DmC4X5HVYFe2OGbeC4%3D&reserved=0 >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>>> Piotr >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> pt., 31 sie 2018 o 12:18 Harbs < >>> harbs.li...@gmail.com >>>>> >>>>>>>> napisał(a): >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> That change should be reverted. I added it to try >>>> and fix >>>>>> an >>>>>>>>> issue >>>>>>>>>>> with >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Express, but Express data grids don’t mix with >>> Basic >>>>>> columns. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 31, 2018, at 12:37 PM, Piotr Zarzycki < >>>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Harbs, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Some time ago you have added interface >>>>>> IDataGridColumnList >>>>>>>> [1]. >>>>>>>>>> It >>>>>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>>>>>>> used >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> here [2], couple of lines later there is >>>> assignment >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> list.itemRenderer = dataGridColumn.itemRenderer; >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But that interface doesn't have itemRenderer >>>> property >>>>>> and >>>>>>>> build >>>>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failing - locally. How actually it is working ? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fblob%2Fdevelop%2Fframeworks%2Fprojects%2FBasic%2Fsrc%2Fmain%2Froyale%2Forg%2Fapache%2Froyale%2Fhtml%2FsupportClasses%2FIDataGridColumnList.as&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C03d39a0b3bcf42aaa6e308d60f53a672%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636713249295672168&sdata=GxUmxFOCOhRUaE2U1LvCTLbCMK2jlK1wzU846W9CRKI%3D&reserved=0 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fblob%2Fdevelop%2Fframeworks%2Fprojects%2FBasic%2Fsrc%2Fmain%2Froyale%2Forg%2Fapache%2Froyale%2Fhtml%2FsupportClasses%2FIDataGridColumnList.as&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C03d39a0b3bcf42aaa6e308d60f53a672%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636713249295672168&sdata=GxUmxFOCOhRUaE2U1LvCTLbCMK2jlK1wzU846W9CRKI%3D&reserved=0 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fblob%2F75f379c72732cd208f535f6f029cfc0b2efe0ee4%2Fframeworks%2Fprojects%2FBasic%2Fsrc%2Fmain%2Froyale%2Forg%2Fapache%2Froyale%2Fhtml%2Fbeads%2FDataGridView.as%23L229&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C03d39a0b3bcf42aaa6e308d60f53a672%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636713249295672168&sdata=nmPWpzQOu1GRZ3g%2B3pOcYk%2FmW0YHuPD6yoysIPay%2F7k%3D&reserved=0 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fblob%2F75f379c72732cd208f535f6f029cfc0b2efe0ee4%2Fframeworks%2Fprojects%2FBasic%2Fsrc%2Fmain%2Froyale%2Forg%2Fapache%2Froyale%2Fhtml%2Fbeads%2FDataGridView.as%23L229&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C03d39a0b3bcf42aaa6e308d60f53a672%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636713249295672168&sdata=nmPWpzQOu1GRZ3g%2B3pOcYk%2FmW0YHuPD6yoysIPay%2F7k%3D&reserved=0 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Piotr >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pt., 31 sie 2018 o 10:33 Carlos Rovira < >>>>>>>>> carlosrov...@apache.org >>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> carlosrov...@apache.org>> napisał(a): >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Piotr, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for me its ok, but only want to point something >>>>>>> important. I >>>>>>>>>> think >>>>>>>>>>>> we >>>>>>>>>>>>>> all >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> invested many emails, hours in discussing about >>>> this. I >>>>>>>> think >>>>>>>>>> all >>>>>>>>>>>>>> positions >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are clear. I think we can discuss if things to >>>> bring to >>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>> plate >>>>>>>>>>>> are >>>>>>>>>>>>>> new, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but I'm afraid it could not be. My position is >>>> that we >>>>>> all >>>>>>>> can >>>>>>>>>> get >>>>>>>>>>>>> what >>>>>>>>>>>>>> we >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> want. I think is: 1) return things to basic 2) >>>> jewel >>>>>> can't >>>>>>>>> link >>>>>>>>>>>> basic, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> so >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it must create it's own versions. In case this >>>> could >>>>>> not >>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>>>> possible, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> create a JewelCore SWC. My latest experience >>>> creating >>>>>>> Jewel >>>>>>>>>>> versions >>>>>>>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DateField, DateChooser, Table, ComboBox and >>>>>> DropDownList >>>>>>>> show >>>>>>>>>>> that I >>>>>>>>>>>>>> was in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the right track, since the things I copied are >>>> modified >>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>> Jewel >>>>>>>>>>>>> since >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jewel needs other things and implementations. >>> In >>>> Basic >>>>>>>> there's >>>>>>>>>> too >>>>>>>>>>>>> much >>>>>>>>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the styles and view hardcoded in the main code >>>> and that >>>>>>>> means >>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> kind of code, for me, never can be generalistic >>>> piece >>>>>> of >>>>>>>> code >>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>>>> could be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reusable for all UIs. As well it seems Basic >>> UI, >>>> TLCs >>>>>> and >>>>>>>> CSS >>>>>>>>>>> don't >>>>>>>>>>>>>> want to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be separated and anyone wanting to extend it >>>> will need >>>>>> to >>>>>>>> deal >>>>>>>>>>> with >>>>>>>>>>>>>> those >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dependencies, what is not acceptable. Framework >>>> code >>>>>>> should >>>>>>>>> help >>>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> put >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Pilars of other high level things without >>>> the need >>>>>> of >>>>>>>>>> looking >>>>>>>>>>>> how >>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> workaround many things set up, this is what I >>>> find in >>>>>>> Basic >>>>>>>>> code >>>>>>>>>>>> when >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> trying to use in Jewel. It could be a way if >>>> things >>>>>> could >>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>>> change >>>>>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Basic for the better, but seems that many >>> people >>>> here >>>>>>> things >>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>>> Basic >>>>>>>>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> now in a near-final-shape, so no changes means, >>>> (I at >>>>>>>> least), >>>>>>>>>> can >>>>>>>>>>>> use >>>>>>>>>>>>>> it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And Jewel can't use. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Don't see other way. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Let's see this as we end this release. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Carlos >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> El vie., 31 ago. 2018 a las 7:27, Piotr >>> Zarzycki >>>> (< >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> escribió: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Carlos, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please do not move anything more. I think I >>> had >>>> enough >>>>>>>>> problems >>>>>>>>>>>> with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> current situations. I will deal with all of >>>> that as >>>>>> is. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My suggestion is to restart discussion about >>>> all of >>>>>> that >>>>>>>>> stuff >>>>>>>>>>>> after >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Piotr >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018, 12:18 AM Carlos Rovira < >>>>>>>>>>>>> carlosrov...@apache.org> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as we discussed, the package names was the >>>> revert we >>>>>>> said >>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>> do, >>>>>>>>>>>> so >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do a refactor of that package names, will be >>>> more >>>>>>>>> consistent. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regarding movement of pieces, in the case of >>>>>> DataGroup I >>>>>>>> can >>>>>>>>>>> move >>>>>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Core to Basic and create a version for Jewel. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Let me know if this is ok for you. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As well let me know if some more class is in >>>> Core to >>>>>>>>> consider. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> El jue., 30 ago. 2018 a las 19:18, Piotr >>>> Zarzycki (< >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was also thinking that this release won't >>>> have >>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>> changes, >>>>>>>>>>>> but >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unfortunately they are there. I had big >>>> headache to >>>>>>> make >>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>>>>> working. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you Alex. I will try to deal with all >>>> of that. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> czw., 30 sie 2018 o 19:12 Alex Harui >>>>>>>>>> <aha...@adobe.com.invalid >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a): >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I fixed the Maven build in feature/MXRoyale >>>> and >>>>>> merged >>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>> into >>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> integration branch. However, the Maven >>>> build in >>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>> integration >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> still failing. It appears to be because >>>> DataGroup >>>>>> got >>>>>>>>> moved >>>>>>>>>>>> from >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Basic >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Core. The Ant build should be failing >>> there >>>> too. >>>>>> I >>>>>>> was >>>>>>>>>> under >>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> impression that these sorts of changes were >>>> not >>>>>> going >>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release. Someone else will have to deal >>> with >>>>>>> resolving >>>>>>>>>> these >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don’t want to stop my other work to figure >>>> them >>>>>> out. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Alex >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/30/18, 9:08 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" < >>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Great! Thanks Alex! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> czw., 30 sie 2018 o 18:05 Alex Harui >>>>>>>>>>>> <aha...@adobe.com.invalid >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a): >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will fix the Maven build in >>>> feature/MXRoyale >>>>>> then >>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>> can >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pull >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> those >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changes into the integration branch. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Alex >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/30/18, 7:42 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Carlos, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nope. I build repo only using ANT. Do >>>> you know >>>>>> how >>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>> fix >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Probably I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> missed some conflicts, not sure why >>> Maven >>>>>>>> complaining. >>>>>>>>>> :) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> won't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time I will look into that tomorrow. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Piotr >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> czw., 30 sie 2018 o 16:24 Carlos >>> Rovira < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> carlosrov...@apache.org >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a): >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Piotr, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I switched to the >>>>>> feature/Merge_MXRoyale_To_Develop >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then try to pass maven and fails just at >>>> the >>>>>>> begining >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I saw that has 2 rat check fails, so I >>>> fixed it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but now I'm seeing more problems >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>> /Users/carlosrovira/Dev/Royale/Source/royale-asjs/frameworks/projects/Core/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/html/supportClasses/DataGroup.as(39): >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> col: 18 Error: interface method >>>> numItemRenderers >>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> interface >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IItemRendererParent not implemented by >>>> class >>>>>>> DataGroup >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> public class DataGroup extends >>>>>>> ContainerContentArea >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> implements >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IItemRendererParent >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ^ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>> /Users/carlosrovira/Dev/Royale/Source/royale-asjs/frameworks/projects/Core/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/html/supportClasses/DataGroup.as(39): >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> col: 18 interface method numItemRenderers >>>> in >>>>>>> interface >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IItemRendererParent >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not implemented by class DataGroup >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> public class DataGroup extends >>>>>>> ContainerContentArea >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> implements >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IItemRendererParent >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ^ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.666093134 seconds >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [*INFO*] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>> *------------------------------------------------------------------------* >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [*INFO*] *Reactor Summary:* >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [*INFO*] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Parent >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0.9.3-SNAPSHOT >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *SUCCESS* [ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.164 s] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ........................... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *SUCCESS* [ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0.273 s] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Fonts >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .................... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *SUCCESS* [ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.175 s] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Libs >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ..................... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *SUCCESS* [ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0.691 s] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Libs: >>>> Core >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ............... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *FAILURE* [ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.947 s] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Libs: >>>> Binding >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ............ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *SKIPPED* >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So I'm a bit confused. I thought the >>>> branch was >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> compiling >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tested >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some point, but it seems that conflicts >>>> are still >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unsolved. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For example in this error, seems MXRoyale >>>>>> introduced >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MX >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> API >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not in Royale core classes until now, so >>> it >>>>>> needs to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> add >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For now >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> only reports this fails, but maybe when >>> it >>>> reach >>>>>>> Basic >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> library >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> could be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much more than that...so my question is, >>>> did you >>>>>> try >>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> compile with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> maven >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the branch? if so did you find this >>>> problems? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Or maybe I'm missing something? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Let me know in order to know how to >>>> operate. I'll >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> return >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jewel >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> duties >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the meanwhile >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Carlos >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> El jue., 30 ago. 2018 a las 16:04, Carlos >>>> Rovira >>>>>> (< >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> carlosrov...@apache.org >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> escribió: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Piotr, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of course, I'll try all Jewel examples >>> and >>>>>> report >>>>>>> if >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> find >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> isuue. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> El jue., 30 ago. 2018 a las 15:33, Piotr >>>>>> Zarzycki >>>>>>> (< >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Alina, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm working on preparation to release >>>> next >>>>>> version >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Royale. One >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> steps were to merge everything what is >>> in >>>>>> MXRoyale >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> develop. I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just finished it and everything what >>> was >>>> in >>>>>>> MXRoyale >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> develop >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> now is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> being merged to special branch >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feature/Merge_MXRoyale_To_Develop. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Before I merge all that stuff back to >>>> develop I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> like >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to ask >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> switch to that branch and test on your >>>> end - >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> whether I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> didn't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> break any >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your stuff. Is something is being >>> missed >>>> - >>>>>> please >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> make >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changes and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> commit >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to that branch. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Carlos, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you switch to that branch as well >>>> and test >>>>>>> some >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jewel >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> examples ? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will try to build Tour De Flex >>>> tomorrow to >>>>>> see >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> happen. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Piotr >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wt., 28 sie 2018 o 19:18 Carlos Rovira >>> < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> carlosrov...@apache.org> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a): >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Piotr, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the recommended way is to create a >>>> integration >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> moreover >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> since >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MXRoyale has gone many time in its own >>>> way. >>>>>> Then >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> solve >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conflicts in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch until you see is stable and all >>>> is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> compiling >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> working >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fine >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expected, then merge into develop the >>>>>> integration >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Good luck! :) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Carlos >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> El mar., 28 ago. 2018 a las 19:00, >>> Alex >>>> Harui >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (<aha...@adobe.com.invalid >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> escribió: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Master and agent have their own root >>>> folders >>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> projects. I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Agent >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is running in c:\Jenkins\workspace >>> and >>>> master >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> may >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> running >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wherever >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> APPDATA is pointing. In theory, >>>>>> royale-compiler >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> royale-typedefs >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should be able to be built off >>>> master, and >>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> builds >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> able >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to use Ant variables to point to the >>>> results >>>>>> of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> those >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> builds. If >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> want >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to try switching everything off >>> master >>>> to the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agent >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fine as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> well. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For me, there were some builds that >>>> would not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> run >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> master. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> HTH, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Alex >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/28/18, 9:50 AM, "Piotr >>> Zarzycki" < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I see failing >>> mustellaresultsparser >>>> [1] >>>>>> [2] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pointing for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reason >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to c:/jenkins/workspace instead >>>> those one >>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Program >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Files. How >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> path >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is appear there ? What actually is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ${env.APPDATA} ? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *[1] ** >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>> >
