Dany, Thanks. I'm personally fine if it is common to use apache-royale tag. Anyone is not in favor of that ?
Piotr pon., 29 kwi 2019 o 18:38 Dany Dhondt <archeme...@mac.com.invalid> napisał(a): > Piotr, > > If you do a search on apache, here are some of the tags: > > apache-camel > apache-flink > apache-spark > apache-storm > … > > A few other examples: > > react-native > create-react-app > … > > Is you browse the tags on SO, you’ll see it’s very common. > > Also, npm naming conventions are all dash separated, or hyphen separated. > > I think we should follow this naming convention. > > Dany > > > > > Op 29 apr. 2019, om 18:14 heeft Piotr Zarzycki < > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> het volgende geschreven: > > > > Dany, > > > > Is it a common way on stack overflow ? It looks too me to complicated, > have > > something additional between two word. > > > > Thanks, > > Piotr > > > > pon., 29 kwi 2019 o 18:01 Dany Dhondt <archeme...@mac.com.invalid> > > napisał(a): > > > >> Shouldn’t it be better to name it apache-royale? > >> That’s the way most tags are build I think > >> > >> Dany > >> > >> > >>> Op 29 apr. 2019, om 17:58 heeft Piotr Zarzycki < > >> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> het volgende geschreven: > >>> > >>> Hi Dany, > >>> > >>> We have agreed on "apacheroyale" tag in different thread. I think you > >> could > >>> use that. > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Piotr > >>> > >>> pon., 29 kwi 2019 o 17:56 Dany Dhondt <archeme...@mac.com.invalid> > >>> napisał(a): > >>> > >>>> Can somebody create some royale tags please? I don’t have enough rep. > >>>> points at this moment. > >>>> Also, shouldn’t we agree on some basic royale tags? > >>>> When the tags are made, I’ll start posting some questions. > >>>> > >>>> Dany > >>>> > >>>>> Op 29 apr. 2019, om 17:27 heeft Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID > > > >>>> het volgende geschreven: > >>>>> > >>>>> I agree we want to develop a presence on Stack Overflow. I still > can't > >>>> figure out how to earn enough points be able to answer any questions > so > >> I > >>>> won't be of much help until that happens. > >>>>> > >>>>> -Alex > >>>>> > >>>>> On 4/29/19, 7:32 AM, "Carlos Rovira" <carlosrov...@apache.org> > wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Hi, > >>>>> > >>>>> about StackOverFlow, we already discussed to start creating > questions > >>>> in > >>>>> SOF, but finally nobody does. I think I should not create one and > >>>> respond > >>>>> myself right? it will be very sad to do in that way. So if someone > >>>> start to > >>>>> post questions in SOF, I promise to respond, at least if it's > >>>> something I > >>>>> can know how to respond. It could be things you already know, but we > >>>> must > >>>>> start in some way. > >>>>> > >>>>> SOF is crucial for us, I talked with customers that pointed me that > >>>> Apache > >>>>> Royale is not on SOF, so his devs can easily search problems there. > >>>> And > >>>>> this is the google for developers. If we are not there, Royale will > >>>> never > >>>>> succeed, So if you want Royale to succeed we all should put some > >>>> work, what > >>>>> we can, in SOF. @dany, if you want to start this effort we can > follow > >>>> you. > >>>>> Just let's know in a mail here so we can go to that link and > respond. > >>>> If > >>>>> you start that your work will be follow :) > >>>>> > >>>>> @Andrew, "Flex In a Week" is a very good idea too. I think we can > >>>> work on > >>>>> that, but again, we need some kind of plan. A team to work on that. > >>>> Things > >>>>> like that can't be create by only one man's work. Volunteers? > >>>>> > >>>>> @Om, I not use NPM but will try Royale CLI since we need something > >>>> really > >>>>> fast to compete with React or others, or people will never jump to > >> out > >>>>> wagon. > >>>>> > >>>>> thanks for all the thoughts! :) > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> El lun., 29 abr. 2019 a las 9:17, OmPrakash Muppirala (< > >>>> bigosma...@gmail.com>) > >>>>> escribió: > >>>>> > >>>>>> On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 7:37 PM Dany Dhondt > >> <archeme...@mac.com.invalid > >>>>> > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> I’m all for buikding a knowledge base in Stack Overflow! The > mailing > >>>> list > >>>>>>> should only be used for developing Royale. Questions about using > >> Royale > >>>>>>> should go to SO > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> The competitors of Royale are React, Vue, Angular, ... > >>>>>>> Lots of developers are now used to those workflows. > >>>>>>> In case of React, create-react-app sets you up with a brand new, > >> ready > >>>> to > >>>>>>> go project in less than 30 seconds. That should be a benchmark for > >>>> Royale > >>>>>>> imo. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Dany > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> The Royale CLI is modeled closely after the create-react-app. The > >> docs > >>>> for > >>>>>> the alpha version is available here: > >>>>>> > >>>> > >> > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Ftree%2Fdevelop%2Fnpm%2Fcli&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C950f12a2b0f24cad192508d6ccaf8241%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636921451512477017&sdata=4VN8JejglMeW08ZcNV6fCJ%2BdYJjOHcvfGDL099jives%3D&reserved=0 > >>>>>> If I get more feedback, I am keep improving this tool. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>> Om > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPhone > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Op 26 apr. 2019 om 12:42 heeft Frost, Andrew < > >> andrew.fr...@harman.com > >>>>> > >>>>>>> het volgende geschreven: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> One other thought ... currently the way people ask for support is > >> via > >>>>>>> these mailing lists. Which are okay but I'm always conscious that > I'm > >>>>>>> potentially spamming people, plus the volume of mails is such that > I > >>>>>> have a > >>>>>>> rule to push all these into a folder that I then review every day > or > >>>>>> two.. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> But if I want to find something out, I tend not to go search the > >>>>>> mailing > >>>>>>> list, I tend to search online. Looking through mailing list threads > >>>> isn't > >>>>>>> the easiest (and search engines don't necessarily pick things up > from > >>>>>> them > >>>>>>> very well) but a major source of support is Stack Overflow... I use > >>>> this > >>>>>> a > >>>>>>> lot with my other work and there's a lot of information there. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Apache Royale doesn't appear to have a tag; when I search for > >> "royale" > >>>>>>> all I got was stuff about "Clash Royale"; there are however 8 > >> questions > >>>>>>> with "flexjs" tags. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> But wouldn't it be good for people to add questions and to > >> contribute > >>>>>>> answers there, both from the user perspective and perhaps also the > >> dev > >>>>>>> perspective? Would be interested in people's thoughts... (and > perhaps > >>>>>> I'll > >>>>>>> have to dig out my SO credentials to start contributing there....) > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> thanks > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Andrew > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>>>>>> From: Carlos Rovira [mailto:carlosrov...@apache.org] > >>>>>>>> Sent: 26 April 2019 10:39 > >>>>>>>> To: dev@royale.apache.org > >>>>>>>> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Let's bump Royale version to 1.0 > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Hi Angelo, that's great! :) > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> any help here is very appreciated. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Share in a new mail a concrete contribution before starting to > work > >> on > >>>>>>> it, so we can know about it and help you on the task so your work > fit > >>>>>>> perfectly in the overall picture. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> I'd like to create videos too, and people asked about it in > facebook > >>>>>> and > >>>>>>> twitter. Do you have skills in creating videos? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> El vie., 26 abr. 2019 a las 10:47, Angelo Lazzari (< > >>>>>>> lazzari.ang...@gmail.com>) > >>>>>>>> escribió: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Yes, i can give some slots to help with documentation or example > >>>>>>>>> project or so... I think tutorial videos could be help to > >> understand > >>>>>>>>> rapidly the platform and could help new user to get ready in a > few > >>>>>>>>> hours to start build their project. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Angelo > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 10:42 AM Carlos Rovira > >>>>>>>>> <carlosrov...@apache.org> > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Agree with latest comments. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> I think we should work in docs and ease the start of new users > to > >>>>>>>>>> target > >>>>>>>>>> 1.0 > >>>>>>>>>> And in the process fix some few things (i.e: don't want to reach > >> 1.0 > >>>>>>>>>> with Jewel Table in its current state and API) > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> What do you think? > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> If you all agree could you think on how to contribute to that > >>>>>>>>>> effort? Can we have as a near goal to bring 1.0 planing > ourselves > >> to > >>>>>>>>>> donate some > >>>>>>>>> hours > >>>>>>>>>> to Apache Royale to make this happen? If some of us help in the > >>>>>>>>>> current state I think we can get to it sooner. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Thanks > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> El vie., 26 abr. 2019 a las 9:57, Angelo Lazzari (< > >>>>>>>>>> lazzari.ang...@gmail.com>) > >>>>>>>>>> escribió: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> I am completely agree with Olaf: start using a new platform > where > >>>>>>>>>>> the documentation is not complete, clean and updated it is a > >>>>>>>>>>> really bad thing...and it would be a potential reason to > increase > >>>>>>>>>>> the difficulty > >>>>>>>>> to > >>>>>>>>>>> adopt the platform... > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Angelo > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> El vie., 26 abr. 2019 8:54, Olaf Krueger <m...@olafkrueger.net > > > >>>>>>>>>> escribió: > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Basically, I think it's important to provide a great developer > >>>>>>>>>>> experience. > >>>>>>>>>>>> IMO, that's more important than trying to implement missing > >>>>>> features. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> One thing to achieve this is documentation of course. > >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks to all of you there already exist a lot of docs, but it > >>>>>>>>>>>> feels > >>>>>>>>> a > >>>>>>>>>>> bit > >>>>>>>>>>>> messy because they are hosted at different places, e.g.: > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> - royale-docs repo > >>>>>>>>>>>> - royale-asjs wiki > >>>>>>>>>>>> - royale-asjs Readme > >>>>>>>>>>>> - > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> > >> > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fclicktime.symantec.com%2F3SEvxFs2HbjNAgsLBEtNLr17Vc%3Fu%3Dhttp&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C950f12a2b0f24cad192508d6ccaf8241%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636921451512477017&sdata=XvGTE3ep7PGJtBuzlJqJmRtzxFLiW3GmkV1eh%2F86%2BY0%3D&reserved=0 > >>>>>>>>>>>> s%3A%2F%2Froyale.apache.org > >>>>>>>>>>>> - ...? > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> As a user, it's hard to get an overview of what is > available... > >>>>>>>>>>>> and > >>>>>>>>>>> where. > >>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe it's a good idea to consolidate the docs before > releasing > >>>>>> 1.0. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Just my 2 cents, > >>>>>>>>>>>> Olaf > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>>>> Sent from: > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> > >> > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fclicktime.symantec.com%2F3LM5ngUtumonkv3VTyrZRJ77Vc%3Fu%3Dhttp&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C950f12a2b0f24cad192508d6ccaf8241%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636921451512487013&sdata=yxwkdwmp0ecdXr4O1Dv2OKH03yDDunVMLIauChDKoo4%3D&reserved=0 > >>>>>>>>>>>> %3A%2F%2Fapache-royale-development.20373.n8.nabble.com%2F > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>> Carlos Rovira > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>> > >> > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fclicktime.symantec.com%2F38jVp7aJ4ouZou8k1qd97Hn7Vc%3Fu%3Dhttp%253A%25&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C950f12a2b0f24cad192508d6ccaf8241%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636921451512487013&sdata=8yjFFtRFlwh79EDsxRWNwNBP%2BeK3D%2BQiBlscondNn%2FM%3D&reserved=0 > >>>>>>>>>> 2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>> Angelo Lazzari > >>>>>>>>> mobile: +34 683 137 087 > >>>>>>>>> mail: lazzari.ang...@gmail.com > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>>>>>> -------------------------------------------------- > >>>>>>>>> Verify the correspondence of the addressee; otherwise, notify > that > >> to > >>>>>>>>> the sender and, conscious of the responsibility for the undue > use, > >>>>>>>>> destroy the message and its copies. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>>>>>> -------------------------------------------------- > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>> Carlos Rovira > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>> > >> > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fclicktime.symantec.com%2F38jVp7aJ4ouZou8k1qd97Hn7Vc%3Fu%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fabout.me%252Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C950f12a2b0f24cad192508d6ccaf8241%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636921451512487013&sdata=EJE8iBmKz3wl8nUyLoeMlxg%2ByDKKSbSGkv%2FaI1KudZU%3D&reserved=0 > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> Carlos Rovira > >>>>> > >>>> > >> > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C950f12a2b0f24cad192508d6ccaf8241%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636921451512487013&sdata=HqD%2BhpX%2BM36WaF0edrKO5MlYZnIZCuVibKBN3pLx%2FKg%3D&reserved=0 > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> > >>> Piotr Zarzycki > >>> > >>> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki > >>> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>* > >> > >> > > > > -- > > > > Piotr Zarzycki > > > > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki > > <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>* > > -- Piotr Zarzycki Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
