I agree we want to develop a presence on Stack Overflow. I still can't figure
out how to earn enough points be able to answer any questions so I won't be of
much help until that happens.
-Alex
On 4/29/19, 7:32 AM, "Carlos Rovira" <carlosrov...@apache.org> wrote:
Hi,
about StackOverFlow, we already discussed to start creating questions in
SOF, but finally nobody does. I think I should not create one and respond
myself right? it will be very sad to do in that way. So if someone start to
post questions in SOF, I promise to respond, at least if it's something I
can know how to respond. It could be things you already know, but we must
start in some way.
SOF is crucial for us, I talked with customers that pointed me that Apache
Royale is not on SOF, so his devs can easily search problems there. And
this is the google for developers. If we are not there, Royale will never
succeed, So if you want Royale to succeed we all should put some work, what
we can, in SOF. @dany, if you want to start this effort we can follow you.
Just let's know in a mail here so we can go to that link and respond. If
you start that your work will be follow :)
@Andrew, "Flex In a Week" is a very good idea too. I think we can work on
that, but again, we need some kind of plan. A team to work on that. Things
like that can't be create by only one man's work. Volunteers?
@Om, I not use NPM but will try Royale CLI since we need something really
fast to compete with React or others, or people will never jump to out
wagon.
thanks for all the thoughts! :)
El lun., 29 abr. 2019 a las 9:17, OmPrakash Muppirala
(<bigosma...@gmail.com>)
escribió:
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 7:37 PM Dany Dhondt <archeme...@mac.com.invalid>
> wrote:
>
> > I’m all for buikding a knowledge base in Stack Overflow! The mailing
list
> > should only be used for developing Royale. Questions about using Royale
> > should go to SO
> >
> > The competitors of Royale are React, Vue, Angular, ...
> > Lots of developers are now used to those workflows.
> > In case of React, create-react-app sets you up with a brand new, ready
to
> > go project in less than 30 seconds. That should be a benchmark for
Royale
> > imo.
> >
> > Dany
> >
> >
> The Royale CLI is modeled closely after the create-react-app. The docs
for
> the alpha version is available here:
>
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Ftree%2Fdevelop%2Fnpm%2Fcli&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C950f12a2b0f24cad192508d6ccaf8241%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636921451512477017&sdata=4VN8JejglMeW08ZcNV6fCJ%2BdYJjOHcvfGDL099jives%3D&reserved=0
> If I get more feedback, I am keep improving this tool.
>
> Thanks,
> Om
>
>
>
> > Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPhone
> >
> > > Op 26 apr. 2019 om 12:42 heeft Frost, Andrew <andrew.fr...@harman.com>
> > het volgende geschreven:
> > >
> > > One other thought ... currently the way people ask for support is via
> > these mailing lists. Which are okay but I'm always conscious that I'm
> > potentially spamming people, plus the volume of mails is such that I
> have a
> > rule to push all these into a folder that I then review every day or
> two..
> > >
> > > But if I want to find something out, I tend not to go search the
> mailing
> > list, I tend to search online. Looking through mailing list threads
isn't
> > the easiest (and search engines don't necessarily pick things up from
> them
> > very well) but a major source of support is Stack Overflow... I use this
> a
> > lot with my other work and there's a lot of information there.
> > >
> > > Apache Royale doesn't appear to have a tag; when I search for "royale"
> > all I got was stuff about "Clash Royale"; there are however 8 questions
> > with "flexjs" tags.
> > >
> > > But wouldn't it be good for people to add questions and to contribute
> > answers there, both from the user perspective and perhaps also the dev
> > perspective? Would be interested in people's thoughts... (and perhaps
> I'll
> > have to dig out my SO credentials to start contributing there....)
> > >
> > > thanks
> > >
> > > Andrew
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Carlos Rovira [mailto:carlosrov...@apache.org]
> > > Sent: 26 April 2019 10:39
> > > To: dev@royale.apache.org
> > > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Let's bump Royale version to 1.0
> > >
> > > Hi Angelo, that's great! :)
> > >
> > > any help here is very appreciated.
> > >
> > > Share in a new mail a concrete contribution before starting to work on
> > it, so we can know about it and help you on the task so your work fit
> > perfectly in the overall picture.
> > >
> > > I'd like to create videos too, and people asked about it in facebook
> and
> > twitter. Do you have skills in creating videos?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > El vie., 26 abr. 2019 a las 10:47, Angelo Lazzari (<
> > lazzari.ang...@gmail.com>)
> > > escribió:
> > >
> > >> Yes, i can give some slots to help with documentation or example
> > >> project or so... I think tutorial videos could be help to understand
> > >> rapidly the platform and could help new user to get ready in a few
> > >> hours to start build their project.
> > >>
> > >> Angelo
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 10:42 AM Carlos Rovira
> > >> <carlosrov...@apache.org>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Agree with latest comments.
> > >>>
> > >>> I think we should work in docs and ease the start of new users to
> > >>> target
> > >>> 1.0
> > >>> And in the process fix some few things (i.e: don't want to reach 1.0
> > >>> with Jewel Table in its current state and API)
> > >>>
> > >>> What do you think?
> > >>>
> > >>> If you all agree could you think on how to contribute to that
> > >>> effort? Can we have as a near goal to bring 1.0 planing ourselves to
> > >>> donate some
> > >> hours
> > >>> to Apache Royale to make this happen? If some of us help in the
> > >>> current state I think we can get to it sooner.
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> El vie., 26 abr. 2019 a las 9:57, Angelo Lazzari (<
> > >>> lazzari.ang...@gmail.com>)
> > >>> escribió:
> > >>>
> > >>>> I am completely agree with Olaf: start using a new platform where
> > >>>> the documentation is not complete, clean and updated it is a
> > >>>> really bad thing...and it would be a potential reason to increase
> > >>>> the difficulty
> > >> to
> > >>>> adopt the platform...
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Angelo
> > >>>>
> > >>>> El vie., 26 abr. 2019 8:54, Olaf Krueger <m...@olafkrueger.net>
> > >>> escribió:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> Hi,
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Basically, I think it's important to provide a great developer
> > >>>> experience.
> > >>>>> IMO, that's more important than trying to implement missing
> features.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> One thing to achieve this is documentation of course.
> > >>>>> Thanks to all of you there already exist a lot of docs, but it
> > >>>>> feels
> > >> a
> > >>>> bit
> > >>>>> messy because they are hosted at different places, e.g.:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> - royale-docs repo
> > >>>>> - royale-asjs wiki
> > >>>>> - royale-asjs Readme
> > >>>>> -
> > >>>>>
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fclicktime.symantec.com%2F3SEvxFs2HbjNAgsLBEtNLr17Vc%3Fu%3Dhttp&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C950f12a2b0f24cad192508d6ccaf8241%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636921451512477017&sdata=XvGTE3ep7PGJtBuzlJqJmRtzxFLiW3GmkV1eh%2F86%2BY0%3D&reserved=0
> > >>>>> s%3A%2F%2Froyale.apache.org
> > >>>>> - ...?
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> As a user, it's hard to get an overview of what is available...
> > >>>>> and
> > >>>> where.
> > >>>>> Maybe it's a good idea to consolidate the docs before releasing
> 1.0.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Just my 2 cents,
> > >>>>> Olaf
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> --
> > >>>>> Sent from:
> > >>>>>
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fclicktime.symantec.com%2F3LM5ngUtumonkv3VTyrZRJ77Vc%3Fu%3Dhttp&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C950f12a2b0f24cad192508d6ccaf8241%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636921451512487013&sdata=yxwkdwmp0ecdXr4O1Dv2OKH03yDDunVMLIauChDKoo4%3D&reserved=0
> > >>>>> %3A%2F%2Fapache-royale-development.20373.n8.nabble.com%2F
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> --
> > >>> Carlos Rovira
> > >>>
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fclicktime.symantec.com%2F38jVp7aJ4ouZou8k1qd97Hn7Vc%3Fu%3Dhttp%253A%25&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C950f12a2b0f24cad192508d6ccaf8241%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636921451512487013&sdata=8yjFFtRFlwh79EDsxRWNwNBP%2BeK3D%2BQiBlscondNn%2FM%3D&reserved=0
> > >>> 2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Angelo Lazzari
> > >> mobile: +34 683 137 087
> > >> mail: lazzari.ang...@gmail.com
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> --------------------------------------------------
> > >> Verify the correspondence of the addressee; otherwise, notify that to
> > >> the sender and, conscious of the responsibility for the undue use,
> > >> destroy the message and its copies.
> > >>
> > >>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> --------------------------------------------------
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Carlos Rovira
> > >
> >
>
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fclicktime.symantec.com%2F38jVp7aJ4ouZou8k1qd97Hn7Vc%3Fu%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fabout.me%252Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C950f12a2b0f24cad192508d6ccaf8241%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636921451512487013&sdata=EJE8iBmKz3wl8nUyLoeMlxg%2ByDKKSbSGkv%2FaI1KudZU%3D&reserved=0
> >
> >
>
--
Carlos Rovira
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C950f12a2b0f24cad192508d6ccaf8241%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636921451512487013&sdata=HqD%2BhpX%2BM36WaF0edrKO5MlYZnIZCuVibKBN3pLx%2FKg%3D&reserved=0
