On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 7:37 PM Dany Dhondt <archeme...@mac.com.invalid> wrote:
> I’m all for buikding a knowledge base in Stack Overflow! The mailing list > should only be used for developing Royale. Questions about using Royale > should go to SO > > The competitors of Royale are React, Vue, Angular, ... > Lots of developers are now used to those workflows. > In case of React, create-react-app sets you up with a brand new, ready to > go project in less than 30 seconds. That should be a benchmark for Royale > imo. > > Dany > > The Royale CLI is modeled closely after the create-react-app. The docs for the alpha version is available here: https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/tree/develop/npm/cli If I get more feedback, I am keep improving this tool. Thanks, Om > Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPhone > > > Op 26 apr. 2019 om 12:42 heeft Frost, Andrew <andrew.fr...@harman.com> > het volgende geschreven: > > > > One other thought ... currently the way people ask for support is via > these mailing lists. Which are okay but I'm always conscious that I'm > potentially spamming people, plus the volume of mails is such that I have a > rule to push all these into a folder that I then review every day or two.. > > > > But if I want to find something out, I tend not to go search the mailing > list, I tend to search online. Looking through mailing list threads isn't > the easiest (and search engines don't necessarily pick things up from them > very well) but a major source of support is Stack Overflow... I use this a > lot with my other work and there's a lot of information there. > > > > Apache Royale doesn't appear to have a tag; when I search for "royale" > all I got was stuff about "Clash Royale"; there are however 8 questions > with "flexjs" tags. > > > > But wouldn't it be good for people to add questions and to contribute > answers there, both from the user perspective and perhaps also the dev > perspective? Would be interested in people's thoughts... (and perhaps I'll > have to dig out my SO credentials to start contributing there....) > > > > thanks > > > > Andrew > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Carlos Rovira [mailto:carlosrov...@apache.org] > > Sent: 26 April 2019 10:39 > > To: dev@royale.apache.org > > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Let's bump Royale version to 1.0 > > > > Hi Angelo, that's great! :) > > > > any help here is very appreciated. > > > > Share in a new mail a concrete contribution before starting to work on > it, so we can know about it and help you on the task so your work fit > perfectly in the overall picture. > > > > I'd like to create videos too, and people asked about it in facebook and > twitter. Do you have skills in creating videos? > > > > > > > > El vie., 26 abr. 2019 a las 10:47, Angelo Lazzari (< > lazzari.ang...@gmail.com>) > > escribió: > > > >> Yes, i can give some slots to help with documentation or example > >> project or so... I think tutorial videos could be help to understand > >> rapidly the platform and could help new user to get ready in a few > >> hours to start build their project. > >> > >> Angelo > >> > >> On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 10:42 AM Carlos Rovira > >> <carlosrov...@apache.org> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Agree with latest comments. > >>> > >>> I think we should work in docs and ease the start of new users to > >>> target > >>> 1.0 > >>> And in the process fix some few things (i.e: don't want to reach 1.0 > >>> with Jewel Table in its current state and API) > >>> > >>> What do you think? > >>> > >>> If you all agree could you think on how to contribute to that > >>> effort? Can we have as a near goal to bring 1.0 planing ourselves to > >>> donate some > >> hours > >>> to Apache Royale to make this happen? If some of us help in the > >>> current state I think we can get to it sooner. > >>> > >>> Thanks > >>> > >>> > >>> El vie., 26 abr. 2019 a las 9:57, Angelo Lazzari (< > >>> lazzari.ang...@gmail.com>) > >>> escribió: > >>> > >>>> I am completely agree with Olaf: start using a new platform where > >>>> the documentation is not complete, clean and updated it is a > >>>> really bad thing...and it would be a potential reason to increase > >>>> the difficulty > >> to > >>>> adopt the platform... > >>>> > >>>> Angelo > >>>> > >>>> El vie., 26 abr. 2019 8:54, Olaf Krueger <m...@olafkrueger.net> > >>> escribió: > >>>> > >>>>> Hi, > >>>>> > >>>>> Basically, I think it's important to provide a great developer > >>>> experience. > >>>>> IMO, that's more important than trying to implement missing features. > >>>>> > >>>>> One thing to achieve this is documentation of course. > >>>>> Thanks to all of you there already exist a lot of docs, but it > >>>>> feels > >> a > >>>> bit > >>>>> messy because they are hosted at different places, e.g.: > >>>>> > >>>>> - royale-docs repo > >>>>> - royale-asjs wiki > >>>>> - royale-asjs Readme > >>>>> - > >>>>> https://clicktime.symantec.com/3SEvxFs2HbjNAgsLBEtNLr17Vc?u=http > >>>>> s%3A%2F%2Froyale.apache.org > >>>>> - ...? > >>>>> > >>>>> As a user, it's hard to get an overview of what is available... > >>>>> and > >>>> where. > >>>>> Maybe it's a good idea to consolidate the docs before releasing 1.0. > >>>>> > >>>>> Just my 2 cents, > >>>>> Olaf > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> Sent from: > >>>>> https://clicktime.symantec.com/3LM5ngUtumonkv3VTyrZRJ77Vc?u=http > >>>>> %3A%2F%2Fapache-royale-development.20373.n8.nabble.com%2F > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Carlos Rovira > >>> https://clicktime.symantec.com/38jVp7aJ4ouZou8k1qd97Hn7Vc?u=http%3A% > >>> 2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira > >>> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Angelo Lazzari > >> mobile: +34 683 137 087 > >> mail: lazzari.ang...@gmail.com > >> > >> > >> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> -------------------------------------------------- > >> Verify the correspondence of the addressee; otherwise, notify that to > >> the sender and, conscious of the responsibility for the undue use, > >> destroy the message and its copies. > >> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> -------------------------------------------------- > >> > > > > > > -- > > Carlos Rovira > > > https://clicktime.symantec.com/38jVp7aJ4ouZou8k1qd97Hn7Vc?u=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira > >
