Shouldn’t it be better to name it apache-royale?
That’s the way most tags are build I think

Dany


> Op 29 apr. 2019, om 17:58 heeft Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> 
> het volgende geschreven:
> 
> Hi Dany,
> 
> We have agreed on "apacheroyale" tag in different thread. I think you could
> use that.
> 
> Thanks,
> Piotr
> 
> pon., 29 kwi 2019 o 17:56 Dany Dhondt <archeme...@mac.com.invalid>
> napisał(a):
> 
>> Can somebody create some royale tags please? I don’t have enough rep.
>> points at this moment.
>> Also, shouldn’t we agree on some basic royale tags?
>> When the tags are made, I’ll start posting some questions.
>> 
>> Dany
>> 
>>> Op 29 apr. 2019, om 17:27 heeft Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID>
>> het volgende geschreven:
>>> 
>>> I agree we want to develop a presence on Stack Overflow.  I still can't
>> figure out how to earn enough points be able to answer any questions so I
>> won't be of much help until that happens.
>>> 
>>> -Alex
>>> 
>>> On 4/29/19, 7:32 AM, "Carlos Rovira" <carlosrov...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>>   Hi,
>>> 
>>>   about StackOverFlow, we already discussed to start creating questions
>> in
>>>   SOF, but finally nobody does. I think I should not create one and
>> respond
>>>   myself right? it will be very sad to do in that way. So if someone
>> start to
>>>   post questions in SOF, I promise to respond, at least if it's
>> something I
>>>   can know how to respond. It could be things you already know, but we
>> must
>>>   start in some way.
>>> 
>>>   SOF is crucial for us, I talked with customers that pointed me that
>> Apache
>>>   Royale is not on SOF, so his devs can easily search problems there.
>> And
>>>   this is the google for developers. If we are not there, Royale will
>> never
>>>   succeed, So if you want Royale to succeed we all should put some
>> work, what
>>>   we can, in SOF. @dany, if you want to start this effort we can follow
>> you.
>>>   Just let's know in a mail here so we can go to that link and respond.
>> If
>>>   you start that your work will be follow :)
>>> 
>>>   @Andrew, "Flex In a Week" is a very good idea too. I think we can
>> work on
>>>   that, but again, we need some kind of plan. A team to work on that.
>> Things
>>>   like that can't be create by only one man's work. Volunteers?
>>> 
>>>   @Om, I not use NPM but will try Royale CLI since we need something
>> really
>>>   fast to compete with React or others, or people will never jump to out
>>>   wagon.
>>> 
>>>   thanks for all the thoughts! :)
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>   El lun., 29 abr. 2019 a las 9:17, OmPrakash Muppirala (<
>> bigosma...@gmail.com>)
>>>   escribió:
>>> 
>>>> On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 7:37 PM Dany Dhondt <archeme...@mac.com.invalid
>>> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> I’m all for buikding a knowledge base in Stack Overflow! The mailing
>> list
>>>>> should only be used for developing Royale. Questions about using Royale
>>>>> should go to SO
>>>>> 
>>>>> The competitors of Royale are React, Vue, Angular, ...
>>>>> Lots of developers are now used to those workflows.
>>>>> In case of React, create-react-app sets you up with a brand new, ready
>> to
>>>>> go project in less than 30 seconds. That should be a benchmark for
>> Royale
>>>>> imo.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Dany
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> The Royale CLI is modeled closely after the create-react-app.  The docs
>> for
>>>> the alpha version is available here:
>>>> 
>> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Ftree%2Fdevelop%2Fnpm%2Fcli&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C950f12a2b0f24cad192508d6ccaf8241%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636921451512477017&amp;sdata=4VN8JejglMeW08ZcNV6fCJ%2BdYJjOHcvfGDL099jives%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>>> If I get more feedback, I am keep improving this tool.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Om
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPhone
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Op 26 apr. 2019 om 12:42 heeft Frost, Andrew <andrew.fr...@harman.com
>>> 
>>>>> het volgende geschreven:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> One other thought ... currently the way people ask for support is via
>>>>> these mailing lists. Which are okay but I'm always conscious that I'm
>>>>> potentially spamming people, plus the volume of mails is such that I
>>>> have a
>>>>> rule to push all these into a folder that I then review every day or
>>>> two..
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> But if I want to find something out, I tend not to go search the
>>>> mailing
>>>>> list, I tend to search online. Looking through mailing list threads
>> isn't
>>>>> the easiest (and search engines don't necessarily pick things up from
>>>> them
>>>>> very well) but a major source of support is Stack Overflow... I use
>> this
>>>> a
>>>>> lot with my other work and there's a lot of information there.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Apache Royale doesn't appear to have a tag; when I search for "royale"
>>>>> all I got was stuff about "Clash Royale"; there are however 8 questions
>>>>> with "flexjs" tags.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> But wouldn't it be good for people to add questions and to contribute
>>>>> answers there, both from the user perspective and perhaps also the dev
>>>>> perspective? Would be interested in people's thoughts... (and perhaps
>>>> I'll
>>>>> have to dig out my SO credentials to start contributing there....)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> thanks
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Andrew
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> From: Carlos Rovira [mailto:carlosrov...@apache.org]
>>>>>> Sent: 26 April 2019 10:39
>>>>>> To: dev@royale.apache.org
>>>>>> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Let's bump Royale version to 1.0
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hi Angelo, that's great! :)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> any help here is very appreciated.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Share in a new mail a concrete contribution before starting to work on
>>>>> it, so we can know about it and help you on the task so your work fit
>>>>> perfectly in the overall picture.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I'd like to create videos too, and people asked about it in facebook
>>>> and
>>>>> twitter. Do you have skills in creating videos?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> El vie., 26 abr. 2019 a las 10:47, Angelo Lazzari (<
>>>>> lazzari.ang...@gmail.com>)
>>>>>> escribió:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Yes, i can give some slots to help with documentation or example
>>>>>>> project or so... I think tutorial videos could be help to understand
>>>>>>> rapidly the platform and could help new user to get ready in a few
>>>>>>> hours to start build their project.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Angelo
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 10:42 AM Carlos Rovira
>>>>>>> <carlosrov...@apache.org>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Agree with latest comments.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I think we should work in docs and ease the start of new users to
>>>>>>>> target
>>>>>>>> 1.0
>>>>>>>> And in the process fix some few things (i.e: don't want to reach 1.0
>>>>>>>> with Jewel Table in its current state and API)
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> What do you think?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> If you all agree could you think on how to contribute to that
>>>>>>>> effort? Can we have as a near goal to bring 1.0 planing ourselves to
>>>>>>>> donate some
>>>>>>> hours
>>>>>>>> to Apache Royale to make this happen? If some of us help in the
>>>>>>>> current state I think we can get to it sooner.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> El vie., 26 abr. 2019 a las 9:57, Angelo Lazzari (<
>>>>>>>> lazzari.ang...@gmail.com>)
>>>>>>>> escribió:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> I am completely agree with Olaf: start using a new platform where
>>>>>>>>> the documentation is not complete, clean and updated it is a
>>>>>>>>> really bad thing...and it would be a potential reason to increase
>>>>>>>>> the difficulty
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>> adopt the platform...
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Angelo
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> El vie., 26 abr. 2019 8:54, Olaf Krueger <m...@olafkrueger.net>
>>>>>>>> escribió:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Basically, I think it's important to provide a great developer
>>>>>>>>> experience.
>>>>>>>>>> IMO, that's more important than trying to implement missing
>>>> features.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> One thing to achieve this is documentation of course.
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks to all of you there already exist a lot of docs, but it
>>>>>>>>>> feels
>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>> bit
>>>>>>>>>> messy because they are hosted at different places, e.g.:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> - royale-docs repo
>>>>>>>>>> - royale-asjs wiki
>>>>>>>>>> - royale-asjs Readme
>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>> 
>> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fclicktime.symantec.com%2F3SEvxFs2HbjNAgsLBEtNLr17Vc%3Fu%3Dhttp&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C950f12a2b0f24cad192508d6ccaf8241%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636921451512477017&amp;sdata=XvGTE3ep7PGJtBuzlJqJmRtzxFLiW3GmkV1eh%2F86%2BY0%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>>>>>>>>> s%3A%2F%2Froyale.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>> - ...?
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> As a user, it's hard to get an overview of what is available...
>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>> where.
>>>>>>>>>> Maybe it's a good idea to consolidate the docs before releasing
>>>> 1.0.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Just my 2 cents,
>>>>>>>>>> Olaf
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Sent from:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fclicktime.symantec.com%2F3LM5ngUtumonkv3VTyrZRJ77Vc%3Fu%3Dhttp&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C950f12a2b0f24cad192508d6ccaf8241%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636921451512487013&amp;sdata=yxwkdwmp0ecdXr4O1Dv2OKH03yDDunVMLIauChDKoo4%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>>>>>>>>> %3A%2F%2Fapache-royale-development.20373.n8.nabble.com%2F
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Carlos Rovira
>>>>>>>> 
>> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fclicktime.symantec.com%2F38jVp7aJ4ouZou8k1qd97Hn7Vc%3Fu%3Dhttp%253A%25&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C950f12a2b0f24cad192508d6ccaf8241%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636921451512487013&amp;sdata=8yjFFtRFlwh79EDsxRWNwNBP%2BeK3D%2BQiBlscondNn%2FM%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>>>>>>> 2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Angelo Lazzari
>>>>>>> mobile: +34 683 137 087
>>>>>>> mail: lazzari.ang...@gmail.com
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> Verify the correspondence of the addressee; otherwise, notify that to
>>>>>>> the sender and, conscious of the responsibility for the undue use,
>>>>>>> destroy the message and its copies.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Carlos Rovira
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fclicktime.symantec.com%2F38jVp7aJ4ouZou8k1qd97Hn7Vc%3Fu%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fabout.me%252Fcarlosrovira&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C950f12a2b0f24cad192508d6ccaf8241%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636921451512487013&amp;sdata=EJE8iBmKz3wl8nUyLoeMlxg%2ByDKKSbSGkv%2FaI1KudZU%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>   --
>>>   Carlos Rovira
>>> 
>> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C950f12a2b0f24cad192508d6ccaf8241%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636921451512487013&amp;sdata=HqD%2BhpX%2BM36WaF0edrKO5MlYZnIZCuVibKBN3pLx%2FKg%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> Piotr Zarzycki
> 
> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*

Reply via email to