Dany, Is it a common way on stack overflow ? It looks too me to complicated, have something additional between two word.
Thanks, Piotr pon., 29 kwi 2019 o 18:01 Dany Dhondt <archeme...@mac.com.invalid> napisał(a): > Shouldn’t it be better to name it apache-royale? > That’s the way most tags are build I think > > Dany > > > > Op 29 apr. 2019, om 17:58 heeft Piotr Zarzycki < > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> het volgende geschreven: > > > > Hi Dany, > > > > We have agreed on "apacheroyale" tag in different thread. I think you > could > > use that. > > > > Thanks, > > Piotr > > > > pon., 29 kwi 2019 o 17:56 Dany Dhondt <archeme...@mac.com.invalid> > > napisał(a): > > > >> Can somebody create some royale tags please? I don’t have enough rep. > >> points at this moment. > >> Also, shouldn’t we agree on some basic royale tags? > >> When the tags are made, I’ll start posting some questions. > >> > >> Dany > >> > >>> Op 29 apr. 2019, om 17:27 heeft Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> > >> het volgende geschreven: > >>> > >>> I agree we want to develop a presence on Stack Overflow. I still can't > >> figure out how to earn enough points be able to answer any questions so > I > >> won't be of much help until that happens. > >>> > >>> -Alex > >>> > >>> On 4/29/19, 7:32 AM, "Carlos Rovira" <carlosrov...@apache.org> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> about StackOverFlow, we already discussed to start creating questions > >> in > >>> SOF, but finally nobody does. I think I should not create one and > >> respond > >>> myself right? it will be very sad to do in that way. So if someone > >> start to > >>> post questions in SOF, I promise to respond, at least if it's > >> something I > >>> can know how to respond. It could be things you already know, but we > >> must > >>> start in some way. > >>> > >>> SOF is crucial for us, I talked with customers that pointed me that > >> Apache > >>> Royale is not on SOF, so his devs can easily search problems there. > >> And > >>> this is the google for developers. If we are not there, Royale will > >> never > >>> succeed, So if you want Royale to succeed we all should put some > >> work, what > >>> we can, in SOF. @dany, if you want to start this effort we can follow > >> you. > >>> Just let's know in a mail here so we can go to that link and respond. > >> If > >>> you start that your work will be follow :) > >>> > >>> @Andrew, "Flex In a Week" is a very good idea too. I think we can > >> work on > >>> that, but again, we need some kind of plan. A team to work on that. > >> Things > >>> like that can't be create by only one man's work. Volunteers? > >>> > >>> @Om, I not use NPM but will try Royale CLI since we need something > >> really > >>> fast to compete with React or others, or people will never jump to > out > >>> wagon. > >>> > >>> thanks for all the thoughts! :) > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> El lun., 29 abr. 2019 a las 9:17, OmPrakash Muppirala (< > >> bigosma...@gmail.com>) > >>> escribió: > >>> > >>>> On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 7:37 PM Dany Dhondt > <archeme...@mac.com.invalid > >>> > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> I’m all for buikding a knowledge base in Stack Overflow! The mailing > >> list > >>>>> should only be used for developing Royale. Questions about using > Royale > >>>>> should go to SO > >>>>> > >>>>> The competitors of Royale are React, Vue, Angular, ... > >>>>> Lots of developers are now used to those workflows. > >>>>> In case of React, create-react-app sets you up with a brand new, > ready > >> to > >>>>> go project in less than 30 seconds. That should be a benchmark for > >> Royale > >>>>> imo. > >>>>> > >>>>> Dany > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> The Royale CLI is modeled closely after the create-react-app. The > docs > >> for > >>>> the alpha version is available here: > >>>> > >> > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Ftree%2Fdevelop%2Fnpm%2Fcli&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C950f12a2b0f24cad192508d6ccaf8241%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636921451512477017&sdata=4VN8JejglMeW08ZcNV6fCJ%2BdYJjOHcvfGDL099jives%3D&reserved=0 > >>>> If I get more feedback, I am keep improving this tool. > >>>> > >>>> Thanks, > >>>> Om > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPhone > >>>>> > >>>>>> Op 26 apr. 2019 om 12:42 heeft Frost, Andrew < > andrew.fr...@harman.com > >>> > >>>>> het volgende geschreven: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> One other thought ... currently the way people ask for support is > via > >>>>> these mailing lists. Which are okay but I'm always conscious that I'm > >>>>> potentially spamming people, plus the volume of mails is such that I > >>>> have a > >>>>> rule to push all these into a folder that I then review every day or > >>>> two.. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> But if I want to find something out, I tend not to go search the > >>>> mailing > >>>>> list, I tend to search online. Looking through mailing list threads > >> isn't > >>>>> the easiest (and search engines don't necessarily pick things up from > >>>> them > >>>>> very well) but a major source of support is Stack Overflow... I use > >> this > >>>> a > >>>>> lot with my other work and there's a lot of information there. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Apache Royale doesn't appear to have a tag; when I search for > "royale" > >>>>> all I got was stuff about "Clash Royale"; there are however 8 > questions > >>>>> with "flexjs" tags. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> But wouldn't it be good for people to add questions and to > contribute > >>>>> answers there, both from the user perspective and perhaps also the > dev > >>>>> perspective? Would be interested in people's thoughts... (and perhaps > >>>> I'll > >>>>> have to dig out my SO credentials to start contributing there....) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> thanks > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Andrew > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>>>> From: Carlos Rovira [mailto:carlosrov...@apache.org] > >>>>>> Sent: 26 April 2019 10:39 > >>>>>> To: dev@royale.apache.org > >>>>>> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Let's bump Royale version to 1.0 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Hi Angelo, that's great! :) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> any help here is very appreciated. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Share in a new mail a concrete contribution before starting to work > on > >>>>> it, so we can know about it and help you on the task so your work fit > >>>>> perfectly in the overall picture. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I'd like to create videos too, and people asked about it in facebook > >>>> and > >>>>> twitter. Do you have skills in creating videos? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> El vie., 26 abr. 2019 a las 10:47, Angelo Lazzari (< > >>>>> lazzari.ang...@gmail.com>) > >>>>>> escribió: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Yes, i can give some slots to help with documentation or example > >>>>>>> project or so... I think tutorial videos could be help to > understand > >>>>>>> rapidly the platform and could help new user to get ready in a few > >>>>>>> hours to start build their project. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Angelo > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 10:42 AM Carlos Rovira > >>>>>>> <carlosrov...@apache.org> > >>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Agree with latest comments. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> I think we should work in docs and ease the start of new users to > >>>>>>>> target > >>>>>>>> 1.0 > >>>>>>>> And in the process fix some few things (i.e: don't want to reach > 1.0 > >>>>>>>> with Jewel Table in its current state and API) > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> What do you think? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> If you all agree could you think on how to contribute to that > >>>>>>>> effort? Can we have as a near goal to bring 1.0 planing ourselves > to > >>>>>>>> donate some > >>>>>>> hours > >>>>>>>> to Apache Royale to make this happen? If some of us help in the > >>>>>>>> current state I think we can get to it sooner. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Thanks > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> El vie., 26 abr. 2019 a las 9:57, Angelo Lazzari (< > >>>>>>>> lazzari.ang...@gmail.com>) > >>>>>>>> escribió: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> I am completely agree with Olaf: start using a new platform where > >>>>>>>>> the documentation is not complete, clean and updated it is a > >>>>>>>>> really bad thing...and it would be a potential reason to increase > >>>>>>>>> the difficulty > >>>>>>> to > >>>>>>>>> adopt the platform... > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Angelo > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> El vie., 26 abr. 2019 8:54, Olaf Krueger <m...@olafkrueger.net> > >>>>>>>> escribió: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Hi, > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Basically, I think it's important to provide a great developer > >>>>>>>>> experience. > >>>>>>>>>> IMO, that's more important than trying to implement missing > >>>> features. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> One thing to achieve this is documentation of course. > >>>>>>>>>> Thanks to all of you there already exist a lot of docs, but it > >>>>>>>>>> feels > >>>>>>> a > >>>>>>>>> bit > >>>>>>>>>> messy because they are hosted at different places, e.g.: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> - royale-docs repo > >>>>>>>>>> - royale-asjs wiki > >>>>>>>>>> - royale-asjs Readme > >>>>>>>>>> - > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fclicktime.symantec.com%2F3SEvxFs2HbjNAgsLBEtNLr17Vc%3Fu%3Dhttp&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C950f12a2b0f24cad192508d6ccaf8241%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636921451512477017&sdata=XvGTE3ep7PGJtBuzlJqJmRtzxFLiW3GmkV1eh%2F86%2BY0%3D&reserved=0 > >>>>>>>>>> s%3A%2F%2Froyale.apache.org > >>>>>>>>>> - ...? > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> As a user, it's hard to get an overview of what is available... > >>>>>>>>>> and > >>>>>>>>> where. > >>>>>>>>>> Maybe it's a good idea to consolidate the docs before releasing > >>>> 1.0. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Just my 2 cents, > >>>>>>>>>> Olaf > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>> Sent from: > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fclicktime.symantec.com%2F3LM5ngUtumonkv3VTyrZRJ77Vc%3Fu%3Dhttp&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C950f12a2b0f24cad192508d6ccaf8241%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636921451512487013&sdata=yxwkdwmp0ecdXr4O1Dv2OKH03yDDunVMLIauChDKoo4%3D&reserved=0 > >>>>>>>>>> %3A%2F%2Fapache-royale-development.20373.n8.nabble.com%2F > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>> Carlos Rovira > >>>>>>>> > >> > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fclicktime.symantec.com%2F38jVp7aJ4ouZou8k1qd97Hn7Vc%3Fu%3Dhttp%253A%25&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C950f12a2b0f24cad192508d6ccaf8241%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636921451512487013&sdata=8yjFFtRFlwh79EDsxRWNwNBP%2BeK3D%2BQiBlscondNn%2FM%3D&reserved=0 > >>>>>>>> 2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>> Angelo Lazzari > >>>>>>> mobile: +34 683 137 087 > >>>>>>> mail: lazzari.ang...@gmail.com > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>>>> -------------------------------------------------- > >>>>>>> Verify the correspondence of the addressee; otherwise, notify that > to > >>>>>>> the sender and, conscious of the responsibility for the undue use, > >>>>>>> destroy the message and its copies. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>>>> -------------------------------------------------- > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -- > >>>>>> Carlos Rovira > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >> > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fclicktime.symantec.com%2F38jVp7aJ4ouZou8k1qd97Hn7Vc%3Fu%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fabout.me%252Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C950f12a2b0f24cad192508d6ccaf8241%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636921451512487013&sdata=EJE8iBmKz3wl8nUyLoeMlxg%2ByDKKSbSGkv%2FaI1KudZU%3D&reserved=0 > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Carlos Rovira > >>> > >> > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C950f12a2b0f24cad192508d6ccaf8241%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636921451512487013&sdata=HqD%2BhpX%2BM36WaF0edrKO5MlYZnIZCuVibKBN3pLx%2FKg%3D&reserved=0 > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > -- > > > > Piotr Zarzycki > > > > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki > > <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>* > > -- Piotr Zarzycki Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
