Great, this looks good to me. In this way, we don't need to pay a lot of attention and can provide multiple language documentation. And I also prefer that we only need to keep English documentation now.
Thanks, Wenjun Ruan On Sun, Apr 24, 2022 at 3:39 PM CalvinKirs <[email protected]> wrote: > > Multilingual versions will become a burden in the future. Whether it is for > the community or users, I prefer to keep only English documents. Jiajie > proposed a method [1] to solve the problem of document language, which I > prefer. > > [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-seatunnel/issues/1437 > > > Best wishes！ > Calvin Kirs > > > On 04/24/2022 14:04，wenjun<[email protected]> wrote： > Hi Fanjia, > > Thanks for your opinion, so you suggest that we need to maintain the > Chinese documentation, and when contributors contribute a new feature, > there is no mandatory for him to update the Chinese documentation. But > he still needs to copy the English documentation into the Chinese > folder. And we accept the PR about Chinese documentation. > This way is similar to the first one. In this way, the community may > need to pay more attention to reviewing the PR to avoid > inconsistencies in the two kinds of documentation. > > Thanks, > Wenjun Ruan > > On Sun, Apr 24, 2022 at 12:01 PM 范佳 <[email protected]> wrote: > > This is my opinon: > If the contributor only has the English version of the document, then they > need to copy the document to the corresponding folder of the Chinese version, > and then others can directly modify the Chinese version of the document after > translation. At the same time, you can also know that those Chinese version > documents have not been translated. > > 2022年4月24日 11:51，wenjun <[email protected]> 写道： > > Hi community, > > Right now, we have complete documentation in English[1]. And once a > contributor contributes a new PR, he needs to update the English > documentation, this can help us easily to maintain our documentation. > And there still exists Chinese documentation in our repo, and the > Chinese documentation is behind a lot[2]. > > This mail thread mainly wants to talk about do we need to maintain > Chinese documentation. There are some practices we can choose. > > 1. Maintain the Chinese version documentation, and once the > contributor contributes a new PR, he needs to update both English and > Chinese documentation. > 2. Maintain the Chinese version documentation, and once the > contributor contributes a new PR, he only needs to update the English > version documentation, and we still accept the PR about Chinese > documentation. > 3. Don't maintain the Chinese version documentation, delete the > current Chinese documentation, and don't accept the PR about Chinese > documentation. > > If you have any other practices, please feel free to join this discussion. > > [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-seatunnel/tree/dev/docs/en > [2] https://github.com/apache/incubator-seatunnel/tree/dev/docs/zh-CN > > Thanks, > Wenjun Ruan >
