Hi Guys,

It is great to see your enthusiasm for the project!  I still need to go
through the process of moving the project to attic in Apache, but I don't
see why you cant take the pieces you want and start a "new" project
elsewhere.

On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 5:07 PM Raj Janorkar <raj.janor...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thats Great Site Darren.
> Lets give new life to Shindig.
>
> I am sure there are so many other sites using shindig.
>
> Regards, Raj
>
> On Monday 9 November 2015, Darren Bond <db...@globalcad.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Raj,
> >
> > We did the same and produced www.blueg.com
> >
> > Happy to share some experiences too.
> >
> > Kind regards,
> >
> > Darren
> >
> > ----- Reply message -----
> > From: "Raj Janorkar" <raj.janor...@gmail.com <javascript:;>>
> > To: "Chris Spiliotopoulos" <chrysanthos.spiliotopou...@gmail.com
> > <javascript:;>>
> > Cc: "dev@shindig.apache.org <javascript:;>" <dev@shindig.apache.org
> > <javascript:;>>
> > Subject: Terminate the Apache Shindig Project
> > Date: Sun, Nov 8, 2015 12:51 PM
> >
> > Just to let you know
> >
> > I was fan of iGoogle, which is closed in 13. So as a fun and learn
> > something i have implemented it - www.igoogleportal.com
> >
> > I can definitely share some working examples.
> >
> > Cheers.
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 10:15 PM, Chris Spiliotopoulos <
> > chrysanthos.spiliotopou...@gmail.com <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Raj,
> > >
> > > well I guess this makes 2 of us!  Let's wait for what others have to
> say
> > > just to get a clear view of all the perspectives.
> > >
> > > Cheers
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 2:10 PM, Raj Janorkar <raj.janor...@gmail.com
> > <javascript:;>>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi Chris,
> > >> i am ready.
> > >> Last year i was thinking to write documentation with examples but
> > couldn't
> > >> do that. i hate apache way of trunk and website.
> > >>
> > >> This time i can help creating few html pages.
> > >>
> > >> Regards,
> > >> Raj
> > >>
> > >> On Sunday 8 November 2015, Chris Spiliotopoulos <
> > >> chrysanthos.spiliotopou...@gmail.com <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Hi all,
> > >> >
> > >> > having listened carefully to all the voices from the community so
> > far, I
> > >> > have come down to the following conclusion.
> > >> >
> > >> > There are many professionals among us that have been working in the
> > >> shadows
> > >> > supporting this project in diverse ways - evangelizing, advocating,
> > >> > integrating, etc. without the 'shoulders' of a bold-named company
> like
> > >> > Google or IBM (who has been the active maintainer of this project
> for
> > a
> > >> > number of years now).
> > >> >
> > >> > My gut feeling so far has told me that - as has already happened
> with
> > >> many
> > >> > other technologies - these companies usually invest an amount of
> time
> > >> and
> > >> > money for experimenting with different types of technologies and if
> > >> things
> > >> > don't go as planned in the long run, what seems to be happening is
> > that
> > >> > some other company takes over on the experiment and so on, until no
> > big
> > >> > name is really interested any more.
> > >> >
> > >> > During this lifecycle, many other companies are starting to adopt
> the
> > >> > technologies and they are indeed putting them into good use to serve
> > >> their
> > >> > purposes.  And this is exactly where we stand at the moment.  I can
> > >> totally
> > >> > understand the feelings coming from Ichiro and Darren and at the
> same
> > >> time
> > >> > I get Ryan's point of view.  So how do we handle this situation?
> > >> Speaking
> > >> > for myself, as I come from Greece and I have to live and work in a
> > >> country
> > >> > that is in crisis mode for quite a few years now, all I can say is
> > that
> > >> a
> > >> > crisis can be the mother of invention and change for a better
> > tomorrow.
> > >> > And this is exactly how I see this situation - in a metaphorical way
> > of
> > >> > course :)
> > >> >
> > >> > I think that now is the right time to make a change.  Things have
> > >> changed
> > >> > in our industry during the last 10 years and so have trends and
> > >> > communities.  Maybe 10 years ago, the Apache Foundation was the
> place
> > >> to be
> > >> > but now this is definitely not the case - of course this doesn't
> mean
> > >> that
> > >> > the foundation is not the birthplace of great technologies.  But all
> > the
> > >> > action now is over at GitHub.
> > >> >
> > >> > So, since Ryan gave us the green light (from the foundation's
> > >> perspective)
> > >> > that the project can be migrated, I'm outlining my proposals:
> > >> >
> > >> >    - We break down the Shindig project into a number of distinct
> > parts -
> > >> >    personally I've never used the OpenSocial features and have no
> > >> interest
> > >> > in
> > >> >    them since I'm heavily focused on the gadget containment and
> > >> rendering
> > >> >    facilities.  But there are people like Rene who have invested a
> lot
> > >> of
> > >> > time
> > >> >    and work on extending the OpenSocial features.
> > >> >    - We give it a brand new name - never liked the name Shindig in
> the
> > >> >    first place (speaking for myself once more).  I think that this
> is
> > >> very
> > >> >    important since we want to make a bold statement to communities
> > that
> > >> > this
> > >> >    technology is active, we're using it and others should try it out
> > >> > because
> > >> >    it may solve them a number of problems.
> > >> >    - Create a modern web site on GitHub where we can all share our
> > >> >    experiences through show cases, usage examples and tutorials
> > >> >    - We start thinking around the concept of a gadget-centered
> > >> marketplace
> > >> >    - in the context of show casing stuff.  If I remember correctly
> > >> Darren's
> > >> >    team has already launched a project which is very similar to the
> > >> iGoogle
> > >> >    web site so he could certainly provide some ideas.
> > >> >    - Issues and feature requests can be handled directly though
> GitHub
> > >> in a
> > >> >    more agile and community oriented approach without any of the
> > >> > bureaucratic
> > >> >    processes imposed by the Apache Foundation.  Once the 'monolith'
> is
> > >> > broken
> > >> >    down into different projects then it would be more manageable and
> > >> people
> > >> >    having certain skills could join forces
> > >> >    - By utilizing technologies like Docker there is no need for
> > hosting
> > >> >    resources and sample material - we can bundle our examples, show
> > >> cases,
> > >> > etc
> > >> >    in self-sufficient Docker images and host them over @ DockerHub.
> > The
> > >> >    integration with GitHub is seamless so this is a no brainer
> > >> >    - Reach out to Atlassian, Jive and the rest of the companies who
> we
> > >> know
> > >> >    for sure that they have invested a lot in this technology (and
> > >> actively
> > >> > use
> > >> >    it) to help with this effort - e.g. Atlassian has extended
> Shindig
> > >> >    container & engine to meet their requirements and they definitely
> > >> have
> > >> > devs
> > >> >    who know the bits and pieces
> > >> >
> > >> > So the question now for me is really simple.  How many of us want to
> > >> move
> > >> > over to the next phase without getting into any sort of credibility
> > >> issues
> > >> > regarding our choices?  +1 from me.
> > >> >
> > >> > Kind regards,
> > >> > Chris
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 2:49 AM, Ryan Baxter <rbaxte...@apache.org
> > <javascript:;>
> > >> > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > I completely understand.  I can't speak to the continued support
> of
> > >> > vendors
> > >> > > who have adopted Shindig, but I would imagine that they can't just
> > >> stop
> > >> > > supporting the products consuming Shindig.  I am sorry that this
> > puts
> > >> you
> > >> > > in a tough position but this is a natural cycle of open source
> > >> software.
> > >> > > With no community willing to support and enhance the project there
> > is
> > >> not
> > >> > > much we can do.  If someone takes the code and the project regains
> > >> life
> > >> > > somewhere else, that is great.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 6:22 PM Ichiro Furusato <
> > >> > ichiro.furus...@gmail.com <javascript:;> <javascript:;>>
> > >>
> > >> > > wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > Hi Ryan,
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > While the code is stable and available I can't go to our CIO and
> > >> > > architects
> > >> > > > and
> > >> > > > advocate use of a project as the basis for our online delivery
> if
> > >> the
> > >> > > > project has
> > >> > > > folded. We were planning to replace literally five separate
> legacy
> > >> > > portals
> > >> > > > (that
> > >> > > > have been accumulating like mold rather than serve as
> > replacements)
> > >> > using
> > >> > > > Liferay, with our online widgets being replaced by Open Social
> > >> Gadgets.
> > >> > > > With
> > >> > > > the demise of Shindig I assume Liferay's support of embedded
> > Shindig
> > >> > will
> > >> > > > likely disappear, and therefore my ability to advocate for its
> > use.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > It's not the availability of the code, it's the living status of
> > the
> > >> > > > project. If the
> > >> > > > project is dead I can't very well suggest we base millions of
> > >> dollars
> > >> > of
> > >> > > > online
> > >> > > > delivery over the next 5-10 years on it. As I am responsible for
> > >> that
> > >> > > > decision
> > >> > > > I could hardly be said to be responsible in advocating for its
> use
> > >> at
> > >> > > this
> > >> > > > stage.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Sadly.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Cheers,
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Ichiro
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 3:01 AM, Ryan Baxter <
> rbaxte...@gmail.com
> > <javascript:;>
> > >> > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > > Ichiro, while the project will move to the attic, it doesn't
> > mean
> > >> you
> > >> > > > can't
> > >> > > > > continue to use it.  If it is stable enough as it is right now
> > for
> > >> > you
> > >> > > > than
> > >> > > > > you should be able to continue to use it as is.
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 5:59 AM Ichiro Furusato <
> > >> > > > ichiro.furus...@gmail.com <javascript:;> <javascript:;>>
> > >>
> > >> > > > > wrote:
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > > To add just one more voice to the chorus, I'm likewise very
> > sad
> > >> to
> > >> > > hear
> > >> > > > > of
> > >> > > > > > the demise of what
> > >> > > > > > seemed (until this notice) to be a functional and mature
> > >> project.
> > >> > For
> > >> > > > the
> > >> > > > > > past nine months I have
> > >> > > > > > advocated replacing the four (!) existing (legacy) aviation
> > and
> > >> > > > industry
> > >> > > > > > delivery platforms of the
> > >> > > > > > Meteorological Service of New Zealand (MetService) with a
> > >> > > > Liferay/Shindig
> > >> > > > > > based site. Over the
> > >> > > > > > past year we prototyped a replacement service and are
> > currently
> > >> > > > awaiting
> > >> > > > > > the next project
> > >> > > > > > funding cycle. Having to go back to our executive management
> > >> team
> > >> > and
> > >> > > > > tell
> > >> > > > > > them that the
> > >> > > > > > basic architecture of our proposed service is somewhat
> > >> > embarrassing,
> > >> > > > and
> > >> > > > > we
> > >> > > > > > will likewise now
> > >> > > > > > need to reevaluate and design a new solution. As the lead
> > >> designer
> > >> > I
> > >> > > > have
> > >> > > > > > been quite happy
> > >> > > > > > with the Shindig/Open Social Gadget technology, and we had
> > >> looked
> > >> > > > forward
> > >> > > > > > to a robust
> > >> > > > > > implementation cycle, replacing fifteen years of crufty
> > service
> > >> > with
> > >> > > a
> > >> > > > > > shiny new Gadget-based
> > >> > > > > > solution.
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > Sincere thanks to the development team for an excellent job,
> > >> very
> > >> > > sorry
> > >> > > > > to
> > >> > > > > > hear about it being
> > >> > > > > > put into the Attic. There may have been inactivity in the
> dev
> > >> side
> > >> > at
> > >> > > > > > Apache but we were actively
> > >> > > > > > using, and planning to use it for a substantial part of our
> > >> online
> > >> > > > > weather
> > >> > > > > > delivery solution.
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > Ichiro
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 7:31 AM, Ryan Baxter <
> > >> rbaxte...@apache.org <javascript:;>
> > >> > <javascript:;>>
> > >>
> > >> > > > > wrote:
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > Hi fellow Shindig Devs,
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > I would like to let you all know that the Shindig PMC has
> > >> voted
> > >> > to
> > >> > > > > > > terminate the Shindig project and move it to the attic.  I
> > >> have
> > >> > > > already
> > >> > > > > > > informed the Apache board about the termination in this
> > months
> > >> > > board
> > >> > > > > > report
> > >> > > > > > > (below).
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > As most of you have probably noticed we have seen a
> decline
> > in
> > >> > > > > > > participation in all aspects of the project over the past
> > >> months
> > >> > > and
> > >> > > > > the
> > >> > > > > > > downward trend has been happening for over a year now.
> This
> > >> can
> > >> > > > > > certainly
> > >> > > > > > > be seen in our reports to the board [1].
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > If anyone has any questions please let me know, and I will
> > be
> > >> > sure
> > >> > > to
> > >> > > > > > keep
> > >> > > > > > > everyone up to date as we transition the project to the
> > attic.
> > >> > > > Thanks.
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > -Ryan
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > [1]
> > >> > > >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SHINDIG/Board+Reports
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> > >> > > > > > > From: Ryan Baxter <rbaxte...@apache.org <javascript:;>
> > <javascript:;>>
> > >> > > > > > > Date: Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 9:29 PM
> > >> > > > > > > Subject: Terminate the Apache Shindig Project
> > >> > > > > > > To: bo...@apache.org <javascript:;> <javascript:;> <
> > bo...@apache.org <javascript:;>
> > >> > <javascript:;>>
> > >> > > > > > > Cc: priv...@shindig.apache.org <javascript:;>
> > <javascript:;> <
> > >> > priv...@shindig.apache.org <javascript:;> <javascript:;>>
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > WHEREAS, the Project Management Committee of the Apache
> > >> > > DirectMemory
> > >> > > > > > > project has chosen by vote to recommend moving the project
> > to
> > >> the
> > >> > > > > > >  Attic; and
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it no longer in the
> > best
> > >> > > > > > > interest of the Foundation to continue the Apache Shindig
> > >> project
> > >> > > > > > > due to inactivity;
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Apache Shindig
> > >> > > > > > > project is hereby terminated; and be it further
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > RESOLVED, that the Attic PMC be and hereby is tasked with
> > >> > > > > > > oversight over the software developed by the Apache
> Shindig
> > >> > > > > > > Project; and be it further
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache
> > Shindig"
> > >> is
> > >> > > > > > > hereby terminated; and be it further
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Shindig PMC is hereby
> terminated.
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > --
> > >> > Chris Spiliotopoulos
> > >> >
> > >> > Solutions Architect | @LinkedIn
> > >> > <https://www.linkedin.com/pub/chris-spiliotopoulos>| @Twitter
> > >> > <https://twitter.com/chefArchitect>
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Chris Spiliotopoulos
> > >
> > > Solutions Architect | @LinkedIn
> > > <https://www.linkedin.com/pub/chris-spiliotopoulos>| @Twitter
> > > <https://twitter.com/chefArchitect>
> > >
> > >
>

Reply via email to