Raj,

I think rushing into things will just bring us to the same situation but at
a different location this time.

Let's just leave Ryan to do what he's been told to do and wait for others
input regarding the calls to action I suggested.  If we really want to make
a fresh start, then this should include a new perspective on things and
processes.

I can hardly agree with you regarding the monolith project - I think that
if someone wants to put a 'body tag' on this thing is to just leave it as
it is.  Let's just wait for others to give their feedback on the renaming
and splitting options and I'm sure that things will get clearer.

Regards,
Chris

On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 3:16 AM Raj Janorkar <raj.janor...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Okay.
>
> Thank you Ryan.
>
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 11:12 AM, Ryan Baxter <rbaxte...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Raj, I need to check with the board about what to do here.  The board
> voted
> > to move the project to the attic so I have a feeling that will need to
> > happen first to officially retire the project in the Apache's eyes.  Then
> > you can take the code and do what you please with the code.  At this
> point
> > since the project has officially been terminated I don't think we can do
> a
> > release.
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 8:07 PM Raj Janorkar <raj.janor...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Ryan,
> > >
> > > Before moving to Github, It would be great to release the FINAL version
> > > with all the changes done in since last release.
> > >
> > > What says?
> > >
> > > On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 11:05 AM, Raj Janorkar <raj.janor...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Ryan,
> > > >
> > > > Thank you.
> > > >
> > > > I think it would be good if we officially move this project to
> github.
> > If
> > > > not possible then put this project to attic and then just create
> single
> > > > copy on github, so that we have one project for all dev community to
> > > > concentrate on. Otherwise we will end up creating same project in
> > > different
> > > > places with different versions and customization which is very hard
> to
> > > > track and focus on.
> > > >
> > > > If you all okay i can checkout the project from apache and put it
> into
> > > > github, if there is way anybody know directly moving from apache to
> > > github
> > > > then we can do that way.
> > > >
> > > > What you think about this Ryan/Chris/Darren and all others?
> > > >
> > > > Thank You.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 10:52 AM, Ryan Baxter <rbaxte...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Hi Guys,
> > > >>
> > > >> It is great to see your enthusiasm for the project!  I still need to
> > go
> > > >> through the process of moving the project to attic in Apache, but I
> > > don't
> > > >> see why you cant take the pieces you want and start a "new" project
> > > >> elsewhere.
> > > >>
> > > >> On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 5:07 PM Raj Janorkar <raj.janor...@gmail.com
> >
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> Thats Great Site Darren.
> > > >>> Lets give new life to Shindig.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I am sure there are so many other sites using shindig.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Regards, Raj
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On Monday 9 November 2015, Darren Bond <db...@globalcad.com>
> wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> > Hi Raj,
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> > We did the same and produced www.blueg.com
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> > Happy to share some experiences too.
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> > Kind regards,
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> > Darren
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> > ----- Reply message -----
> > > >>> > From: "Raj Janorkar" <raj.janor...@gmail.com <javascript:;>>
> > > >>> > To: "Chris Spiliotopoulos" <chrysanthos.spiliotopou...@gmail.com
> > > >>> > <javascript:;>>
> > > >>> > Cc: "dev@shindig.apache.org <javascript:;>" <
> > dev@shindig.apache.org
> > > >>> > <javascript:;>>
> > > >>> > Subject: Terminate the Apache Shindig Project
> > > >>> > Date: Sun, Nov 8, 2015 12:51 PM
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> > Just to let you know
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> > I was fan of iGoogle, which is closed in 13. So as a fun and
> learn
> > > >>> > something i have implemented it - www.igoogleportal.com
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> > I can definitely share some working examples.
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> > Cheers.
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> > On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 10:15 PM, Chris Spiliotopoulos <
> > > >>> > chrysanthos.spiliotopou...@gmail.com <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> > > Hi Raj,
> > > >>> > >
> > > >>> > > well I guess this makes 2 of us!  Let's wait for what others
> have
> > > to
> > > >>> say
> > > >>> > > just to get a clear view of all the perspectives.
> > > >>> > >
> > > >>> > > Cheers
> > > >>> > >
> > > >>> > >
> > > >>> > >
> > > >>> > > On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 2:10 PM, Raj Janorkar <
> > > raj.janor...@gmail.com
> > > >>> > <javascript:;>>
> > > >>> > > wrote:
> > > >>> > >
> > > >>> > >> Hi Chris,
> > > >>> > >> i am ready.
> > > >>> > >> Last year i was thinking to write documentation with examples
> > but
> > > >>> > couldn't
> > > >>> > >> do that. i hate apache way of trunk and website.
> > > >>> > >>
> > > >>> > >> This time i can help creating few html pages.
> > > >>> > >>
> > > >>> > >> Regards,
> > > >>> > >> Raj
> > > >>> > >>
> > > >>> > >> On Sunday 8 November 2015, Chris Spiliotopoulos <
> > > >>> > >> chrysanthos.spiliotopou...@gmail.com <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > > >>> > >>
> > > >>> > >> > Hi all,
> > > >>> > >> >
> > > >>> > >> > having listened carefully to all the voices from the
> community
> > > so
> > > >>> > far, I
> > > >>> > >> > have come down to the following conclusion.
> > > >>> > >> >
> > > >>> > >> > There are many professionals among us that have been working
> > in
> > > >>> the
> > > >>> > >> shadows
> > > >>> > >> > supporting this project in diverse ways - evangelizing,
> > > >>> advocating,
> > > >>> > >> > integrating, etc. without the 'shoulders' of a bold-named
> > > company
> > > >>> like
> > > >>> > >> > Google or IBM (who has been the active maintainer of this
> > > project
> > > >>> for
> > > >>> > a
> > > >>> > >> > number of years now).
> > > >>> > >> >
> > > >>> > >> > My gut feeling so far has told me that - as has already
> > happened
> > > >>> with
> > > >>> > >> many
> > > >>> > >> > other technologies - these companies usually invest an
> amount
> > of
> > > >>> time
> > > >>> > >> and
> > > >>> > >> > money for experimenting with different types of technologies
> > and
> > > >>> if
> > > >>> > >> things
> > > >>> > >> > don't go as planned in the long run, what seems to be
> > happening
> > > is
> > > >>> > that
> > > >>> > >> > some other company takes over on the experiment and so on,
> > until
> > > >>> no
> > > >>> > big
> > > >>> > >> > name is really interested any more.
> > > >>> > >> >
> > > >>> > >> > During this lifecycle, many other companies are starting to
> > > adopt
> > > >>> the
> > > >>> > >> > technologies and they are indeed putting them into good use
> to
> > > >>> serve
> > > >>> > >> their
> > > >>> > >> > purposes.  And this is exactly where we stand at the moment.
> > I
> > > >>> can
> > > >>> > >> totally
> > > >>> > >> > understand the feelings coming from Ichiro and Darren and at
> > the
> > > >>> same
> > > >>> > >> time
> > > >>> > >> > I get Ryan's point of view.  So how do we handle this
> > situation?
> > > >>> > >> Speaking
> > > >>> > >> > for myself, as I come from Greece and I have to live and
> work
> > > in a
> > > >>> > >> country
> > > >>> > >> > that is in crisis mode for quite a few years now, all I can
> > say
> > > is
> > > >>> > that
> > > >>> > >> a
> > > >>> > >> > crisis can be the mother of invention and change for a
> better
> > > >>> > tomorrow.
> > > >>> > >> > And this is exactly how I see this situation - in a
> > metaphorical
> > > >>> way
> > > >>> > of
> > > >>> > >> > course :)
> > > >>> > >> >
> > > >>> > >> > I think that now is the right time to make a change.  Things
> > > have
> > > >>> > >> changed
> > > >>> > >> > in our industry during the last 10 years and so have trends
> > and
> > > >>> > >> > communities.  Maybe 10 years ago, the Apache Foundation was
> > the
> > > >>> place
> > > >>> > >> to be
> > > >>> > >> > but now this is definitely not the case - of course this
> > doesn't
> > > >>> mean
> > > >>> > >> that
> > > >>> > >> > the foundation is not the birthplace of great technologies.
> > But
> > > >>> all
> > > >>> > the
> > > >>> > >> > action now is over at GitHub.
> > > >>> > >> >
> > > >>> > >> > So, since Ryan gave us the green light (from the
> foundation's
> > > >>> > >> perspective)
> > > >>> > >> > that the project can be migrated, I'm outlining my
> proposals:
> > > >>> > >> >
> > > >>> > >> >    - We break down the Shindig project into a number of
> > distinct
> > > >>> > parts -
> > > >>> > >> >    personally I've never used the OpenSocial features and
> have
> > > no
> > > >>> > >> interest
> > > >>> > >> > in
> > > >>> > >> >    them since I'm heavily focused on the gadget containment
> > and
> > > >>> > >> rendering
> > > >>> > >> >    facilities.  But there are people like Rene who have
> > invested
> > > >>> a lot
> > > >>> > >> of
> > > >>> > >> > time
> > > >>> > >> >    and work on extending the OpenSocial features.
> > > >>> > >> >    - We give it a brand new name - never liked the name
> > Shindig
> > > >>> in the
> > > >>> > >> >    first place (speaking for myself once more).  I think
> that
> > > >>> this is
> > > >>> > >> very
> > > >>> > >> >    important since we want to make a bold statement to
> > > communities
> > > >>> > that
> > > >>> > >> > this
> > > >>> > >> >    technology is active, we're using it and others should
> try
> > it
> > > >>> out
> > > >>> > >> > because
> > > >>> > >> >    it may solve them a number of problems.
> > > >>> > >> >    - Create a modern web site on GitHub where we can all
> share
> > > our
> > > >>> > >> >    experiences through show cases, usage examples and
> > tutorials
> > > >>> > >> >    - We start thinking around the concept of a
> gadget-centered
> > > >>> > >> marketplace
> > > >>> > >> >    - in the context of show casing stuff.  If I remember
> > > correctly
> > > >>> > >> Darren's
> > > >>> > >> >    team has already launched a project which is very similar
> > to
> > > >>> the
> > > >>> > >> iGoogle
> > > >>> > >> >    web site so he could certainly provide some ideas.
> > > >>> > >> >    - Issues and feature requests can be handled directly
> > though
> > > >>> GitHub
> > > >>> > >> in a
> > > >>> > >> >    more agile and community oriented approach without any of
> > the
> > > >>> > >> > bureaucratic
> > > >>> > >> >    processes imposed by the Apache Foundation.  Once the
> > > >>> 'monolith' is
> > > >>> > >> > broken
> > > >>> > >> >    down into different projects then it would be more
> > manageable
> > > >>> and
> > > >>> > >> people
> > > >>> > >> >    having certain skills could join forces
> > > >>> > >> >    - By utilizing technologies like Docker there is no need
> > for
> > > >>> > hosting
> > > >>> > >> >    resources and sample material - we can bundle our
> examples,
> > > >>> show
> > > >>> > >> cases,
> > > >>> > >> > etc
> > > >>> > >> >    in self-sufficient Docker images and host them over @
> > > >>> DockerHub.
> > > >>> > The
> > > >>> > >> >    integration with GitHub is seamless so this is a no
> brainer
> > > >>> > >> >    - Reach out to Atlassian, Jive and the rest of the
> > companies
> > > >>> who we
> > > >>> > >> know
> > > >>> > >> >    for sure that they have invested a lot in this technology
> > > (and
> > > >>> > >> actively
> > > >>> > >> > use
> > > >>> > >> >    it) to help with this effort - e.g. Atlassian has
> extended
> > > >>> Shindig
> > > >>> > >> >    container & engine to meet their requirements and they
> > > >>> definitely
> > > >>> > >> have
> > > >>> > >> > devs
> > > >>> > >> >    who know the bits and pieces
> > > >>> > >> >
> > > >>> > >> > So the question now for me is really simple.  How many of us
> > > want
> > > >>> to
> > > >>> > >> move
> > > >>> > >> > over to the next phase without getting into any sort of
> > > >>> credibility
> > > >>> > >> issues
> > > >>> > >> > regarding our choices?  +1 from me.
> > > >>> > >> >
> > > >>> > >> > Kind regards,
> > > >>> > >> > Chris
> > > >>> > >> >
> > > >>> > >> >
> > > >>> > >> > On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 2:49 AM, Ryan Baxter <
> > > rbaxte...@apache.org
> > > >>> > <javascript:;>
> > > >>> > >> > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > > >>> > >> >
> > > >>> > >> > > I completely understand.  I can't speak to the continued
> > > >>> support of
> > > >>> > >> > vendors
> > > >>> > >> > > who have adopted Shindig, but I would imagine that they
> > can't
> > > >>> just
> > > >>> > >> stop
> > > >>> > >> > > supporting the products consuming Shindig.  I am sorry
> that
> > > this
> > > >>> > puts
> > > >>> > >> you
> > > >>> > >> > > in a tough position but this is a natural cycle of open
> > source
> > > >>> > >> software.
> > > >>> > >> > > With no community willing to support and enhance the
> project
> > > >>> there
> > > >>> > is
> > > >>> > >> not
> > > >>> > >> > > much we can do.  If someone takes the code and the project
> > > >>> regains
> > > >>> > >> life
> > > >>> > >> > > somewhere else, that is great.
> > > >>> > >> > >
> > > >>> > >> > > On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 6:22 PM Ichiro Furusato <
> > > >>> > >> > ichiro.furus...@gmail.com <javascript:;> <javascript:;>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> > >>
> > > >>> > >> > > wrote:
> > > >>> > >> > >
> > > >>> > >> > > > Hi Ryan,
> > > >>> > >> > > >
> > > >>> > >> > > > While the code is stable and available I can't go to our
> > CIO
> > > >>> and
> > > >>> > >> > > architects
> > > >>> > >> > > > and
> > > >>> > >> > > > advocate use of a project as the basis for our online
> > > >>> delivery if
> > > >>> > >> the
> > > >>> > >> > > > project has
> > > >>> > >> > > > folded. We were planning to replace literally five
> > separate
> > > >>> legacy
> > > >>> > >> > > portals
> > > >>> > >> > > > (that
> > > >>> > >> > > > have been accumulating like mold rather than serve as
> > > >>> > replacements)
> > > >>> > >> > using
> > > >>> > >> > > > Liferay, with our online widgets being replaced by Open
> > > Social
> > > >>> > >> Gadgets.
> > > >>> > >> > > > With
> > > >>> > >> > > > the demise of Shindig I assume Liferay's support of
> > embedded
> > > >>> > Shindig
> > > >>> > >> > will
> > > >>> > >> > > > likely disappear, and therefore my ability to advocate
> for
> > > its
> > > >>> > use.
> > > >>> > >> > > >
> > > >>> > >> > > > It's not the availability of the code, it's the living
> > > status
> > > >>> of
> > > >>> > the
> > > >>> > >> > > > project. If the
> > > >>> > >> > > > project is dead I can't very well suggest we base
> millions
> > > of
> > > >>> > >> dollars
> > > >>> > >> > of
> > > >>> > >> > > > online
> > > >>> > >> > > > delivery over the next 5-10 years on it. As I am
> > responsible
> > > >>> for
> > > >>> > >> that
> > > >>> > >> > > > decision
> > > >>> > >> > > > I could hardly be said to be responsible in advocating
> for
> > > >>> its use
> > > >>> > >> at
> > > >>> > >> > > this
> > > >>> > >> > > > stage.
> > > >>> > >> > > >
> > > >>> > >> > > > Sadly.
> > > >>> > >> > > >
> > > >>> > >> > > > Cheers,
> > > >>> > >> > > >
> > > >>> > >> > > > Ichiro
> > > >>> > >> > > >
> > > >>> > >> > > > On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 3:01 AM, Ryan Baxter <
> > > >>> rbaxte...@gmail.com
> > > >>> > <javascript:;>
> > > >>> > >> > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > > >>> > >> > > >
> > > >>> > >> > > > > Ichiro, while the project will move to the attic, it
> > > doesn't
> > > >>> > mean
> > > >>> > >> you
> > > >>> > >> > > > can't
> > > >>> > >> > > > > continue to use it.  If it is stable enough as it is
> > right
> > > >>> now
> > > >>> > for
> > > >>> > >> > you
> > > >>> > >> > > > than
> > > >>> > >> > > > > you should be able to continue to use it as is.
> > > >>> > >> > > > >
> > > >>> > >> > > > > On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 5:59 AM Ichiro Furusato <
> > > >>> > >> > > > ichiro.furus...@gmail.com <javascript:;>
> <javascript:;>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> > >>
> > > >>> > >> > > > > wrote:
> > > >>> > >> > > > >
> > > >>> > >> > > > > > To add just one more voice to the chorus, I'm
> likewise
> > > >>> very
> > > >>> > sad
> > > >>> > >> to
> > > >>> > >> > > hear
> > > >>> > >> > > > > of
> > > >>> > >> > > > > > the demise of what
> > > >>> > >> > > > > > seemed (until this notice) to be a functional and
> > mature
> > > >>> > >> project.
> > > >>> > >> > For
> > > >>> > >> > > > the
> > > >>> > >> > > > > > past nine months I have
> > > >>> > >> > > > > > advocated replacing the four (!) existing (legacy)
> > > >>> aviation
> > > >>> > and
> > > >>> > >> > > > industry
> > > >>> > >> > > > > > delivery platforms of the
> > > >>> > >> > > > > > Meteorological Service of New Zealand (MetService)
> > with
> > > a
> > > >>> > >> > > > Liferay/Shindig
> > > >>> > >> > > > > > based site. Over the
> > > >>> > >> > > > > > past year we prototyped a replacement service and
> are
> > > >>> > currently
> > > >>> > >> > > > awaiting
> > > >>> > >> > > > > > the next project
> > > >>> > >> > > > > > funding cycle. Having to go back to our executive
> > > >>> management
> > > >>> > >> team
> > > >>> > >> > and
> > > >>> > >> > > > > tell
> > > >>> > >> > > > > > them that the
> > > >>> > >> > > > > > basic architecture of our proposed service is
> somewhat
> > > >>> > >> > embarrassing,
> > > >>> > >> > > > and
> > > >>> > >> > > > > we
> > > >>> > >> > > > > > will likewise now
> > > >>> > >> > > > > > need to reevaluate and design a new solution. As the
> > > lead
> > > >>> > >> designer
> > > >>> > >> > I
> > > >>> > >> > > > have
> > > >>> > >> > > > > > been quite happy
> > > >>> > >> > > > > > with the Shindig/Open Social Gadget technology, and
> we
> > > had
> > > >>> > >> looked
> > > >>> > >> > > > forward
> > > >>> > >> > > > > > to a robust
> > > >>> > >> > > > > > implementation cycle, replacing fifteen years of
> > crufty
> > > >>> > service
> > > >>> > >> > with
> > > >>> > >> > > a
> > > >>> > >> > > > > > shiny new Gadget-based
> > > >>> > >> > > > > > solution.
> > > >>> > >> > > > > >
> > > >>> > >> > > > > > Sincere thanks to the development team for an
> > excellent
> > > >>> job,
> > > >>> > >> very
> > > >>> > >> > > sorry
> > > >>> > >> > > > > to
> > > >>> > >> > > > > > hear about it being
> > > >>> > >> > > > > > put into the Attic. There may have been inactivity
> in
> > > the
> > > >>> dev
> > > >>> > >> side
> > > >>> > >> > at
> > > >>> > >> > > > > > Apache but we were actively
> > > >>> > >> > > > > > using, and planning to use it for a substantial part
> > of
> > > >>> our
> > > >>> > >> online
> > > >>> > >> > > > > weather
> > > >>> > >> > > > > > delivery solution.
> > > >>> > >> > > > > >
> > > >>> > >> > > > > > Ichiro
> > > >>> > >> > > > > >
> > > >>> > >> > > > > > On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 7:31 AM, Ryan Baxter <
> > > >>> > >> rbaxte...@apache.org <javascript:;>
> > > >>> > >> > <javascript:;>>
> > > >>> > >>
> > > >>> > >> > > > > wrote:
> > > >>> > >> > > > > >
> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > Hi fellow Shindig Devs,
> > > >>> > >> > > > > > >
> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > I would like to let you all know that the Shindig
> > PMC
> > > >>> has
> > > >>> > >> voted
> > > >>> > >> > to
> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > terminate the Shindig project and move it to the
> > > >>> attic.  I
> > > >>> > >> have
> > > >>> > >> > > > already
> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > informed the Apache board about the termination in
> > > this
> > > >>> > months
> > > >>> > >> > > board
> > > >>> > >> > > > > > report
> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > (below).
> > > >>> > >> > > > > > >
> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > As most of you have probably noticed we have seen
> a
> > > >>> decline
> > > >>> > in
> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > participation in all aspects of the project over
> the
> > > >>> past
> > > >>> > >> months
> > > >>> > >> > > and
> > > >>> > >> > > > > the
> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > downward trend has been happening for over a year
> > now.
> > > >>> This
> > > >>> > >> can
> > > >>> > >> > > > > > certainly
> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > be seen in our reports to the board [1].
> > > >>> > >> > > > > > >
> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > If anyone has any questions please let me know,
> and
> > I
> > > >>> will
> > > >>> > be
> > > >>> > >> > sure
> > > >>> > >> > > to
> > > >>> > >> > > > > > keep
> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > everyone up to date as we transition the project
> to
> > > the
> > > >>> > attic.
> > > >>> > >> > > > Thanks.
> > > >>> > >> > > > > > >
> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > -Ryan
> > > >>> > >> > > > > > >
> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > [1]
> > > >>> > >> > > >
> > > >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SHINDIG/Board+Reports
> > > >>> > >> > > > > > >
> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > From: Ryan Baxter <rbaxte...@apache.org
> > > <javascript:;>
> > > >>> > <javascript:;>>
> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > Date: Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 9:29 PM
> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > Subject: Terminate the Apache Shindig Project
> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > To: bo...@apache.org <javascript:;>
> <javascript:;>
> > <
> > > >>> > bo...@apache.org <javascript:;>
> > > >>> > >> > <javascript:;>>
> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > Cc: priv...@shindig.apache.org <javascript:;>
> > > >>> > <javascript:;> <
> > > >>> > >> > priv...@shindig.apache.org <javascript:;> <javascript:;>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> > >> > > > > > >
> > > >>> > >> > > > > > >
> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > WHEREAS, the Project Management Committee of the
> > > Apache
> > > >>> > >> > > DirectMemory
> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > project has chosen by vote to recommend moving the
> > > >>> project
> > > >>> > to
> > > >>> > >> the
> > > >>> > >> > > > > > >  Attic; and
> > > >>> > >> > > > > > >
> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it no longer
> > in
> > > >>> the
> > > >>> > best
> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > interest of the Foundation to continue the Apache
> > > >>> Shindig
> > > >>> > >> project
> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > due to inactivity;
> > > >>> > >> > > > > > >
> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Apache
> > > Shindig
> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > project is hereby terminated; and be it further
> > > >>> > >> > > > > > >
> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > RESOLVED, that the Attic PMC be and hereby is
> tasked
> > > >>> with
> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > oversight over the software developed by the
> Apache
> > > >>> Shindig
> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > Project; and be it further
> > > >>> > >> > > > > > >
> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President,
> Apache
> > > >>> > Shindig"
> > > >>> > >> is
> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > hereby terminated; and be it further
> > > >>> > >> > > > > > >
> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Shindig PMC is hereby
> > > >>> terminated.
> > > >>> > >> > > > > > >
> > > >>> > >> > > > > >
> > > >>> > >> > > > >
> > > >>> > >> > > >
> > > >>> > >> > >
> > > >>> > >> >
> > > >>> > >> >
> > > >>> > >> >
> > > >>> > >> > --
> > > >>> > >> > Chris Spiliotopoulos
> > > >>> > >> >
> > > >>> > >> > Solutions Architect | @LinkedIn
> > > >>> > >> > <https://www.linkedin.com/pub/chris-spiliotopoulos>|
> @Twitter
> > > >>> > >> > <https://twitter.com/chefArchitect>
> > > >>> > >> >
> > > >>> > >>
> > > >>> > >
> > > >>> > >
> > > >>> > >
> > > >>> > > --
> > > >>> > > Chris Spiliotopoulos
> > > >>> > >
> > > >>> > > Solutions Architect | @LinkedIn
> > > >>> > > <https://www.linkedin.com/pub/chris-spiliotopoulos>| @Twitter
> > > >>> > > <https://twitter.com/chefArchitect>
> > > >>> > >
> > > >>> > >
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to