Hi Ryan, Thank you.
I think it would be good if we officially move this project to github. If not possible then put this project to attic and then just create single copy on github, so that we have one project for all dev community to concentrate on. Otherwise we will end up creating same project in different places with different versions and customization which is very hard to track and focus on. If you all okay i can checkout the project from apache and put it into github, if there is way anybody know directly moving from apache to github then we can do that way. What you think about this Ryan/Chris/Darren and all others? Thank You. On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 10:52 AM, Ryan Baxter <rbaxte...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi Guys, > > It is great to see your enthusiasm for the project! I still need to go > through the process of moving the project to attic in Apache, but I don't > see why you cant take the pieces you want and start a "new" project > elsewhere. > > On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 5:07 PM Raj Janorkar <raj.janor...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Thats Great Site Darren. >> Lets give new life to Shindig. >> >> I am sure there are so many other sites using shindig. >> >> Regards, Raj >> >> On Monday 9 November 2015, Darren Bond <db...@globalcad.com> wrote: >> >> > Hi Raj, >> > >> > We did the same and produced www.blueg.com >> > >> > Happy to share some experiences too. >> > >> > Kind regards, >> > >> > Darren >> > >> > ----- Reply message ----- >> > From: "Raj Janorkar" <raj.janor...@gmail.com <javascript:;>> >> > To: "Chris Spiliotopoulos" <chrysanthos.spiliotopou...@gmail.com >> > <javascript:;>> >> > Cc: "dev@shindig.apache.org <javascript:;>" <dev@shindig.apache.org >> > <javascript:;>> >> > Subject: Terminate the Apache Shindig Project >> > Date: Sun, Nov 8, 2015 12:51 PM >> > >> > Just to let you know >> > >> > I was fan of iGoogle, which is closed in 13. So as a fun and learn >> > something i have implemented it - www.igoogleportal.com >> > >> > I can definitely share some working examples. >> > >> > Cheers. >> > >> > On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 10:15 PM, Chris Spiliotopoulos < >> > chrysanthos.spiliotopou...@gmail.com <javascript:;>> wrote: >> > >> > > Hi Raj, >> > > >> > > well I guess this makes 2 of us! Let's wait for what others have to >> say >> > > just to get a clear view of all the perspectives. >> > > >> > > Cheers >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 2:10 PM, Raj Janorkar <raj.janor...@gmail.com >> > <javascript:;>> >> > > wrote: >> > > >> > >> Hi Chris, >> > >> i am ready. >> > >> Last year i was thinking to write documentation with examples but >> > couldn't >> > >> do that. i hate apache way of trunk and website. >> > >> >> > >> This time i can help creating few html pages. >> > >> >> > >> Regards, >> > >> Raj >> > >> >> > >> On Sunday 8 November 2015, Chris Spiliotopoulos < >> > >> chrysanthos.spiliotopou...@gmail.com <javascript:;>> wrote: >> > >> >> > >> > Hi all, >> > >> > >> > >> > having listened carefully to all the voices from the community so >> > far, I >> > >> > have come down to the following conclusion. >> > >> > >> > >> > There are many professionals among us that have been working in the >> > >> shadows >> > >> > supporting this project in diverse ways - evangelizing, advocating, >> > >> > integrating, etc. without the 'shoulders' of a bold-named company >> like >> > >> > Google or IBM (who has been the active maintainer of this project >> for >> > a >> > >> > number of years now). >> > >> > >> > >> > My gut feeling so far has told me that - as has already happened >> with >> > >> many >> > >> > other technologies - these companies usually invest an amount of >> time >> > >> and >> > >> > money for experimenting with different types of technologies and if >> > >> things >> > >> > don't go as planned in the long run, what seems to be happening is >> > that >> > >> > some other company takes over on the experiment and so on, until no >> > big >> > >> > name is really interested any more. >> > >> > >> > >> > During this lifecycle, many other companies are starting to adopt >> the >> > >> > technologies and they are indeed putting them into good use to >> serve >> > >> their >> > >> > purposes. And this is exactly where we stand at the moment. I can >> > >> totally >> > >> > understand the feelings coming from Ichiro and Darren and at the >> same >> > >> time >> > >> > I get Ryan's point of view. So how do we handle this situation? >> > >> Speaking >> > >> > for myself, as I come from Greece and I have to live and work in a >> > >> country >> > >> > that is in crisis mode for quite a few years now, all I can say is >> > that >> > >> a >> > >> > crisis can be the mother of invention and change for a better >> > tomorrow. >> > >> > And this is exactly how I see this situation - in a metaphorical >> way >> > of >> > >> > course :) >> > >> > >> > >> > I think that now is the right time to make a change. Things have >> > >> changed >> > >> > in our industry during the last 10 years and so have trends and >> > >> > communities. Maybe 10 years ago, the Apache Foundation was the >> place >> > >> to be >> > >> > but now this is definitely not the case - of course this doesn't >> mean >> > >> that >> > >> > the foundation is not the birthplace of great technologies. But >> all >> > the >> > >> > action now is over at GitHub. >> > >> > >> > >> > So, since Ryan gave us the green light (from the foundation's >> > >> perspective) >> > >> > that the project can be migrated, I'm outlining my proposals: >> > >> > >> > >> > - We break down the Shindig project into a number of distinct >> > parts - >> > >> > personally I've never used the OpenSocial features and have no >> > >> interest >> > >> > in >> > >> > them since I'm heavily focused on the gadget containment and >> > >> rendering >> > >> > facilities. But there are people like Rene who have invested a >> lot >> > >> of >> > >> > time >> > >> > and work on extending the OpenSocial features. >> > >> > - We give it a brand new name - never liked the name Shindig in >> the >> > >> > first place (speaking for myself once more). I think that this >> is >> > >> very >> > >> > important since we want to make a bold statement to communities >> > that >> > >> > this >> > >> > technology is active, we're using it and others should try it >> out >> > >> > because >> > >> > it may solve them a number of problems. >> > >> > - Create a modern web site on GitHub where we can all share our >> > >> > experiences through show cases, usage examples and tutorials >> > >> > - We start thinking around the concept of a gadget-centered >> > >> marketplace >> > >> > - in the context of show casing stuff. If I remember correctly >> > >> Darren's >> > >> > team has already launched a project which is very similar to the >> > >> iGoogle >> > >> > web site so he could certainly provide some ideas. >> > >> > - Issues and feature requests can be handled directly though >> GitHub >> > >> in a >> > >> > more agile and community oriented approach without any of the >> > >> > bureaucratic >> > >> > processes imposed by the Apache Foundation. Once the >> 'monolith' is >> > >> > broken >> > >> > down into different projects then it would be more manageable >> and >> > >> people >> > >> > having certain skills could join forces >> > >> > - By utilizing technologies like Docker there is no need for >> > hosting >> > >> > resources and sample material - we can bundle our examples, show >> > >> cases, >> > >> > etc >> > >> > in self-sufficient Docker images and host them over @ DockerHub. >> > The >> > >> > integration with GitHub is seamless so this is a no brainer >> > >> > - Reach out to Atlassian, Jive and the rest of the companies >> who we >> > >> know >> > >> > for sure that they have invested a lot in this technology (and >> > >> actively >> > >> > use >> > >> > it) to help with this effort - e.g. Atlassian has extended >> Shindig >> > >> > container & engine to meet their requirements and they >> definitely >> > >> have >> > >> > devs >> > >> > who know the bits and pieces >> > >> > >> > >> > So the question now for me is really simple. How many of us want >> to >> > >> move >> > >> > over to the next phase without getting into any sort of credibility >> > >> issues >> > >> > regarding our choices? +1 from me. >> > >> > >> > >> > Kind regards, >> > >> > Chris >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 2:49 AM, Ryan Baxter <rbaxte...@apache.org >> > <javascript:;> >> > >> > <javascript:;>> wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > > I completely understand. I can't speak to the continued support >> of >> > >> > vendors >> > >> > > who have adopted Shindig, but I would imagine that they can't >> just >> > >> stop >> > >> > > supporting the products consuming Shindig. I am sorry that this >> > puts >> > >> you >> > >> > > in a tough position but this is a natural cycle of open source >> > >> software. >> > >> > > With no community willing to support and enhance the project >> there >> > is >> > >> not >> > >> > > much we can do. If someone takes the code and the project >> regains >> > >> life >> > >> > > somewhere else, that is great. >> > >> > > >> > >> > > On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 6:22 PM Ichiro Furusato < >> > >> > ichiro.furus...@gmail.com <javascript:;> <javascript:;>> >> >> > >> >> > >> > > wrote: >> > >> > > >> > >> > > > Hi Ryan, >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > While the code is stable and available I can't go to our CIO >> and >> > >> > > architects >> > >> > > > and >> > >> > > > advocate use of a project as the basis for our online delivery >> if >> > >> the >> > >> > > > project has >> > >> > > > folded. We were planning to replace literally five separate >> legacy >> > >> > > portals >> > >> > > > (that >> > >> > > > have been accumulating like mold rather than serve as >> > replacements) >> > >> > using >> > >> > > > Liferay, with our online widgets being replaced by Open Social >> > >> Gadgets. >> > >> > > > With >> > >> > > > the demise of Shindig I assume Liferay's support of embedded >> > Shindig >> > >> > will >> > >> > > > likely disappear, and therefore my ability to advocate for its >> > use. >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > It's not the availability of the code, it's the living status >> of >> > the >> > >> > > > project. If the >> > >> > > > project is dead I can't very well suggest we base millions of >> > >> dollars >> > >> > of >> > >> > > > online >> > >> > > > delivery over the next 5-10 years on it. As I am responsible >> for >> > >> that >> > >> > > > decision >> > >> > > > I could hardly be said to be responsible in advocating for its >> use >> > >> at >> > >> > > this >> > >> > > > stage. >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > Sadly. >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > Cheers, >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > Ichiro >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 3:01 AM, Ryan Baxter < >> rbaxte...@gmail.com >> > <javascript:;> >> > >> > <javascript:;>> wrote: >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > > Ichiro, while the project will move to the attic, it doesn't >> > mean >> > >> you >> > >> > > > can't >> > >> > > > > continue to use it. If it is stable enough as it is right >> now >> > for >> > >> > you >> > >> > > > than >> > >> > > > > you should be able to continue to use it as is. >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 5:59 AM Ichiro Furusato < >> > >> > > > ichiro.furus...@gmail.com <javascript:;> <javascript:;>> >> >> > >> >> > >> > > > > wrote: >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > To add just one more voice to the chorus, I'm likewise very >> > sad >> > >> to >> > >> > > hear >> > >> > > > > of >> > >> > > > > > the demise of what >> > >> > > > > > seemed (until this notice) to be a functional and mature >> > >> project. >> > >> > For >> > >> > > > the >> > >> > > > > > past nine months I have >> > >> > > > > > advocated replacing the four (!) existing (legacy) aviation >> > and >> > >> > > > industry >> > >> > > > > > delivery platforms of the >> > >> > > > > > Meteorological Service of New Zealand (MetService) with a >> > >> > > > Liferay/Shindig >> > >> > > > > > based site. Over the >> > >> > > > > > past year we prototyped a replacement service and are >> > currently >> > >> > > > awaiting >> > >> > > > > > the next project >> > >> > > > > > funding cycle. Having to go back to our executive >> management >> > >> team >> > >> > and >> > >> > > > > tell >> > >> > > > > > them that the >> > >> > > > > > basic architecture of our proposed service is somewhat >> > >> > embarrassing, >> > >> > > > and >> > >> > > > > we >> > >> > > > > > will likewise now >> > >> > > > > > need to reevaluate and design a new solution. As the lead >> > >> designer >> > >> > I >> > >> > > > have >> > >> > > > > > been quite happy >> > >> > > > > > with the Shindig/Open Social Gadget technology, and we had >> > >> looked >> > >> > > > forward >> > >> > > > > > to a robust >> > >> > > > > > implementation cycle, replacing fifteen years of crufty >> > service >> > >> > with >> > >> > > a >> > >> > > > > > shiny new Gadget-based >> > >> > > > > > solution. >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > Sincere thanks to the development team for an excellent >> job, >> > >> very >> > >> > > sorry >> > >> > > > > to >> > >> > > > > > hear about it being >> > >> > > > > > put into the Attic. There may have been inactivity in the >> dev >> > >> side >> > >> > at >> > >> > > > > > Apache but we were actively >> > >> > > > > > using, and planning to use it for a substantial part of our >> > >> online >> > >> > > > > weather >> > >> > > > > > delivery solution. >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > Ichiro >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 7:31 AM, Ryan Baxter < >> > >> rbaxte...@apache.org <javascript:;> >> > >> > <javascript:;>> >> > >> >> > >> > > > > wrote: >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > Hi fellow Shindig Devs, >> > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > I would like to let you all know that the Shindig PMC has >> > >> voted >> > >> > to >> > >> > > > > > > terminate the Shindig project and move it to the attic. >> I >> > >> have >> > >> > > > already >> > >> > > > > > > informed the Apache board about the termination in this >> > months >> > >> > > board >> > >> > > > > > report >> > >> > > > > > > (below). >> > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > As most of you have probably noticed we have seen a >> decline >> > in >> > >> > > > > > > participation in all aspects of the project over the past >> > >> months >> > >> > > and >> > >> > > > > the >> > >> > > > > > > downward trend has been happening for over a year now. >> This >> > >> can >> > >> > > > > > certainly >> > >> > > > > > > be seen in our reports to the board [1]. >> > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > If anyone has any questions please let me know, and I >> will >> > be >> > >> > sure >> > >> > > to >> > >> > > > > > keep >> > >> > > > > > > everyone up to date as we transition the project to the >> > attic. >> > >> > > > Thanks. >> > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > -Ryan >> > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > [1] >> > >> > > > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SHINDIG/Board+Reports >> > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message --------- >> > >> > > > > > > From: Ryan Baxter <rbaxte...@apache.org <javascript:;> >> > <javascript:;>> >> > >> > > > > > > Date: Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 9:29 PM >> > >> > > > > > > Subject: Terminate the Apache Shindig Project >> > >> > > > > > > To: bo...@apache.org <javascript:;> <javascript:;> < >> > bo...@apache.org <javascript:;> >> > >> > <javascript:;>> >> > >> > > > > > > Cc: priv...@shindig.apache.org <javascript:;> >> > <javascript:;> < >> > >> > priv...@shindig.apache.org <javascript:;> <javascript:;>> >> >> > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > WHEREAS, the Project Management Committee of the Apache >> > >> > > DirectMemory >> > >> > > > > > > project has chosen by vote to recommend moving the >> project >> > to >> > >> the >> > >> > > > > > > Attic; and >> > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it no longer in the >> > best >> > >> > > > > > > interest of the Foundation to continue the Apache Shindig >> > >> project >> > >> > > > > > > due to inactivity; >> > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Apache Shindig >> > >> > > > > > > project is hereby terminated; and be it further >> > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > RESOLVED, that the Attic PMC be and hereby is tasked with >> > >> > > > > > > oversight over the software developed by the Apache >> Shindig >> > >> > > > > > > Project; and be it further >> > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache >> > Shindig" >> > >> is >> > >> > > > > > > hereby terminated; and be it further >> > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Shindig PMC is hereby >> terminated. >> > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > >> > Chris Spiliotopoulos >> > >> > >> > >> > Solutions Architect | @LinkedIn >> > >> > <https://www.linkedin.com/pub/chris-spiliotopoulos>| @Twitter >> > >> > <https://twitter.com/chefArchitect> >> > >> > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > -- >> > > Chris Spiliotopoulos >> > > >> > > Solutions Architect | @LinkedIn >> > > <https://www.linkedin.com/pub/chris-spiliotopoulos>| @Twitter >> > > <https://twitter.com/chefArchitect> >> > > >> > > >> >
