On 07.04.11 13:31, "Felix Meschberger" <fmesc...@adobe.com> wrote: >The problem is that ":order" already is used by the Sling POST Servlet >to define the order of newly inserted nodes...
Ah, yes, I thought that one was named differently (should have checked :-)). But maybe this is ok? In all the cases I know, one never does a full round-trip, but rather uses some kind of form / dialog that defines the actual items to show and to update, so if ":order" is not part of it (or not sent along), there will be no conflict. But of course, I don't know what other Sling users are doing. >While I don't think we are walking into a collision here in the near >future, I would like to either not use that name or correlate an >potential update of Sling POST Servlet's use of the parameter, e.g. to >define/update the order of nodes .... If it is 100% round-trippable (i.e. adding support for :order as an array to the Sling POST servlet), why not? Inventing new names adds complexity and potential for confusion... Regards, Alex -- Alexander Klimetschek Developer // Adobe (Day) // Berlin - Basel
