Yes, but if order is important it seems more correct to send an array. And
adding a psuedo 'order' property isn't backward compatible either.
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Tobias Bocanegra <tri...@adobe.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Eric Norman <eric.d.nor...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > why not just render the ordered child nodes as a json array?
>
> that's another way, yes. but then you need to transport the resource
> name in a special property. eg:
>
> {
> name: "foo",
> properties: {
> ....
> },
> children: [
> {
> name:"child1",
> properties: { ... },
> children : [ ...]
> },
> {
> ...
> }
> ]
>
> but this would not be backward compatible and is more complex, too.
> regards, toby
